busandvan.com 71 B
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 56 🏗️ Arch 83

busandvan.com — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

busandvan.com
📊

busandvan.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places busandvan.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 3.4× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (55) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than busandvan.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)56 × 0.20 = 11.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 33.2 + 11.2 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
66
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #170939
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

busandvan.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why busandvan.com ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.4×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

98 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

719 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 16
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.busandvan.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → th
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
busandvan.com
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 66/100 — Good
Structured Elements 47 elements (47 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words363
Raw Density12.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

29%
🗑️ 71%
Useful Content (47.4 KB)Bloat (112.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage61 / 61 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

40 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 70.3% · SNR: 0.42 · Signal: 12125 / Noise: 28727 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of busandvan.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This is a website providing online bus, van, and public transport ticket booking services across Thailand, offering a comprehensive selection
Target Audience
Travelers, tourists, and residents in Thailand seeking to book bus and van tickets for various destinations.
Pricing Model
No explicit pricing model found. Services are offered on a per-ticket basis with varying prices based on route and time of booking.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive route coverage and a user-friendly online booking platform for bus and van travel in Thailand.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Route lists (multiple pages)FAQ sectionDestination pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of explicit pricing information
• Limited SEO depth for individual routes
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-09

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1126 ms
Raw HTML Size159.6 KB
Visible Text Size47.4 KB

Performance & Speed

56/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1126 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

662
DOM nodes
160 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.busandvan.com/6120111_2438.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

152
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → th
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for busandvan.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/busandvan.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=busandvan.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
-11
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
53
Avg across 10 pages · Range 39–57
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 63, but internal pages average only 53 — a -11-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
2704
Avg Bloat
82.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://busandvan.com/pricing
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/about
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/features
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/products
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/docs
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/case-studies
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/integrations
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์
pricing 57 81.6× 324 💰 Pricing
https://busandvan.com/faq
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์ - คำถามที่พบบ่อย
support 50 62.8× 189
https://busandvan.com/blog
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์ - บทความ
blog 39 68.9× 185
https://busandvan.com/contact
จองตั๋วรถทัวร์ รถตู้ รถ บขส. ออนไลน์ - ศูนย์บริการลูกค้า
support 39 122.7× 62
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/contact/ 1 39 0% 122.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 39 0% 68.9× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 50 0% 62.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 57 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
booking.busandvan.com ×10
accounts.busx.com ×7
facebook.com ×1
lin.ee ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/busandvan.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to busandvan.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
busandvan.com (this site) 63 74 Express 3.4× 1
photopoint.ee 86 87 Express 1.1× 2 Compare →
sos-ricambi.it 86 94 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-zubehoer.de 88 95 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
jagoanchetslot.com 87 92 Express 6.5× 8 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite busandvan.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to busandvan.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Busandvan",
  "url": "https://busandvan.com",
  "logo": "index_bat_files/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Busandvan?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Busandvan does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Busandvan work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Busandvan."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for busandvan.com:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →