asam.org 63 C
🛡️ SEO 39 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 79

asam.org — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

asam.org
📊

With a 64/100 ACRI, asam.org has a moderate AI visibility profile — functional but not yet optimized for AI crawlers. In the infrastructure sector, asam.org outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.3×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 5 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than asam.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)39 × 0.25 = 9.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 9.8 + 28.8 + 13.0 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
17
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 10%
Rank #96195
+38 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

asam.org punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why asam.org ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

39/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

290 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.asam.org
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — ASAM - American Society of Addiction Medicine
  • ✓ og:description — The American Society of Addiction Medicine or ASAM, is the professional home of addiction medicine physicians and specialists. Founded in 1954, is a professional medical society representing over 7,000 physicians, clinicians, and associated professionals in the field of addiction medicine.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
asam.org
42
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 17/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 11 elements (11 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1249
Raw Density0.9%
💡Low structure score (17/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 11 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

50
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability50/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

43%
🗑️ 57%
Useful Content (44.7 KB)Bloat (58.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context94% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage30 / 32 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

68 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 56.7% · SNR: 0.76 · Signal: 11430 / Noise: 14948 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of asam.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website recognizes and celebrates donors who contribute to ASAM at various levels, highlighting their significant support and impact.
Target Audience
Philanthropists, medical professionals, and individuals interested in supporting addiction medicine research and treatment.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Recognition of significant philanthropic contributions within the addiction medicine field.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited information on the website beyond donor recognition
• Lack of a clear call to action beyond learning about charitable giving
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-05

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time554 ms
Raw HTML Size103.0 KB
Visible Text Size44.7 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

554 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

922
DOM nodes
103 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

184
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 42/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for asam.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/asam.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=asam.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 49 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
42
Single-page score
-10
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
32
Avg across 49 pages · Range 0–80
Topical Cohesion
21%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
12584
Avg Bloat
49.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.asam.org/membership/Communities
Online Communities
pricing 80 11.6× 1338 💰 Pricing
https://www.asam.org/advocacy/national-advocacy/national-addiction-policy-initiatives/cover-it/p-coat-apm
P-COAT APM
pricing 75 12.0× 1287 💰 Pricing
https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/level-of-care-certification/locc-faq
LOCC FAQ
pricing 75 18.4× 742 💰 Pricing
https://www.asam.org/quality-care/clinical-recommendations/tobacco
Integrating Tobacco Use Disorder Interventions in Addiction Treatment
other 75 24.3× 583
https://www.asam.org/about-us/charitable-giving/donor-recognition
Donor Recognition
pricing 75 27.6× 524 💰 Pricing
https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/toolkit
Speaking the Same Language About Addiction Care
other 75 22.8× 645
https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/copyright-and-permissions/permission-request-forms/Books-request-form
Books Permissions Request Form
other 72 30.3× 647
https://www.asam.org/styleguide
style guide
blog 70 25.5× 806
https://www.asam.org/about-us/leadership/board-of-directors/biography-stephen-taylor
Biography - Stephen M. Taylor, MD, MPH, DFASAM
about 70 24.0× 552
https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/copyright-and-permissions/permission-request-forms/healthcare-providers-permission-request-form
Healthcare Providers Permission Request Form
other 67 30.5× 605
https://www.asam.org/about-us/about-asam/asam-news-archives-and-history
ASAM News Archives and History
about 67 27.1× 1021
https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/asam-criteria-software
Software
other 65 29.8× 440
https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/state-implementation
The ASAM Criteria & State Implementation
other 62 49.5× 264
https://www.asam.org/about-us/leadership/board-of-directors/biography-anika-alvanzo
Biography - Anika Alvanzo, MD, MS, FACP, DFASAM
pricing 60 27.6× 477 💰 Pricing
https://www.asam.org/education/host-a-course/treatment-of-opioid-use-disorder-course-host-interest-form
Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Course Host Interest Form 
pricing 57 40.7× 421 💰 Pricing
https://www.asam.org/about-us/our-history/1950s
1950s
about 57 38.7× 316
https://www.asam.org/about-us/leadership/board-of-directors/biography-marla-d-kushner
Biography - Marla D. Kushner, DO, FSAHM, FACOFP, DFASAM
about 57 54.9× 233
https://www.asam.org/about-us/our-history/1970s
1970s
about 57 45.3× 271
https://www.asam.org/ElectionsandNominations/2023_Board/nicole-labor
Biography - Nicole Labor, DO, FASAM
other 57 56.8× 225
https://www.asam.org/publications-resources/advertise-with-asam
Advertise With ASAM
blog 57 51.1× 253
Showing 20 of 49 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about-us/ 13 34 0% 18.9× High JS Bloat
/asam-criteria/ 9 46 0% 20.1× High JS Bloat
/quality-care/ 4 19 0% 6.1× High JS Bloat
/membership/ 3 58 0% 30.9× High JS Bloat
/advocacy/ 2 56 0% 519.0× High JS Bloat
/publications-resources/ 2 56 0% 57.6× High JS Bloat
/ElectionsandNominations/ 2 28 0% 28.4× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/education/ 1 57 0% 40.7× High JS Bloat
/events/ 1 37 0% 305.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 49 pages
twitter.com ×26
linkedin.com ×26
youtube.com ×26
instagram.com ×26
facebook.com ×26
connect.asam.org ×25
email.asam.org ×25
my.asam.org ×25
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/asam.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to asam.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
asam.org (this site) 42 64 Express 2.3× 0
fotoknudsen.no 67 80 Express 4.9× 2 Compare →
123print.com 67 77 Express 8.3× 0 Compare →
wasserstrom.com 67 78 Express 8.7× 0 Compare →
mercimamanboutique.com 67 79 Express 9.9× 5 Compare →
cocuk.bandirma.edu.tr 67 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite asam.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to asam.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Asam",
  "url": "https://asam.org",
  "logo": "https://asam.org/ResourcePackages/ASAM2021/assets/src/img/favicon/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Asam",
  "url": "https://asam.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://asam.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Asam?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Asam does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Asam work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Asam."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for asam.org:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →