1geki.jp 75 B
🛡️ SEO 62 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 83

1geki.jp — Global SEODiff Score 75/100

1geki.jp
📊

Among all indexed domains, 1geki.jp ranks in the top echelon with an ACRI of 89, demonstrating that its content is highly visible to AI systems. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places 1geki.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 3.9× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

75
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
📈 Mar 17 ACRI +1 (70→71)
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than 1geki.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)62 × 0.25 = 15.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 15.5 + 34.4 + 13.0 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 75 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
96
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1.0%
Rank #9768
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 89/100

1geki.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why 1geki.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

62/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

274 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://1geki.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
  • ✓ og:description — パチンコ・パチスロ(スロット)の解析情報や新台情報を完全無料で提供しています。パチンコ店での遊技中に使用してもらうことに特化し、最速3秒で欲しい情報にリーチできることを目指しています。
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
1geki.jp
71
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 96/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 100 elements (100 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words363
Raw Density27.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

84
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability84/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (19.7 KB)Bloat (57.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage66 / 66 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

27 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 74.4% · SNR: 0.34 · Signal: 5054 / Noise: 14707 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of 1geki.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps engineering teams and product managers plan sprints and optimize resource allocation using AI-powered analysis of game
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, game developers, and data analysts involved in resource planning and optimization.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based with tiered pricing options based on team size and features, starting from a free plan and scaling up to paid tiers.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHub
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and a deep understanding of probabilistic game mechanics, providing a competitive advantage in complex planning scenarios.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time793 ms
Raw HTML Size77.2 KB
Visible Text Size19.7 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

793 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

840
DOM nodes
77 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

4
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts
googletagmanager.comdoubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://1geki.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

223
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for 1geki.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/1geki.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=1geki.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 161 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
-24
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 161 pages · Range 0–72
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 71, but internal pages average only 47 — a -24-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
32487
Avg Bloat
194.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
45
⚠️
45 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 45 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/90/
絆高確関連①エピソードテーブル・絆テーブル:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 72 17.0× 1779 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/5/
設定判別/立ち回りポイント:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 29.5× 1100 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/004/
【設定6】実戦データ&感想②:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 49.3× 522
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/83/
バジリスクチャンス(BC)抽選(AT中):バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 31.5× 849 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/madomagi/87/
追撃チャンス中の上乗せ抽選:SLOT魔法少女まどか☆マギカ - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 38.7× 582
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/009/
【設定5】実戦詳細データ②:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 47.7× 551
https://1geki.jp/slot/cyborg009/002/
【設定1】実戦詳細データ①:パチスロ サイボーグ009 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 31.0× 622
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/65/
状態移行抽選:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 24.0× 1316 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/okidoki/62/
沖ドキ【スロット/パチスロ5号機】モード移行抽選。通常AB・引き戻し・チャンス・保障・天国・ドキドキ・超ドキドキモード滞在時。設定変更時/ロングフリーズ時等。
other 70 35.1× 593 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/osu_sbancho/05/
【設定5】実戦詳細データ①:押忍!サラリーマン番長 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 70 42.6× 575
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/88/
「争忍の刻」継続期待度(人数・ステージ・バトル演出):バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 67 47.5× 512 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/68/
BC当選テーブル選択抽選:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 67 26.1× 1107 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/89/
絆高確関連②絆高確振り分け:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 67 40.3× 636 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/cyborg009/72/
BINGO BATTLE BONUS:パチスロ サイボーグ009 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 67 29.2× 725 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/010/
【設定4】実戦詳細データ②:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 60 52.7× 478
https://1geki.jp/slot/madomagi/92/
穢れ蓄積システム:SLOT魔法少女まどか☆マギカ - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 60 59.5× 374 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/001/
12/17実戦詳細データ①:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 60 63.5× 377
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/003/
【設定6】実戦データ&感想①:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 60 54.6× 465
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/005/
【設定1】実戦データ&感想①:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 60 59.3× 431
https://1geki.jp/slot/basilisk3/006/
【設定6】実戦詳細データ③:バジリスク~甲賀忍法帖~絆 - 【一撃】パチンコ・パチスロ新台解析攻略
other 60 54.8× 451
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/slot/ 151 50 0% 206.9× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 161 pages
1geki.co.jp ×151
paa.or.jp ×151
p-heros.com ×151
shuzai.1geki.jp ×151
slot-madokamagica.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/1geki.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to 1geki.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
1geki.jp (this site) 71 89 WordPress 3.9× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite 1geki.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to 1geki.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is 1geki?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what 1geki does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does 1geki work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with 1geki."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for 1geki.jp:

Current Score
89
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →