appwrite.io 64 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 66 ⚡ Perf 41 🏗️ Arch 81

appwrite.io — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

appwrite.io
📊

Among all indexed domains, appwrite.io ranks in the top echelon with an ACRI of 86, demonstrating that its content is highly visible to AI systems. In the infrastructure sector, appwrite.io outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (41) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (119×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 17 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than appwrite.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)66 × 0.40 = 26.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)41 × 0.20 = 8.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 26.4 + 8.2 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
58
Structure
avg 35
84
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #74423
-6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 86/100

appwrite.io is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why appwrite.io ranks here

Tech stackSvelte/SvelteKit
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

39 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

129 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://appwrite.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Appwrite - Built for the first solocorn
  • ✓ og:description — Appwrite is an open-source platform for building applications at any scale, using your preferred programming languages and tools.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

66/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
appwrite.io
60
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 58/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 94 elements (76 lists, 11 rows, 7 headers)
Total Words916
Raw Density10.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (7.2 KB)Bloat (852.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context89% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage96 / 108 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 859.5 KB, but only 7.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.2% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1847 / Noise: 218190 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of appwrite.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Appwrite is a fully managed, open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that simplifies building web and mobile applications by providing a suite
Target Audience
Developers, DevOps engineers, startups, and enterprises seeking a flexible and scalable backend solution; particularly those building web and mobile applications.
Pricing Model
Tiered pricing: Free (limited resources), Pro ($25/month), and Enterprise (custom pricing). Additional API bandwidth and storage are available for purchase.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackDiscordWhatsAppSMSWebhooks
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2HIPAABAA
🏆 Competitive Moat
Appwrite’s open-source nature and self-hosting capabilities, combined with its AI Builder and comprehensive feature set, provide a strong differentiator against proprietary BaaS solutions.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
API documentation pagesPricing comparison pagesSelf-hosting documentation
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited free tier functionality (pause after inactivity)
• Lack of comprehensive documentation for advanced features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time670 ms
Raw HTML Size859.5 KB
Visible Text Size7.2 KB

Performance & Speed

41/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

670 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4390
DOM nodes
860 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://appwrite.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

148
internal links
14
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for appwrite.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/appwrite.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=appwrite.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 50 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
-15
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
46
Avg across 50 pages · Range 0–64
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 60, but internal pages average only 46 — a -15-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
26279
Avg Bloat
110.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://appwrite.io/pricing
Pricing - Appwrite
pricing 64 35.1× 1273 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/response-codes
Response codes - Docs - Appwrite
docs 59 20.7× 2823
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/events
Events - Docs - Appwrite
pricing 59 30.0× 1319 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/webhooks
Webhooks - Docs - Appwrite
pricing 59 26.7× 1498 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/api-keys
API keys - Docs - Appwrite
pricing 56 51.6× 711 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/billing
Billing - Docs - Appwrite
pricing 56 50.6× 584 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/custom-domains
Custom domains - Docs - Appwrite
pricing 56 47.7× 773 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/message-templates
Message templates - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 45.0× 789
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/release-policy
Release policy - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 31.1× 1133
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/fair-use-policy
Fair use policy - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 54.7× 536
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/free
Free - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 55.0× 538
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/phone-otp
Phone OTP - Docs - Appwrite
pricing 56 51.5× 1034 💰 Pricing
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/permissions
Permissions - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 27.5× 1356
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/rate-limits
Rate-limits - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 56.1× 555
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/pro
Pro - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 45.7× 659
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/platform/shortcuts
Keyboard shortcuts - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 55.7× 569
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/security/authentication
Authentication - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 34.6× 829
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/migrations/firebase
Migrate from Firebase - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 50.8× 569
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/migrations/nhost
Migrate from Nhost - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 50.4× 578
https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/migrations/supabase
Migrate from Supabase - Docs - Appwrite
docs 56 49.4× 591
Showing 20 of 50 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 41 50 0% 104.8× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 46 0% 114.4× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 46 0% 138.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 35.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 56 0% 53.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 26 0% 872.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 50 pages
linkedin.com ×46
youtube.com ×46
twitter.com ×46
github.com ×46
cloud.appwrite.io ×46
app.daily.dev ×46
instagram.com ×45
bsky.app ×45
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/appwrite.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to appwrite.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
appwrite.io (this site) 60 86 Svelte/SvelteKit 119.1× 2
lobbes.nl 85 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 2 Compare →
derolfgroep.nl 85 89 WordPress 1.8× 2 Compare →
qtponline.com 85 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 2 Compare →
gurapan.jp 85 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 2 Compare →
lobbesspeelgoed.be 85 89 Cloudflare Pages 1.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite appwrite.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to appwrite.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Appwrite",
  "url": "https://appwrite.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://appwrite.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Appwrite?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Appwrite does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Appwrite work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Appwrite."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for appwrite.io:

Current Score
86
Projected Score
98
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →