cleanbrowsing.org 77 B
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 93

cleanbrowsing.org — Global SEODiff Score 77/100

cleanbrowsing.org
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for cleanbrowsing.org is strong: an ACRI of 79/100 places it ahead of 91% of domains in the index. In the infrastructure sector, cleanbrowsing.org outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 3.6× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

77
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 26 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 16 ACRI +2 (67→69)
Does your site score higher than cleanbrowsing.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 34.0 + 12.4 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 77 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
63
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #10894
+8 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

cleanbrowsing.org shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cleanbrowsing.org ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

144 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://cleanbrowsing.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — CleanBrowsing | DNS Content Filtering Service
  • ✓ og:description — Affordable DNS filtering that blocks malware, adult content, and unwanted sites. Protect schools, families, and businesses at the network level.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cleanbrowsing.org
69
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 63/100 — Good
Structured Elements 120 elements (120 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1003
Raw Density12.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (17.2 KB)Bloat (44.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context61% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage48 / 79 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

35 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 72.3% · SNR: 0.38 · Signal: 4393 / Noise: 11455 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cleanbrowsing.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps engineering teams plan sprints more effectively by identifying resource conflicts and optimizing task allocation in real-time,
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, scrum masters, and software development teams.
Pricing Model
Offers a free plan with limited features, and paid tiers ranging from $12 to $25 per user per month, based on team size and desired functionality.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and conflict detection, providing a more dynamic and intelligent alternative to traditional planning tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesBlog posts on sprint planning best practices
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Difficulty visualizing resource allocation
• Manual conflict resolution
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernoc.org/cdn
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1144 ms
Raw HTML Size61.9 KB
Visible Text Size17.2 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1144 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

656
DOM nodes
62 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://cleanbrowsing.org/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

103
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 69/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cleanbrowsing.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cleanbrowsing.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cleanbrowsing.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 148 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
69
Single-page score
-21
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
49
Avg across 148 pages · Range 0–85
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 69, but internal pages average only 49 — a -21-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
27%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
32135
Avg Bloat
15.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/domains-to-allow-for-disney-plus/
How to Create a Whitelist-Only DNS Environment
pricing 85 6.8× 1212 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/domains-to-allow-for-microsoft/
How to Create a Whitelist-Only DNS Environment
pricing 85 6.8× 1212 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/bulk-upload-a-subnet-to-cleanbrowsing/
Bulk Upload Subnets to CleanBrowsing
pricing 75 11.5× 675 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/how-to-restrict-dns-changes-on-a-chromebook/
How to Restrict DNS Changes on a Chromebook – CleanBrowsing Help
docs 72 29.9× 613
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/debug-dns-on-google-chromebook/
Debug DNS on Google ChromeBook
pricing 65 19.2× 345 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/how-to-disable-youtube-on-a-nintento-switch-add-a-custom-cleanbrowsing-dns/
Disable YouTube on Nintendo Switch
pricing 65 14.5× 478 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/dynamically-update-macos-dns-when-traveling/
Update CleanBrowsing with a Dynamic IP (Scheduled Task)
pricing 65 14.2× 494 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/update-cleanbrowsing-with-public-ips-that-change-w-generic/
Update CleanBrowsing with a Dynamic IP (Scheduled Task)
pricing 65 14.2× 494 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/configure-cleanbrowsing-w-mosyle-dot/
Mosyle DoT DNS Setup Guide
pricing 65 18.9× 356 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/dynamic-ip-update-cleanbrowsing/
Update CleanBrowsing with a Dynamic IP (Scheduled Task)
pricing 65 14.2× 494 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/how-to-monitor-dns-activity/
How to Monitor DNS Activity
pricing 60 22.2× 283 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/how-to-configure-predefined-platforms/
How to Configure Predefined Platforms – CleanBrowsing Help
docs 59 64.4× 277
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/servfail-error-with-gt-ax11000-wan-dns/
SERVFAIL Error with GT-AX11000 WAN DNS – CleanBrowsing Help
docs 59 80.2× 221
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/working-with-windows-command-prompt-and-macos-terminal/
Working with Windows Command Prompt and macOS Terminal – CleanBrowsing Help
pricing 59 40.1× 472 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/data-retention-and-log-management-with-trunc/
Data Retention and Log Management with Trunc – CleanBrowsing Help
docs 59 67.2× 274
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/change-dns-on-a-actiontex-q1000/
CenturyLink Q1000 DNS Setup Guide
pricing 57 27.2× 245 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/change-dns-on-zyxel-c1100z-centurylink/
CenturyLink C1100Z DNS Setup Guide
pricing 57 25.1× 267 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/change-dns-on-actiontex-gt784wnv-centurylink/
CenturyLink GT784WNV DNS Setup Guide
pricing 57 28.1× 237 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/change-dns-on-a-m1000-c1000-and-w1000-zyxel-pk5001z-centurylink/
CenturyLink PK5001Z DNS Setup Guide
pricing 57 25.4× 263 💰 Pricing
https://cleanbrowsing.org/help/docs/configure-cleanbrowsing-with-simple-dnscrypt-windows/ docs 56 13.6× 206
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/help/ 138 50 0% 15.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 56 0% 13.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 56 0% 13.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 56 0% 10.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 47 0% 14.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cleanbrowsing.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cleanbrowsing.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cleanbrowsing.org (this site) 69 79 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 2
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
kobekyo.com 90 94 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cleanbrowsing.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 4 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

56
Homepage ACRI
53
Inner Avg ACRI
+3
ACRI Delta
10%
Homepage Ghost
7%
Inner Avg Ghost
2
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
56 10% about https://cleanbrowsing.org/about
56 10% blog https://cleanbrowsing.org/blog
47 0% support https://cleanbrowsing.org/contact
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

0 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

0
Total Links
0
Unique Domains
0.0
Avg/Page
0%
Diversity
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cleanbrowsing.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cleanbrowsing?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cleanbrowsing does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cleanbrowsing work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cleanbrowsing."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cleanbrowsing.org:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →