beymen.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 53 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 24 🏗️ Arch 95

beymen.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

beymen.com
📊

With a solid 83/100 ACRI, beymen.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 97% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, beymen.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 1.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (24) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 19 ACRI -1 (79→78)
📈 Mar 14 ACRI +1 (78→79)
Does your site score higher than beymen.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)53 × 0.25 = 13.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)24 × 0.20 = 4.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)95 × 0.15 = 14.2
Weighted sum = 13.2 + 33.6 + 4.8 + 14.2
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
84
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #36169
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

beymen.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why beymen.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat1.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

53/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

165 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.beymen.com/tr
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
beymen.com
78
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 84/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 823 elements (823 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3852
Raw Density21.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

81
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability81/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

52%
🗑️ 48%
Useful Content (466.5 KB)Bloat (438.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context74% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage53 / 72 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

78 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 48.4% · SNR: 1.06 · Signal: 119435 / Noise: 112250 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of beymen.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
RONCATO offers a comprehensive online marketplace for premium luggage and accessories, focusing on stylish and durable travel solutions for discerning customers.
Target Audience
Luxury travelers, frequent flyers, business professionals, and individuals seeking high-quality travel gear.
Pricing Model
Direct-to-consumer, with prices varying based on product type and size. Discounts and promotions are frequently offered.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Strong brand reputation for quality and design, coupled with a wide selection of RONCATO products and a focus on customer experience.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pages (e.g., trolley vs. suitcase)Integration directory pages (implied through product descriptions)Product detail pages with numerous images and specifications
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO optimization of product pages (thin content)
• Lack of structured data markup (FAQ schema)
• Reliance on image-heavy pages with limited textual content
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1906 ms
Raw HTML Size905.0 KB
Visible Text Size466.5 KB

Performance & Speed

24/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1906 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

5296
DOM nodes
905 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

95/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.beymen.com/tr/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1592
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 78/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for beymen.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/beymen.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=beymen.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1010 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
78
Single-page score
-19
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 1010 pages · Range 0–69
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 78, but internal pages average only 59 — a -19-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
560594
Avg Bloat
949.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-fiolas-58560
Fiolas Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 233.2× 987 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-nessi-byrd-58886
Nessi Byrd Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 391.6× 553 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-tres-jolie-lollie-58905
Tres Jolie Lollie Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 406.0× 556 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-divoom-59180
Divoom Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 192.0× 1224 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-bond-no-9-59181
Bond No. 9 Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 216.6× 920 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-calvin-klein-205we39nyc-59247
Calvin Klein 205we39nyc Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 304.6× 794 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-chanel-59404
CHANEL Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 119.0× 1959 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-maurizio-baldassari-59602
Maurizio Baldassari Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 359.3× 674 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-mybestfriends-59727
Mybestfriends Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 278.7× 715 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-premiata-59853
Premiata Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 227.4× 1060 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-palm-angels-59883
Palm Angels Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 123.5× 1977 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-pelcare-59894
Pelcare Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 278.9× 653 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-baci-milano-60083
Baci Milano Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 215.5× 1006 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-dior-60105
Dior Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 129.7× 1757 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-fern-co-60138
Fern&Co Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 376.6× 622 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-fonfique-60158
Fonfique Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 276.3× 687 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-amina-muaddi-60406
Amina Muaddi Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 224.2× 1100 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-aveda-60437
Aveda Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 195.3× 1177 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-philipp-plein-60453
Philipp Plein Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 214.9× 1119 💰 Pricing
https://www.beymen.com/tr/brand-the-attico-60601
The Attico Markalı Tüm Ürünler | Beymen
pricing 69 425.9× 559 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/tr/ 500 68 0% 309.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1010 pages
facebook.com ×1001
tr.pinterest.com ×1001
instagram.com ×1001
twitter.com ×1001
blog.beymen.com ×1001
play.google.com ×1001
youtube.com ×1001
partner.beymen.com ×1000
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/beymen.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to beymen.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
beymen.com (this site) 78 83 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 2
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
hachimenroppi.com 89 88 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite beymen.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to beymen.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Beymen?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Beymen does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Beymen work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Beymen."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for beymen.com:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →