apify.com 62 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 61 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 100

apify.com — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

apify.com
📊

apify.com achieves a 71/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the developer sector, apify.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The bloated 49.8× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (50×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than apify.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)61 × 0.40 = 24.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 24.4 + 10.4 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
44
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #19754
+29 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

apify.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why apify.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat49.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

59 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

154 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://apify.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Apify: Full-stack web scraping and data extraction platform
  • ✓ og:description — Cloud platform for web scraping, browser automation, AI agents, and data for AI. Use 20,000+ ready-made tools, code templates, or order a custom solution.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

61/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
apify.com
48
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 44/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 86 elements (86 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1489
Raw Density5.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

40
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability40/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (9.6 KB)Bloat (469.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio49.8× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage108 / 108 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 479.4 KB, but only 9.6 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (49.8×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.0% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 2463 / Noise: 120259 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of apify.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Apify provides a full-stack platform for web scraping and browser automation, enabling users to automate tasks and extract data from the web.
Target Audience
Developers, data scientists, marketers, web scraping professionals
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with tiered plans based on usage and features.
🔗 Integration Partners
AWSAAIFRealitni pesHlidacprg.aiCzechitasDobrodejky
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive platform for web scraping and browser automation with a growing ecosystem of ready-made tools and integrations.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
PartnershipsPress kitDesign kit
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited information on pricing details
• Lack of specific feature descriptions beyond general capabilities
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time573 ms
Raw HTML Size479.4 KB
Visible Text Size9.6 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

573 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1647
DOM nodes
479 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=10800
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://apify.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

115
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 48/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for apify.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/apify.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=apify.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 116 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
48
Single-page score
+13
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
61
Avg across 116 pages · Range 0–67
Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
179135
Avg Bloat
65.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
111
⚠️
111 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 111 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://apify.com/api/google-search-api
Google Search API · Apify
pricing 67 45.8× 2338 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/seo-ranking/python
SEO ranking API Python Client · Apify
pricing 67 43.8× 2450 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/linkedin-search-api/python
LinkedIn search API Python Client · Apify
pricing 67 26.4× 6552 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/indeed-api/python
Indeed API Python Client · Apify
pricing 67 26.0× 3868 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/google-search-api/python
Google Search API Python Client · Apify
pricing 67 44.4× 2418 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/google-serp-api
Google SERP API · Apify
pricing 67 45.6× 2338 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/google-serp-api/python
Google SERP API Python Client · Apify
pricing 67 44.1× 2434 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/indeed-api
Indeed API · Apify
pricing 67 25.3× 3770 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/linkedin-search-api
LinkedIn search API · Apify
pricing 67 27.1× 6511 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/seo-ranking
SEO ranking API · Apify
pricing 67 44.9× 2375 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/pricing
Apify pricing - plans for data collection at any scale · Apify
pricing 64 51.2× 1651 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/etsy-api
Etsy API · Apify
pricing 64 68.9× 1331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/apple-music-api/python
Apple Music API Python Client · Apify
pricing 64 74.4× 1121 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/google-flights-api
Google Flights API · Apify
pricing 64 76.8× 1122 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/google-news-api
Google News API · Apify
pricing 64 69.5× 1203 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/google-trends/python
Google Trends API Python Client · Apify
pricing 64 43.1× 2936 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/odds-api
Odds API · Apify
pricing 64 74.3× 1223 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/linkedin-jobs-api/python
LinkedIn jobs API Python Client · Apify
pricing 64 44.4× 2010 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/walmart-api/python
Walmart API Python Client · Apify
pricing 64 60.5× 1517 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://apify.com/api/yahoo-finance-api
Yahoo Finance API · Apify
pricing 64 71.5× 1171 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/api/ 106 64 0% 64.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 51.2× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 59 0% 24.4× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 53 1% 81.1× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 46 0% 184.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 53 1% 96.4× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 36 0% 318.3× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 116 pages
blog.apify.com ×112
docs.apify.com ×112
trust.apify.com ×112
crawlee.dev ×112
help.apify.com ×112
console.apify.com ×112
github.com ×112
discord.com ×112
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/apify.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to apify.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
apify.com (this site) 48 71 Next.js 49.8× 0
headbangersports.com 73 84 Next.js 5.5× 2 Compare →
toyota.sk 73 84 Next.js 4.6× 2 Compare →
fermedesaintemarthe.com 73 86 Next.js 14.7× 5 Compare →
mid.sachsen-anhalt.de 73 79 TYPO3 1.8× 0 Compare →
inveniordm.docs.cern.ch 73 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite apify.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to apify.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Apify",
  "url": "https://apify.com",
  "logo": "https://apify.com/favicon.ico?favicon.07789f7d.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Apify",
  "url": "https://apify.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://apify.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Apify?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Apify does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Apify work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Apify."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for apify.com:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →