boliga.dk 59 D
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 57 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 65

boliga.dk — Global SEODiff Score 59/100

boliga.dk
📊

At 72/100, the ACRI for boliga.dk indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the infrastructure sector, boliga.dk outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 30% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

59
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (57) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (80×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 3 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than boliga.dk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)57 × 0.40 = 22.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)65 × 0.15 = 9.8
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 22.8 + 11.8 + 9.8
Global SEODiff Score = 59 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
52
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 9
40
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #166044
+11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 27%
Score 72/100

boliga.dk shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why boliga.dk ranks here

Tech stackAngular
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

43 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

107 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.boliga.dk
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Boliga - Find alle boliger og grunde til salg i Danmark
  • ✓ og:description — Start din boligsøgning på Boliga og find op mod 1.000 flere boliger til salg end på andre boligsider. Skøde, tilstandsrapport og selvsalg 🏡 🏚️ - Boliga.dk
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

57/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
boliga.dk
50
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 80.0x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 52/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 58 elements (58 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words707
Raw Density8.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (4.6 KB)Bloat (365.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context73% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage16 / 22 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 370.0 KB, but only 4.6 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.8% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1183 / Noise: 93543 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of boliga.dk and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Boliga.dk provides a comprehensive platform for users to search for properties for sale and rent, aggregating data from various sources
Target Audience
Homebuyers, renters, real estate agents, property investors, and anyone seeking information about the Danish housing market.
Pricing Model
Free to use for basic property searches and browsing; premium features and services (e.g., advanced alerts, agent management) available through paid subscriptions.
🔗 Integration Partners
Kort & Matrikelstyrelsen
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive data aggregation and integration from multiple sources (including public registers and agents) combined with a robust property database and a focus on Danish market specifics.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
FAQ schemaVej name variationsBoligagent management
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Difficulty finding properties due to variations in street names
• Delayed display of sales prices for andelsboliger
• Limited visibility of project properties
• Challenges with image permissions for real estate agents
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-08

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAngular
AI-Readiness Score40/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time849 ms
Raw HTML Size370.0 KB
Visible Text Size4.6 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

849 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

819
DOM nodes
370 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

65/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

72
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for boliga.dk
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/boliga.dk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=boliga.dk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
-45
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
5
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–52
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 50, but internal pages average only 5 — a -45-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
894
Avg Bloat
4.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://boliga.dk/faq
FAQ - Ofte stillede spørgsmål
pricing 52 46.5× 894 💰 Pricing
https://boliga.dk/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://boliga.dk/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 52 1% 46.5× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
selvsalg.dk ×1
instagram.com ×1
tilstandsrapport.dk ×1
boligagruppen.dk ×1
itunes.apple.com ×1
play.google.com ×1
dingeo.dk ×1
udenombanken.dk ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/boliga.dk

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to boliga.dk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
boliga.dk (this site) 50 72 Angular 80.0× 3
alihogar.es 75 82 PrestaShop 2.6× 3 Compare →
artaceaiului.ro 75 82 Custom / Proprietary 6.4× 3 Compare →
chlengenharia.pt 75 81 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 3 Compare →
nonpaints.com 75 83 Express 5.5× 3 Compare →
activlab.pl 75 86 Shopify 4.1× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite boliga.dk when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to boliga.dk. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Boliga",
  "url": "https://boliga.dk",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://boliga.dk/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Boliga?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Boliga does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Boliga work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Boliga."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for boliga.dk:

Current Score
72
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →