biaxol.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 74 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 79

biaxol.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

biaxol.com
📊

With a solid 70/100 ACRI, biaxol.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 67% of sites in the Radar. Within the social vertical, this places biaxol.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.2×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Partial bot access means the domain is visible to some AI systems but not accessible to others — ClaudeBot remain blocked.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 17 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than biaxol.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)74 × 0.40 = 29.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 29.6 + 10.4 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
27
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #553843
-22 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

biaxol.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 33%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why biaxol.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

49 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

112 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://biaxol.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Biaxol – Premium SARMs & Science-Driven Support
  • ✓ og:description — Your source for premium SARMs, peptides, stacks, and health support — backed by science and trusted worldwide.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

74/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
biaxol.com
54
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 27/100 — Low
Structured Elements 87 elements (87 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3931
Raw Density2.2%
💡Low structure score (27/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 87 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

31%
🗑️ 69%
Useful Content (126.4 KB)Bloat (272.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.2× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context73% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage77 / 105 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

45 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 68.3% · SNR: 0.46 · Signal: 32370 / Noise: 69802 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of biaxol.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Biaxol is a European-based online retailer specializing in research chemicals, particularly SARMs (Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators) and other supplements for
Target Audience
Fitness enthusiasts, bodybuilders, athletes, and individuals seeking performance enhancement supplements; customers interested in SARMs and related products.
Pricing Model
Variable, with a base price of €149 for EU shipping and €190 for international shipping, offering additional options for free delivery and gifts with purchase.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive FAQ section addressing a wide range of customer concerns and providing detailed information about products and shipping, combined with a focus on European-based operations and a commitment to product authenticity.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
FAQ section addressing order issues, shipping, and returnsDedicated product pages for individual SARMs (Ibutamoren, Testolone, Ostarine, etc.)Template-based landing pages for different categories (Sarm’s Questions, Orders, Payment, etc.)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited integration with third-party platforms
• Shipping restrictions based on location (not shipping to the US)
• Potential for order issues (missing products, damaged goods, delivery problems)
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-26

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time642 ms
Raw HTML Size399.1 KB
Visible Text Size126.4 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

642 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1634
DOM nodes
399 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://biaxol.com/wp-sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

134
internal links
24
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for biaxol.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/biaxol.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=biaxol.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
-41
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
13
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–69
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 54, but internal pages average only 13 — a -41-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2245
Avg Bloat
12.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://biaxol.com/faq
FAQ – Answers to Your Questions
pricing 69 42.9× 1565 💰 Pricing
https://biaxol.com/blog
Science-Backed Articles on SARMs, Supplements & Health
pricing 64 85.3× 680 💰 Pricing
https://biaxol.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://biaxol.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 64 0% 85.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 69 0% 42.9× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
t.me ×2
biaxol.co.uk ×2
cookiedatabase.org ×2
us.biaxol.com ×2
tiktok.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/biaxol.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to biaxol.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
biaxol.com (this site) 54 70 WordPress 3.2× 2
e-nisino.com 79 88 WordPress 5.5× 2 Compare →
etlikcivciv.com 79 84 WordPress 4.0× 1 Compare →
support.yumapos.ru 79 83 WordPress 2.0× 1 Compare →
mareecielo.it 79 88 WordPress 3.8× 4 Compare →
satooya.wancat.info 79 84 WordPress 1.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite biaxol.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to biaxol.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Biaxol",
  "url": "https://biaxol.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://biaxol.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for biaxol.com:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+9 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →