axa.co.jp 49 D
🛡️ SEO 27 🤖 GEO 59 ⚡ Perf 22 🏗️ Arch 94

axa.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 49/100

axa.co.jp
📊

axa.co.jp achieves a 76/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places axa.co.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. Heavy markup overhead (46.6× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

49
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (22) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (47×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 11 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than axa.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)27 × 0.25 = 6.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)59 × 0.40 = 23.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)22 × 0.20 = 4.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 6.8 + 23.6 + 4.4 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 49 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #63647
+11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

axa.co.jp shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why axa.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackReact
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat46.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

27/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

19 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 17
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.axa.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

59/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
axa.co.jp
55
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 46.6x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 287 elements (287 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words587
Raw Density48.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

54
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability54/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (17.6 KB)Bloat (802.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio46.6× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context66% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage21 / 32 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 819.6 KB, but only 17.6 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (46.6×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.9% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 4499 / Noise: 205310 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of axa.co.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
MyAXA provides a 24/7 digital platform for customers to manage insurance policies, inquire about products, and receive support through a
Target Audience
Customers seeking insurance products and services, including those interested in medical insurance, cancer insurance, and lifelong coverage, as well as those needing assistance with existing policies.
Pricing Model
Variable based on product selection and coverage levels; no explicit pricing information provided.
🔗 Integration Partners
MyAXA
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive digital insurance platform with a dedicated chatbot and personalized support, offering a wide range of insurance products and services beyond traditional coverage.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Product comparison pagesFAQ pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of explicit pricing information
• Limited SEO signals beyond product descriptions
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkReact
AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2338 ms
Raw HTML Size819.6 KB
Visible Text Size17.6 KB

Performance & Speed

22/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2338 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2361
DOM nodes
820 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, proxy-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → /sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

335
internal links
21
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for axa.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/axa.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=axa.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 68 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
-16
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
39
Avg across 68 pages · Range 0–64
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 55, but internal pages average only 39 — a -16-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
11507
Avg Bloat
655.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
3
⚠️
3 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 3 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/medical/smart-care/
医療保険 スマート・ケア|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 64 376.7× 507 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/company/hpm/employee-voice/
健康経営アクサ式 - 健康経営に取り組む企業の従業員の声 | アクサ生命保険株式会社
about 54 535.2× 337
https://www.axa.co.jp/company/hpm/
健康経営アクサ式 - みんなと会社の未来を健康に。 | アクサ生命保険株式会社
about 54 728.7× 236
https://www.axa.co.jp/company/
法人のお客さま|アクサ生命株式会社
about 54 725.9× 235
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/medical/ pricing 54 410.8× 314 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/ladies/smart-care-ladies/
女性向け医療保険 スマート・ケア レディース |アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 517.5× 323 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/chronic/smart-care-with-you
医療保険 スマート・ケア ウィズユー|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 398.4× 466 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/saving/unit-link/
資産形成の変額保険 ユニット・リンク|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 1131.4× 201 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/saving/unit-link/voc/customer-a/
資産形成の変額保険 ユニット・リンク|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 1131.4× 201 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/cancer/
がん保険|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 589.1× 202 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/ladies/
アクサ生命の女性向けの保険をご紹介しています。病気やケガをした場合の経済的な不安を軽減するための備えです。アクサ生命保険株式会社公式ホームページです。
pricing 54 548.6× 218 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/disability/wl_lcv_di_rider/ product 54 445.3× 409
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/nursing_care/nursing_care_product
生命保険商品一覧|アクサ生命保険株式会社
product 54 445.0× 410
https://www.axa.co.jp/customer/service/
付帯サービス|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 439.7× 398 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.axa.co.jp/customer/service/ameasa/
アクサメディカルアシスタンスサービス|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 633.1× 248 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/medical/prevention/
生命保険商品一覧|アクサ生命保険株式会社
product 54 444.9× 410
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/saving/unit-link/voc/customer-b/
資産形成の変額保険 ユニット・リンク|アクサ生命保険株式会社
pricing 54 1131.4× 201 💰 Pricing
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/cancer/cancer_income_support/
生命保険商品一覧|アクサ生命保険株式会社
product 54 445.0× 410
https://www.axa.co.jp/product/
生命保険商品一覧|アクサ生命保険株式会社
product 54 445.0× 410
https://www.axa.co.jp/customer/guide/
各種お手続き|ご契約者さま|アクサ生命保険株式会社
blog 44 842.2× 177
Showing 20 of 68 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/product/ 40 47 0% 770.0× High JS Bloat
/customer/ 9 41 0% 680.9× High JS Bloat
/company/ 8 48 0% 785.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about-axa/ 1 44 0% 1391.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 68 pages
myweb.axa.co.jp ×56
axa-holdings.co.jp ×56
help.axa.co.jp ×56
youtube.com ×56
axa-direct.co.jp ×56
axa.com ×56
axa-wealth-management.co.jp ×55
axa-direct-life.co.jp ×55
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/axa.co.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to axa.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
axa.co.jp (this site) 55 76 React 46.6× 1
sneci.hu 80 87 Express 1.9× 1 Compare →
home.edweb.net 80 88 WordPress 4.1× 1 Compare →
officeshoes.hu 80 89 Cloudflare Pages 2.0× 1 Compare →
bashfashion.co.uk 80 82 Next.js 4.0× 1 Compare →
ura9.com 80 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite axa.co.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to axa.co.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://axa.co.jp",
  "logo": "https://axa.co.jp/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://axa.co.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://axa.co.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for axa.co.jp:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →