afnic.fr 80 A
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 89

afnic.fr — Global SEODiff Score 80/100

afnic.fr
📊

afnic.fr shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 81/100, outperforming 95% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, afnic.fr outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 4.8× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

80
A — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Excellent overall visibility. Architecture (89) is your strongest pillar.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 5 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than afnic.fr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)89 × 0.15 = 13.3
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 33.6 + 14.8 + 13.3
Global SEODiff Score = 80 (A)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
51
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 10%
Rank #100127
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

afnic.fr has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why afnic.fr ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat4.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

72 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

119 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.afnic.fr/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr-FR
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Afnic, solution de Registre Internet des noms de domaine Accueil - Afnic
  • ✓ og:description — L'Afnic est le Registre Internet des noms de domaine en .fr, .re, .pm, .yt, .wf et .tf. / Solutions de Registre - AFNIC
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
afnic.fr
65
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 51/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 49 elements (49 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words631
Raw Density7.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (20.2 KB)Bloat (77.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context74% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage20 / 27 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

5 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 79.4% · SNR: 0.26 · Signal: 5182 / Noise: 19937 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of afnic.fr and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform analyzes DNS attacks on French internet service providers (ISPs), providing insights and resources to understand and mitigate these vulnerabilities.
Target Audience
Cybersecurity professionals, network engineers, IT administrators, and researchers involved in DNS security and incident response.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
CloudflareGoogleF DN
🏆 Competitive Moat
Deep analysis of DNS attacks and vulnerabilities, combined with a focus on French ISP landscape, offering a unique perspective and actionable intelligence.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Papiers d’expertsAgendaNewsletter signup
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of publicly available information about DNS attacks
• Reliance on large tech companies (GAFA) for DNS resolution
• Data privacy concerns associated with using public DNS servers
• Difficulty in identifying and responding to systemic DNS attacks
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-05

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time725 ms
Raw HTML Size98.1 KB
Visible Text Size20.2 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

725 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

624
DOM nodes
98 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3600, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

89/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.afnic.fr/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

69
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr-FR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for afnic.fr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/afnic.fr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=afnic.fr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
-37
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
28
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–90
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 65, but internal pages average only 28 — a -37-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
6658
Avg Bloat
13.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://afnic.fr/faq
FAQ de l’Afnic : nos réponses à vos questions FAQ - Afnic
pricing 90 9.4× 4606 💰 Pricing
https://afnic.fr/about
À propos de l’attaque sur les résolveurs DNS de FAI français
pricing 80 13.2× 1464 💰 Pricing
https://afnic.fr/contact
Support de l’Afnic : Support - Afnic
pricing 59 56.7× 289 💰 Pricing
https://afnic.fr/products
Produits & services - Afnic
pricing 54 52.4× 299 💰 Pricing
https://afnic.fr/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://afnic.fr/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://afnic.fr/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://afnic.fr/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://afnic.fr/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://afnic.fr/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 90 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 80 0% 13.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 54 0% 52.4× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 59 0% 56.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
facebook.com ×4
extranet.nic.fr ×4
mastodon.social ×4
membres.afnic.fr ×4
instagram.com ×4
linkedin.com ×4
issues.edpnet.be ×1
cnil.fr ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/afnic.fr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to afnic.fr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
afnic.fr (this site) 65 81 WordPress 4.8× 3
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite afnic.fr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to afnic.fr. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Afnic?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Afnic does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Afnic work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Afnic."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for afnic.fr:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →