cfu.net 57 D
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 52 ⚡ Perf 54 🏗️ Arch 81

cfu.net — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

cfu.net
📊

cfu.net shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 66/100, outperforming 57% of indexed domains. In the developer sector, cfu.net outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The bloated 25.8× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (52) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (26×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than cfu.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)52 × 0.40 = 20.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)54 × 0.20 = 10.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 20.8 + 10.8 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #50136
+38 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 43%
Score 66/100

cfu.net punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cfu.net ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat25.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

21 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

143 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.cfu.net/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cedar Falls Utilities
  • ✓ og:description — Cedar Falls Utilities provides utility and broadband services to residents and businesses of Cedar Falls, IA.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

52/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cfu.net
33
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words924
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

39
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability39/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (20.2 KB)Bloat (501.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio25.8× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context57% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 7 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 522.0 KB, but only 20.2 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (25.8×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.1% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 5182 / Noise: 128447 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time793 ms
Raw HTML Size522.0 KB
Visible Text Size20.2 KB

Performance & Speed

54/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

793 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1428
DOM nodes
522 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.cfu.net/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

122
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 33/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cfu.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cfu.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cfu.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 69 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
33
Single-page score
+9
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
42
Avg across 69 pages · Range 0–56
Topical Cohesion
23%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
30580
Avg Bloat
372.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
61
⚠️
61 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 61 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.cfu.net/internet-phone/resources/channel-guide
Channel Guide - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 132.8× 1282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cfu.net/features
Phone Service Features - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 89.6× 1147 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/utilities/natural-gas-service/natural-gas-safety
Natural Gas Safety - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 182.7× 544 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/utilities/rate-and-service-policies/natural-gas-rates
pricing 56 183.3× 544 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/news/aj-manfull-builds-a-better-home-with-cfu
AJ Manfull Builds a Better Home with CFU
pricing 56 190.8× 516 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/save-energy/energy-portfolio/community-solar-units
Simple Solar - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 165.4× 606 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/internet-phone/internet/plans-and-pricing
pricing 56 146.2× 764 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/internet-phone/business/internet
Business Internet Services - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 157.7× 702 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/internet-phone/internet/world-class-network
pricing 56 177.0× 586 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/internet-phone/phone/phone-service-features
Phone Service Features - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 89.6× 1147 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/utilities/electric-service/electric-safety
Electric Safety - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 153.5× 677 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/save-energy/residential-business/residential-rebates
Residential Rebates - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 149.9× 684 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/save-energy/residential-business/electric-vehicles
Electric Vehicles - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 124.6× 810 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/save-energy/residential-business/plant-a-tree-program
pricing 56 123.4× 818 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/save-energy/energy-portfolio/customer-owned-wind-solar
Customer-Owned Solar & Wind - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 182.8× 544 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/save-energy/residential-business/residential-services/tips-for-saving-energy
pricing 56 96.1× 1048 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/service-support/new-customers/welcome-to-cfu
New Customers - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 152.2× 677 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/news/cedar-falls-water-meets-all-safe-drinking-water-standards
Cedar Falls Water Meets All Safe Drinking Water Standards
pricing 56 96.9× 1030 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/our-company/board-of-trustees
Board Of Trustees - Cedar Falls Utilities
pricing 56 156.6× 631 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.cfu.net/utilities/rate-and-service-policies/current-rate-schedules-service-policies/customer-privacy-policy
pricing 56 30.6× 3569 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 69 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/utilities/ 16 47 0% 334.3× High JS Bloat
/internet-phone/ 13 50 0% 314.9× High JS Bloat
/save-energy/ 10 52 0% 172.2× High JS Bloat
/service-support/ 9 43 0% 513.2× High JS Bloat
/our-company/ 6 48 0% 353.3× High JS Bloat
/news/ 3 46 0% 1216.7× High JS Bloat
/community/ 2 36 0% 1806.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 46 0% 466.8× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 69 pages
myaccounts.cfu.net ×61
facebook.com ×61
browsehappy.com ×61
twitter.com ×61
bluecompass.com ×61
iowaonecall.com ×2
careers-cedarfallsutilities.icims.com ×2
play.google.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cfu.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cfu.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cfu.net (this site) 33 66 Custom / Proprietary 25.8× 1
forum.kirupa.com 58 73 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 1 Compare →
ohdear.app 58 69 Custom / Proprietary 7.4× 1 Compare →
24kitchen.nl 58 70 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 1 Compare →
openbsdjumpstart.org 58 67 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 1 Compare →
bandmaid.tokyo 58 76 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cfu.net when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cfu.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Cfu",
  "url": "https://cfu.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://cfu.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cfu?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cfu does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cfu work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cfu."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cfu.net:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →