battleye.com 61 C
🛡️ SEO 34 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 63

battleye.com — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

battleye.com
📊

battleye.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 69/100, outperforming 64% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), battleye.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 4.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 13, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 14 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 13
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than battleye.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)34 × 0.25 = 8.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)63 × 0.15 = 9.4
Weighted sum = 8.5 + 29.2 + 13.6 + 9.4
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #15075
+35 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 36%
Score 69/100

battleye.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why battleye.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

34/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

41 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.battleye.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
battleye.com
44
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 15 elements (15 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words768
Raw Density2.0%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 15 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

53
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability53/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (9.1 KB)Bloat (34.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context98% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage57 / 58 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

5 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 79.2% · SNR: 0.26 · Signal: 2329 / Noise: 8889 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of battleye.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
BattlEye provides a proactive anti-cheat system that prevents cheating from occurring in online games, protecting game developers from cheating and maintaining a fair gaming environment.
Target Audience
Game developers, game publishers, online game operators
Pricing Model
Custom pricing, risk-free demonstrations
🔗 Integration Partners
Steam
🏆 Competitive Moat
Proactive anti-cheat system with global banning capabilities and continuous evolution to combat new cheating methods.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
contact[at]battleye.comLICENSE FORM
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Dealing with cheating in online games
• Maintaining a fair gaming environment
• Complex integration processes
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1647 ms
Raw HTML Size43.8 KB
Visible Text Size9.1 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1647 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

330
DOM nodes
44 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

63/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

21
internal links
51
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for battleye.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/battleye.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=battleye.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 19 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
40
Avg across 19 pages · Range 0–82
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
11244
Avg Bloat
11.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
http://www.battleye.com/support/faq/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » FAQ
support 82 3.2× 2898
https://battleye.com/faq
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » FAQ
support 82 3.2× 2898
http://www.battleye.com/support/documentation/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » Documentation
docs 77 9.7× 501
https://battleye.com/about
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » About
about 77 7.0× 1089
http://www.battleye.com/about/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » About
about 77 7.0× 1089
http://www.battleye.com/news/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » News
pricing 77 5.3× 1149 💰 Pricing
http://www.battleye.com/imprint/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » Imprint
other 77 9.0× 549
http://www.battleye.com/support/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » Support
support 57 10.9× 434
http://www.battleye.com/2015/02/09/a-new-dawn/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » A New Dawn
other 54 13.6× 334
https://battleye.com/contact
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » Contact
support 36 51.7× 104
http://www.battleye.com/contact/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » Contact
support 36 51.7× 104
http://www.battleye.com/downloads/
BattlEye – The Anti-Cheat Gold Standard » Downloads
other 36 45.3× 95
https://battleye.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://battleye.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://battleye.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://battleye.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://battleye.com/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://battleye.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://battleye.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/support/ 3 72 0% 7.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 2 36 0% 51.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 77 0% 7.0× High JS Bloat
/news/ 1 77 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 82 0% 3.2× Healthy
/2015/ 1 54 0% 13.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/downloads/ 1 36 0% 45.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/imprint/ 1 77 0% 9.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 19 pages
twitter.com ×12
facebook.com ×12
modulstyle.com ×12
vostokgames.com ×2
newworldinteractive.com ×2
madbytegames.com ×2
epicgames.com ×2
neowiz.co.kr ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/battleye.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to battleye.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
battleye.com (this site) 44 69 WordPress 4.8× 0
winemeridian.com 69 82 WordPress 5.2× 1 Compare →
tjad.takarajimasha.tkj.jp 69 90 WordPress 5.8× 1 Compare →
forte.jor.br 69 80 WordPress 3.7× 1 Compare →
cbsetuts.com 69 78 WordPress 7.5× 1 Compare →
hitt-gc.com 69 83 WordPress 9.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite battleye.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 3 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

77
Homepage ACRI
59
Inner Avg ACRI
+18
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
20%
Inner Avg Ghost
19
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
36 40% support https://battleye.com/contact
82 0% support https://battleye.com/faq
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

27 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

33
Total Links
27
Unique Domains
11.0
Avg/Page
82%
Diversity
facebook.com modulstyle.com twitter.com daybreakgames.com cipsoft.com po.playwithlatam.com aeriagames.com reto.dk nsstudio.co.kr support.microsoft.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 28.0

AI trust scores for the domains battleye.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to battleye.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Battleye",
  "url": "https://battleye.com",
  "logo": "https://www.battleye.com/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Battleye",
  "url": "https://battleye.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://battleye.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Battleye?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Battleye does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Battleye work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Battleye."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for battleye.com:

Current Score
69
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →