au.com 73 B
🛡️ SEO 56 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 84

au.com — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

au.com
📊

au.com demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 87/100 — placing it in the top 99% of all indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, au.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 4.4× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (56) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than au.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)56 × 0.25 = 14.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)84 × 0.15 = 12.6
Weighted sum = 14.0 + 33.6 + 13.0 + 12.6
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
65
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #4831
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 87/100

au.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why au.com ranks here

Tech stackAdobe Experience Manager
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

56/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

2 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

98 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.au.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
au.com
67
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 175 elements (175 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words377
Raw Density46.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

85
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability85/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

22%
🗑️ 78%
Useful Content (30.8 KB)Bloat (105.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context65% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage50 / 77 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

15 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 77.3% · SNR: 0.29 · Signal: 7875 / Noise: 26867 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of au.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score65/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time818 ms
Raw HTML Size135.7 KB
Visible Text Size30.8 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

818 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1168
DOM nodes
136 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → stale-while-revalidate=60, stale-if-error=60
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

84/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.au.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

169
internal links
67
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for au.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/au.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=au.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1009 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
55
Avg across 1009 pages · Range 0–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 67, but internal pages average only 55 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
478253
Avg Bloat
67.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
144
⚠️
144 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 144 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.au.com/english/support/plan/
Items to prepare for Rate plan change | Support | au
pricing 77 17.1× 1326 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/english/support/use-auid/
Check your current contract content and processes | Support | au
pricing 77 19.5× 3745 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/mobile/onlineshop/guide/preparation-mnp/
お申し込み準備:他社から乗りかえ(MNP)| スマートフォン・携帯電話 | au
pricing 75 75.4× 542 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/ipad/service/warranty-wide-acs-icloud/
故障紛失サポート ワイド with AppleCare Services & iCloud+ | サービス・エリア | iPad | au
pricing 75 64.4× 1014 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/iphone/service/warranty-acs-icloud/
故障紛失サポート with AppleCare Services & iCloud+ | サービス・エリア | iPhone | au
pricing 75 62.9× 949 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/mobile/product/plus-one/asus-chromebook/
ASUS Chromebook Detachable CM3 | au +1 collection | au
pricing 75 15.8× 2594 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/mobile/service/tentousettei-support/
au店頭サポート | サービス・機能 | au
pricing 75 60.6× 671 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/iphone/service/warranty-wide-acs-icloud/
故障紛失サポート ワイド with AppleCare Services & iCloud+ | サービス・エリア | iPhone | au
pricing 75 57.1× 1202 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/mobile/product/plus-one/galaxy-watch-6/
Galaxy Watch6 | au +1 collection | au
pricing 75 57.0× 664 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/life/auhome/service/setup/
訪問設置サポート | 訪問サービス | くらしのサービス | au
pricing 75 63.1× 588 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/ipad/service/warranty-acs-icloud/
故障紛失サポート with AppleCare Services & iCloud+ | サービス・エリア | iPad | au
pricing 75 64.8× 861 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/mobile/service/kosho-funshitsu-wide-cloud/
故障紛失サポート ワイド with Cloud | サービス・機能 | au
pricing 75 83.6× 668 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/english/mobile/service/tethering/
Tethering Option│Services & Features│au
pricing 75 12.2× 1733 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/mobile/onlineshop/guide/payment/
お支払方法 | スマートフォン・携帯電話 | au
pricing 75 71.3× 556 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/english/support/contract/
Items to prepare for a new contract | Support | au
pricing 75 11.6× 2219 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/mobile/onlineshop/guide/preparation-subscription/
お申し込み準備:新規契約 | スマートフォン・携帯電話 | au
pricing 72 74.5× 525 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/mobile/onlineshop/guide/faq/
FAQ(よくあるご質問) | スマートフォン・携帯電話 | au
pricing 72 104.8× 857 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/mobile/onlineshop/guide/preparation-whiterom/
お申し込み準備:機種のみ購入 | スマートフォン・携帯電話 | au
pricing 72 74.3× 512 💰 Pricing
https://www.au.com/mobile/service/kosho-funshitsu/compensation/
補償内容 | 故障紛失サポート: サービス・機能 | au
pricing 72 63.1× 647 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.au.com/mobile/product/plus-one/googlepixelbudspro/
Google Pixel Buds Pro | au +1 collection | au
pricing 72 49.4× 610 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/mobile/ 309 63 0% 71.1× High JS Bloat
/information/ 63 57 0% 64.1× High JS Bloat
/iphone/ 26 64 0% 69.8× High JS Bloat
/support/ 24 62 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/internet/ 16 63 0% 74.6× High JS Bloat
/apple-watch/ 16 63 0% 51.7× High JS Bloat
/ipad/ 15 66 0% 75.0× High JS Bloat
/english/ 13 66 0% 30.0× High JS Bloat
/developer/ 6 58 0% 56.0× High JS Bloat
/life/ 4 65 0% 69.6× High JS Bloat
/homepod/ 2 60 0% 56.0× High JS Bloat
/electricity/ 2 57 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/finance/ 2 62 0% 87.0× High JS Bloat
/pr/ 1 62 0% 25.8× High JS Bloat
/googlehome/ 1 62 0% 69.0× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/au.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to au.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
au.com (this site) 67 87 Adobe Experience Manager 4.4× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
symbolonly.com 86 89 Cloudflare Pages 2.4× 3 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite au.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to au.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Au",
  "url": "https://au.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://au.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Au?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Au does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Au work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Au."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for au.com:

Current Score
87
Projected Score
97
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →