blaze.today 72 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 68

blaze.today — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

blaze.today
📊

With a solid 76/100 ACRI, blaze.today is well-positioned for AI search — better than 83% of sites in the Radar. In the healthcare sector, blaze.today outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 5.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 5 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than blaze.today?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 30.8 + 16.0 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
29
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
90
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #81136
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

blaze.today shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why blaze.today ranks here

Tech stackHugo
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

147 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://blaze.today/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Text Blaze
  • ✓ og:description — A powerful text expander Chrome extension. Optimize everything you type with auto text snippets, templates and macros.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, hairdresserfind.com.au (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
blaze.today
51
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hairdresserfind.com.au has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 29/100 — Low
Structured Elements 24 elements (21 lists, 3 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words968
Raw Density2.5%
💡Low structure score (29/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 21 list items, 3 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

61
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability61/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (5.8 KB)Bloat (28.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context88% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage28 / 32 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.1% · SNR: 0.20 · Signal: 1474 / Noise: 7240 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of blaze.today and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
AI Blaze is a SaaS tool that rewrites text, fixes grammar and punctuation, alters style and tone, and polishes writing using AI.
Target Audience
Content creators, marketers, writers, students, and anyone needing to improve their written communication.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered text rewriting with dynamic prompt creation and contextual awareness.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Example prompts demonstrate a focus on rewriting and paraphrasing, suggesting SEO targeting around these terms.The use of placeholders within prompts indicates an attempt to create dynamic content for SEO.
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Limited integration capabilities (currently none mentioned)
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHugo
AI-Readiness Score90/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time561 ms
Raw HTML Size34.0 KB
Visible Text Size5.8 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

561 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

523
DOM nodes
34 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

58
internal links
4
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 51/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for blaze.today
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/blaze.today" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=blaze.today" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 52 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
51
Single-page score
+15
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 52 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
24%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
91494
Avg Bloat
16.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
33
⚠️
33 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 33 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://blaze.today/aiblaze/docs/rewrite/
AI Blaze | How to Rewrite Text With AI Blaze
docs 90 4.2× 1223
https://blaze.today/blog/mac-productivity-apps/
10 Best Mac Productivity Apps for 2026 (Compared)
pricing 90 4.8× 1865 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/datablaze/docs/bsql/
Data Blaze | BSQL Reference
pricing 82 4.0× 1958 💰 Pricing
https://blaze.today/formulas/reference/
Text Blaze | Formula Reference
pricing 82 2.9× 7085 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/datablaze/docs/zapier/
Data Blaze | Zapier
pricing 82 4.2× 1081 💰 Pricing
https://blaze.today/datablaze/docs/webhooks/
Data Blaze | Webhooks
pricing 82 4.3× 956 💰 Pricing
https://blaze.today/datablaze/docs/permsisions/
Data Blaze | Permissions and Sharing
pricing 82 4.6× 695 💰 Pricing
https://blaze.today/datablaze/docs/quickstart/
Data Blaze | Getting Started with Data Blaze
docs 82 4.2× 1029
https://blaze.today/datablaze/docs/db_and_snippets/
Data Blaze | Reading and updating your data from anywhere
pricing 82 3.6× 1568 💰 Pricing
https://blaze.today/blog/sales-tech-stack/
How to Build a Great B2B Sales Tech Stack in 2026
pricing 82 3.9× 2451 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/ai-tools-for-document-analysis/
10 Best AI Tools for Document Analysis in 2026
pricing 82 4.8× 1673 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/best-ai-essay-generators/
7 Best AI Essay Generators for Writing, Citations, and Humanizing in 2026
pricing 82 4.2× 2051 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/best-gpt-chrome-extensions/
12 Best Free ChatGPT Chrome Extensions in 2026
pricing 82 5.0× 1592 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/hr-tech-stack/
How to Build an HR Tech Stack in 2026: Tools & Examples
pricing 82 4.1× 2424 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/ai-tools-for-productivity/
15 Best AI Tools for Boosting Productivity in 2026
pricing 82 4.5× 1879 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/websites-like-chatgpt/
15 Best Free AI Websites Like ChatGPT in 2026
pricing 82 4.3× 2004 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/apps-for-healthcare-professionals/
15 Best Apps for Healthcare Professionals to Save Time in 2026
pricing 82 4.2× 2374 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/ai-job-application-tools/
10 Best AI Job Application Tools & Bots in 2026
pricing 82 4.3× 1965 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/wordtune-alternatives/
16 Most Powerful Wordtune Alternatives in 2026 (Free & Paid)
pricing 82 3.8× 2723 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://blaze.today/blog/chatgpt-alternatives/
20 Best Free ChatGPT Alternatives You Should Try in 2026
pricing 82 3.8× 2579 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 52 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 28 80 0% 4.7× Healthy
/datablaze/ 9 75 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/aiblaze/ 3 80 0% 6.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 2 39 0% 35.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 77 0% 7.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/formulas/ 1 82 0% 2.9× Healthy
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/textblaze/ 1 29 0% 560.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 52 pages
community.blaze.today ×45
chromewebstore.google.com ×34
dashboard.blaze.today ×33
twitter.com ×27
linkedin.com ×27
facebook.com ×27
chrome.google.com ×11
data.blaze.today ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/blaze.today

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to blaze.today. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
blaze.today (this site) 51 76 Hugo 5.9× 1
netbraintech.com 76 87 WordPress 5.9× 1 Compare →
exportersindia.com 76 84 Custom / Proprietary 6.7× 1 Compare →
byramhealthcare.com 76 86 Sitecore 4.0× 1 Compare →
endo.id 76 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
alimed.com 75 87 Shopify 8.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite blaze.today when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to blaze.today. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Today",
  "url": "https://blaze.today",
  "logo": "https://blaze.today/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Today",
  "url": "https://blaze.today",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://blaze.today/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Today?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Today does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Today work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Today."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for blaze.today:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →