cgsecurity.org 74 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 100

cgsecurity.org — Global SEODiff Score 74/100

cgsecurity.org
📊

At 77/100, the ACRI for cgsecurity.org indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the social vertical, this places cgsecurity.org above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 8.6× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

74
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 10
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than cgsecurity.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 28.8 + 16.0 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 74 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
95
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #39504
+11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

cgsecurity.org shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cgsecurity.org ranks here

Tech stackMediaWiki
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat8.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

47 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

152 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — CGSecurity - Data recovery: TestDisk & PhotoRec
  • ✓ og:description — TestDisk and PhotoRec are free and open source data recovery software tools designed to recover lost partition, unerase deleted files, carve lost files.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cgsecurity.org
53
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 27 elements (23 lists, 4 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words238
Raw Density11.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (2.2 KB)Bloat (16.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.6× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage5 / 5 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.4% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 560 / Noise: 4279 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cgsecurity.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website provides resources and tools for recovering data from damaged hard disks, focusing on techniques like cloning and utilizing
Target Audience
Data recovery specialists, system administrators, and technically proficient users seeking to recover data from failing hard drives.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
TestDiskdd_rescue
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive data recovery techniques and tools, including a focus on handling damaged sectors and utilizing advanced recovery methods like ddrescue.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkMediaWiki
AI-Readiness Score95/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time710 ms
Raw HTML Size18.9 KB
Visible Text Size2.2 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

710 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

233
DOM nodes
19 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, must-revalidate, max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googlesyndication.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.cgsecurity.org/sitemap.xml.gz
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

40
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cgsecurity.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cgsecurity.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cgsecurity.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 92 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
+6
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 92 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
36957
Avg Bloat
14.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/DamagedHD
Damaged Hard Disk - CGSecurity
other 90 4.5× 1463
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Damaged_Hard_DiskIT
Damaged Hard DiskIT - CGSecurity
other 90 4.5× 1449
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Damaged_Hard_Disk
Damaged Hard Disk - CGSecurity
other 90 4.4× 1459
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Articles
Articles - CGSecurity
pricing 85 8.5× 803 💰 Pricing
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Add_your_own_extension_to_PhotoRec
Add your own extension to PhotoRec - CGSecurity
other 85 8.0× 643
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Advanced_FAT_Repair
Advanced FAT Repair - CGSecurity
other 85 5.2× 1001
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Advanced_FAT_Repair_IT
Advanced FAT Repair IT - CGSecurity
other 85 5.6× 927
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/After_Using_PhotoRec
After Using PhotoRec - CGSecurity
other 85 5.0× 1464
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Apr%C3%A8s_l%27utilisation_de_PhotoRec
Après l'utilisation de PhotoRec - CGSecurity
other 85 6.1× 1006
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Ausfuehren_von_TestDisk
Ausführen von TestDisk - CGSecurity
other 85 7.5× 626
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Ausf%C3%BChren_von_TestDisk
Ausführen von TestDisk - CGSecurity
other 85 7.5× 620
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/CmosPwd
CmosPwd - CGSecurity
other 85 5.3× 1101
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Ausf%C3%BChrliches_Wiederherstellungsbeispiel
Schritt für Schritt Wiederherstellungsbeispiel - CGSecurity
pricing 85 5.5× 1648 💰 Pricing
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Besch%C3%A4digte_Festplatte
Beschädigte Festplatte - CGSecurity
other 85 7.0× 836
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/CDRW_DE
CDRW DE - CGSecurity
other 85 9.1× 553
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/CDRW
CDRW - CGSecurity
other 85 8.6× 547
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/CV_Christophe_GRENIER
CV Christophe GRENIER - CGSecurity
pricing 85 5.5× 1893 💰 Pricing
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/CDRW_IT
Dispositivi CDRW - CGSecurity
other 85 9.4× 505
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Challenge_DC3_2012
Challenge DC3 2012 - CGSecurity
other 85 6.4× 703
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Compilar_DOS
Compilar DOS - CGSecurity
other 85 7.8× 563
Showing 20 of 92 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/wiki/ 82 67 0% 16.5× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 92 pages
forum.cgsecurity.org ×82
gnu.org ×82
mailman.global-sp.net ×7
freedos.org ×6
bootdisk.com ×6
finkproject.org ×6
delorie.com ×5
knopper.net ×4
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cgsecurity.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cgsecurity.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cgsecurity.org (this site) 53 77 MediaWiki 8.6× 1
danmonshop.se 78 89 WordPress 9.3× 1 Compare →
eike-klima-energie.eu 78 90 WordPress 7.8× 1 Compare →
thathashtagshow.com 78 84 WordPress 7.5× 1 Compare →
epto.it 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 6.6× 2 Compare →
supply.coreandmain.com 78 90 WordPress 10.9× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cgsecurity.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cgsecurity.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Cgsecurity",
  "url": "https://cgsecurity.org",
  "logo": "https://cgsecurity.org/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Cgsecurity",
  "url": "https://cgsecurity.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://cgsecurity.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cgsecurity?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cgsecurity does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cgsecurity work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cgsecurity."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cgsecurity.org:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →