cebraspe.org.br 65 C
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 79

cebraspe.org.br — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

cebraspe.org.br
📊

With a solid 84/100 ACRI, cebraspe.org.br is well-positioned for AI search — better than 98% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), cebraspe.org.br performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Token bloat registers at 13.9× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📈 Mar 19 ACRI +1 (67→68)
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -1 (68→67)
📈 Mar 15 ACRI +1 (67→68)
📉 Mar 10 ACRI -1 (68→67)
Does your site score higher than cebraspe.org.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 30.8 + 10.6 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
99
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #34325
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

cebraspe.org.br has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cebraspe.org.br ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat13.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

59 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

156 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.cebraspe.org.br/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliações e seleções de pessoas
  • ✓ og:description — O Cebraspe é a melhor banca em avaliações, seleções e certificações de pessoas, a mais justa e transparente, e a com as melhores provas.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cebraspe.org.br
68
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 99/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 148 elements (148 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words502
Raw Density29.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

62
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability62/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (8.6 KB)Bloat (110.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context79% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage15 / 19 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.8% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 2199 / Noise: 28342 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cebraspe.org.br and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website announces a public competition (concurso público) for 221 positions at the University of Brasília (UnB), offering various roles across different levels.
Target Audience
Job seekers, university students, and individuals seeking employment within the Brazilian public sector.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
The competition itself is the competitive moat – a large-scale recruitment process for a prestigious university.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited information about the specific roles and requirements
• Lack of a direct link to application process
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1229 ms
Raw HTML Size119.3 KB
Visible Text Size8.6 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1229 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1220
DOM nodes
119 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → http://homologacaoportal.cebraspe.org.br/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

147
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cebraspe.org.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cebraspe.org.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cebraspe.org.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 97 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
-15
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
53
Avg across 97 pages · Range 0–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 68, but internal pages average only 53 — a -15-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
42168
Avg Bloat
47.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/fundacao-universidade-de-brasilia-lanca-certame-com-221-oportunidades/
Fundação Universidade de Brasília lança certame com 221 oportunidades - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 41.6× 582
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/noticias/
Cebraspe | Notícias
other 67 38.9× 697
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-483/
Cebraspe Notícias 483 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
pricing 67 34.3× 706 💰 Pricing
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-485/
Cebraspe Notícias 485 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 41.1× 583
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-amplia-seguranca-em-concursos/
Cebraspe amplia segurança em concursos - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
pricing 67 46.4× 514 💰 Pricing
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-486/
Cebraspe Notícias 486 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
pricing 67 37.2× 648 💰 Pricing
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/unb-divulga-edital-para-acesso-por-meio-do-sisu-em-2015/
UnB divulga edital para acesso por meio do SiSU em 2015 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 45.3× 531
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/mpu-lanca-concurso-publico-com-25-oportunidades/
MPU lança concurso público com 25 oportunidades - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 38.5× 626
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-487/
Cebraspe Notícias 487 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 37.6× 642
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-488/
Cebraspe Notícias 488 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 36.1× 668
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/divulgada-a-lista-de-aprovados-no-sisu/
Divulgada a lista de aprovados no SiSU - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 47.6× 505
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-489/
Cebraspe Notícias 489 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 35.2× 688
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-490/
Cebraspe Notícias 490 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
pricing 67 37.3× 647 💰 Pricing
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-491/
Cebraspe Notícias 491 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 41.2× 584
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/mpu-prorroga-inscricoes-de-concurso-publico/
MPU prorroga inscrições de concurso público - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 38.5× 627
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-492/
Cebraspe Notícias 492 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 33.4× 722
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-493/
Cebraspe Notícias 493 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
pricing 67 41.6× 579 💰 Pricing
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/fundacao-universidade-de-brasilia-publica-retificacao-de-concurso/
Fundação Universidade de Brasília publica retificação de concurso - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 47.7× 505
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-494/
Cebraspe Notícias 494 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
pricing 67 42.8× 560 💰 Pricing
https://www.cebraspe.org.br/cespe-noticias-496/
Cebraspe Notícias 496 - Cebraspe | O melhor em avaliação de pessoas
other 67 39.2× 616
Showing 20 of 97 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/dpu-abre-143-oportunidades-para-niveis-medio-e-superior/ 1 67 0% 44.1× High JS Bloat
/universidade-divulga-oportunidades-para-transferencia-facultativa/ 1 67 0% 47.8× High JS Bloat
/termina-a-aplicacao-de-provas-do-pas-unb/ 1 54 0% 50.2× High JS Bloat
/fub-publica-resultado-final-da-prova-discursiva/ 1 54 0% 65.5× High JS Bloat
/universidade-disponibiliza-resultado-da-3-certificacao-de-habilidade-especifica-2/ 1 54 0% 70.3× High JS Bloat
/unb-divulga-terceira-chamada-do-sisu/ 1 54 0% 54.4× High JS Bloat
/cespe-divulga-quinta-chamada-do-pas-unb/ 1 54 0% 58.2× High JS Bloat
/inpi-disponibiliza-resultado-final-na-avaliacao-de-titulos/ 1 54 0% 63.3× High JS Bloat
/tribunal-de-justica-da-paraiba-encerra-inscricoes-preliminares-hoje-7-5/ 1 54 0% 51.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/fundacao-universidade-de-brasilia-publica-retificacao-de-concurso/ 1 67 0% 47.7× High JS Bloat
/cespe-noticias-494/ 1 67 0% 42.8× High JS Bloat
/anatel-divulga-resultados-e-convoca-para-curso-de-formacao-profissional/ 1 54 0% 59.0× High JS Bloat
/escs-publica-resultado-final-da-prova-objetiva/ 1 54 0% 61.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 97 pages
canalintegro.com.br ×88
security.cebraspe.org.br ×88
linkedin.com ×87
forms.office.com ×87
cespe.unb.br ×85
mec.gov.br ×1
brasil.gov.br ×1
sisu.mec.gov.br ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cebraspe.org.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cebraspe.org.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cebraspe.org.br (this site) 68 84 WordPress 13.9× 1
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cebraspe.org.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cebraspe.org.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Org",
  "url": "https://cebraspe.org.br",
  "logo": "https://cdn.cebraspe.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/favicon-02.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Org?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Org does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Org work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Org."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cebraspe.org.br:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
98
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →