behance.net 55 D
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 56 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 93

behance.net — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

behance.net
📋 Executive Audit

Behance.net, a leading platform for creative professionals and developers, operates in a competitive digital landscape with a Global SEODiff Score of 53 and an ACRi Grade of D, indicating significant room for improvement in core SEO and content visibility. Despite its strong architectural foundation—evidenced by a near-perfect Architecture Score of 93 and a declared sitemap—the site underperforms in key areas such as content integrity (49), retrieval robustness (34), and performance (22), which collectively hinder discoverability and user engagement. The platform’s technical stack, built on Express, supports a high degree of flexibility but is burdened by a 30% ghost ratio and a staggering token bloat ratio of 131.2x, reflecting excessive non-semantic HTML and poor content-to-code efficiency.

The site demonstrates strong AI-readiness with full access granted to major crawlers including GPTbot, Claudebot, and Google’s extended bots, and no AI-blocking meta tags are present. However, this advantage is undermined by a complete absence of structured data—zero schema blocks across all types (Organization, Article, Breadcrumb, etc.)—which severely limits semantic indexing and rich result potential. While the site is technically accessible and secure (HSTS enabled), performance remains a critical weakness: a TTFB of 3,688ms and an HTML payload of 860.7KB drastically impair user experience and crawl efficiency. With only 991 words of actual content and just 6,718 bytes of useful text, the site suffers from severe content dilution despite its large footprint.

Architecturally, Behance exhibits a well-connected internal link structure (185 internal links) and a declared sitemap, suggesting solid crawlability. Yet, the high ghost ratio and low content-to-HTML ratio indicate widespread inefficiency in content delivery. The absence of structured data and poor content integrity suggest a gap in semantic clarity and entity coverage. To elevate visibility, the team should prioritize reducing token bloat, optimizing TTFB, and implementing schema markup—particularly for projects, creators, and portfolios—to enhance both AI indexing and SERP performance.

✦ Executive Audit synthesized by SEODiff AI · Mar 5, 2026
55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (34) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (132×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📉 Mar 20 ACRI -1 (50→49)
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than behance.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)56 × 0.40 = 22.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 22.4 + 6.8 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
59
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #497
+38 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

behance.net punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why behance.net ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

79 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

92 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.behance.net
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

56/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
behance.net
49
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 131.5x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 59/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 97 elements (97 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words932
Raw Density10.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

39
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability39/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (6.2 KB)Bloat (810.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context98% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage64 / 65 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 816.3 KB, but only 6.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.2% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1589 / Noise: 207374 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of behance.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
1/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
ExploreJobsResourcesHireDownload
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No clear core offering
• No target audience defined
• No pricing model mentioned
• No competitive moat described
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Serveradobe
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1316 ms
Raw HTML Size816.3 KB
Visible Text Size6.2 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1316 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2013
DOM nodes
816 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=3600, no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.behance.net/sitemap
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

186
internal links
25
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for behance.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/behance.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=behance.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 11 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
-48
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
1
Avg across 11 pages · Range 0–16
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 49, but internal pages average only 1 — a -48-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
16
Avg Bloat
4.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.behance.net/joblist/342909/3d-designer careers 16 46.5× 16
https://behance.net/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/api docs 0 0.0× 0
https://www.behance.net/gallery/245646151/About about 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/help support 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/get-started conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/support support 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/security trust 0 0.0× 0
https://behance.net/terms other 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/joblist/ 1 16 0% 46.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/api/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/gallery/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/support/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/terms/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/security/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/get-started/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/behance.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to behance.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
behance.net (this site) 49 68 Express 131.5× 0
homecenter.nl 74 84 Express 7.7× 2 Compare →
kariera.zoznam.sk 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 0 Compare →
emucr.com 74 82 Blogger 4.9× 0 Compare →
giroportal.com.br 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 0 Compare →
silverjeans.com 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite behance.net when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to behance.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Behance",
  "url": "https://behance.net",
  "logo": "https://a5.behance.net/f2653f41635d0590746df4da9c5aa0b0bc2bea96/img/site/favicon.png?cb=264615658",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Behance",
  "url": "https://behance.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://behance.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Behance?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Behance does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Behance work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Behance."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for behance.net:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

15.3
AI-Trust
#228
Global Rank
87%
Percentile
121
Inbound AI Links
0
Outbound AI Links
56
Avg Inbound ACRI
12%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
elated-themes.com 77 0.0 ← cites you
qodeinteractive.com 77 0.0 ← cites you
mikado-themes.com 77 0.0 ← cites you
select-themes.com 77 0.0 ← cites you
physics.info 75 0.0 ← cites you
edge-themes.com 75 0.0 ← cites you
3dzip.org 74 0.0 ← cites you
freeslots99.com 72 0.0 ← cites you
yudaevschool.ru 72 0.0 ← cites you
manhwaden.com 70 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →