Aggregate AI readiness comparison across 53500 production sites. This compares all sites built on each framework, not the framework websites themselves.
Next.js Astro
The data is in: Astro sites generally achieve better AI readiness than Next.js sites. Based on 53500 domains, Astro wins 4 of 8 categories. Astro delivers a 85% leaner Token Bloat ratio (47.8× vs 308.5×), meaning AI systems can extract content more cost-effectively from Astro-powered sites. Note: These are aggregate statistics across 52284 Next.js and 1216 Astro production deployments. Your specific implementation may differ—run a free scan to check.
| Metric | Next.js (n=52284) | Astro (n=1216) | Δ% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRI Score | 42.0 | 43.6WIN | 4% | Astro |
| AI Readiness | 60.0 | 69.0WIN | 13% | Astro |
| Token Bloat | 308.5× | 47.8×WIN | 85% | Astro |
| Ghost Ratio | 6% | 5%WIN | 10% | Astro |
| Schema Coverage | 1.1WIN | 0.9 | 18% | Next.js |
| Schema Adoption | 32%WIN | 30% | 7% | Next.js |
| GPTBot Access | 94% | 93% | 1% | TIE |
| Structure Score | 6.5 | 6.6 | 1% | TIE |
These are aggregate stats across thousands of sites. Your specific Next.js or Astro implementation may outperform or underperform the average.