chargers.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 71 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 82

chargers.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

chargers.com
📊

chargers.com achieves a 71/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, chargers.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The 12.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than chargers.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)71 × 0.40 = 28.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 28.4 + 9.4 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
59
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #68175
+24 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

chargers.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why chargers.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat12.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

51 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

150 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.chargers.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Los Angeles Chargers
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

71/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
chargers.com
54
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 59/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 170 elements (170 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1656
Raw Density10.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

50
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability50/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (39.3 KB)Bloat (467.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio12.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context36% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage44 / 121 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 36% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.3% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 10049 / Noise: 119747 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of chargers.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Los Angeles Chargers website provides a comprehensive collection of video content centered around the team, its players, and its
Target Audience
Los Angeles Chargers fans, NFL enthusiasts, and general sports fans interested in behind-the-scenes content and team coverage.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
ToyotaVerizonUCLA HealthParamount+Hyundai
🏆 Competitive Moat
Exclusive access to behind-the-scenes content and player perspectives, combined with a strong focus on fan engagement and community building.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Video content libraryPlayer profilesTeam history pagesGame highlights
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO optimization of video content
• Lack of structured data for video content (e.g., transcripts, captions)
• Potential for content fragmentation across different platforms
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serveristio-envoy
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time713 ms
Raw HTML Size507.0 KB
Visible Text Size39.3 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

713 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2865
DOM nodes
507 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=5
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.chargers.com/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

191
internal links
60
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for chargers.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/chargers.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=chargers.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 65 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
-19
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
35
Avg across 65 pages · Range 0–64
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 54, but internal pages average only 35 — a -19-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
22999
Avg Bloat
304.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.chargers.com/video/features
Chargers Featured Videos | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 64 18.3× 5188 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/tickets/mobile-ticketing/guide
Los Angeles Chargers Mobile Ticketing | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
blog 56 95.3× 584
https://www.chargers.com/team/rosters
Roster | Los Angeles Chargers
pricing 56 107.3× 878 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/front-office-roster/
Chargers Front Office Roster | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 56 43.1× 1526 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/
Chargers History | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 56 84.0× 817
https://www.chargers.com/team/standings/
Chargers Standings | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 56 85.8× 745 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/stats/
Chargers Stats | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 56 93.7× 1041 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/legends/
Chargers Legends | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 56 37.9× 2350
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/uniform-history/1960-1984
Chargers Uniform History 1960-1984 | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 56 94.4× 663
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/uniform-history/2000-2019
Chargers Uniform History 2000-2019 | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 56 98.1× 626
https://www.chargers.com/team/front-office-roster/alex-g-spanos
Alex G. Spanos
pricing 56 73.1× 750 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/players-roster/
Chargers Player Roster | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 56 107.1× 882 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/depth-chart
Chargers Depth Chart | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 56 129.9× 550 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/uniform-history/1985-1999
Chargers Uniform History 1985-1999 | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 46 160.8× 375
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/uniform-history/2020-present
Chargers Uniform History 2020- Present | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 46 136.4× 429
https://www.chargers.com/team/coaches-roster/
Chargers Coaches Roster | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 46 237.4× 272
https://www.chargers.com/team/coaches-roster/mobile
Chargers Coaches Roster | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 46 164.3× 266
https://www.chargers.com/team/injury-report/
Chargers Injury Report | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
pricing 46 165.8× 405 💰 Pricing
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/matchups/denver-broncos
Chargers Matchup History Denver Broncos | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 36 473.4× 129
https://www.chargers.com/team/history/matchups/detroit-lions
Chargers Matchup History Detroit Lions | Los Angeles Chargers - chargers.com
about 36 468.6× 129
Showing 20 of 65 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/team/ 53 41 0% 371.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/video/ 1 64 0% 18.3× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/tickets/ 1 56 0% 95.3× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/chargers.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to chargers.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
chargers.com (this site) 54 71 Custom / Proprietary 12.9× 0
coicomi.com 79 86 Custom / Proprietary 14.8× 4 Compare →
naro-fominsk.prostitutkimax.top 79 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 0 Compare →
golitsyno.prostitutkimax.top 79 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 0 Compare →
satur.sk 79 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
allani.pl 79 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite chargers.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to chargers.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Chargers",
  "url": "https://chargers.com",
  "logo": "https://static.clubs.nfl.com/chargers/cfdx9n6qx0ue3zu00sqn",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Chargers",
  "url": "https://chargers.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://chargers.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Chargers?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Chargers does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Chargers work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Chargers."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for chargers.com:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →