cls.cn 53 D
🛡️ SEO 43 🤖 GEO 59 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 61

cls.cn — Global SEODiff Score 53/100

cls.cn
📊

cls.cn achieves a 65/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places cls.cn above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. Token bloat registers at 13.2× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

53
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (43) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 20 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than cls.cn?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)43 × 0.25 = 10.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)59 × 0.40 = 23.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)61 × 0.15 = 9.2
Weighted sum = 10.8 + 23.6 + 9.4 + 9.2
Global SEODiff Score = 53 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
15
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #55274
+40 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 45%
Score 65/100

cls.cn punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cls.cn ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat13.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

43/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

59 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

397 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

59/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cls.cn
33
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 15/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 4 elements (4 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words562
Raw Density0.7%
💡Low structure score (15/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 4 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

37
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability37/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (45/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (14.0 KB)Bloat (171.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context16% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 25 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 16% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.5% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 3580 / Noise: 43844 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerCW
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1432 ms
Raw HTML Size185.2 KB
Visible Text Size14.0 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1432 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1045
DOM nodes
185 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

61/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://cls.cn/map.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

228
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 33/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cls.cn
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cls.cn" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cls.cn" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 76 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
33
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
31
Avg across 76 pages · Range 0–39
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
4497
Avg Bloat
57.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298959
中信证券:伊朗局势的关键信号与潜在走向
other 39 78.7× 84
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298917
以军称首次打击伊朗首都中心地带目标
other 36 59.0× 82
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298952
独家|萝卜快跑临时暂停阿联酋境内无人驾驶服务
other 36 73.3× 62
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298932
星德胜:累计回购20万股股份用于员工持股计划或股权激励
other 36 66.8× 66
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298916
罗博特科:截至目前 ficonTEC与瑞士某头部客户签订了两条完整的自动化产线设备订单
other 36 67.5× 68
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298908
福龙马:预中标6个环卫服务项目 合计首年服务费金额1961.15万元
other 36 64.7× 68
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298898
艾迪药业:实控人之一、董事长傅和亮拟1000万元—1500万元增持股份
other 36 67.2× 66
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298958
中信证券:伊朗局势仍在快速变化 预计难以一次性按最终情景推测并演绎
other 36 71.1× 64
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298956
财联社3月1日电,国际能源署(IEA)称,正密切关注中东局势及其对全球油气市场和贸易流动的潜在影响。
other 36 67.6× 61
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298957
中信证券:预计涨价驱动的行情在3月还将持续
other 36 74.5× 62
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298954
沙特首都利雅得东部传来巨大爆炸声
other 36 66.8× 63
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298955
广钢气体:高级管理人员刘琼因达到法定退休年龄退休
other 36 68.2× 66
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298967
财联社3月1日电,吉利汽车在港交所公告,2月汽车销量206160辆,同比增长约1%。
other 36 64.5× 64
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298965
以色列宣称打死40名伊朗军事指挥官
other 36 66.6× 63
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298964
两连胜 中国男篮世预赛战胜中国台北队
other 36 63.3× 64
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298963
齐心集团:MRO工业品平台已服务多家大型企业客户
other 36 65.8× 66
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298962
伊朗第一副总统要求政府在战时确保国家运行持续稳定
other 36 69.2× 63
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298961
伊朗最高国家安全委员会秘书:美以将遭受“从未感受过的打击”
other 36 66.4× 63
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298960
卧龙电驱:自愿披露2025年度部分财务数据 推进H股发行上市
other 36 65.0× 68
https://www.cls.cn/detail/2298953
伊朗国家电视台大楼附近区域发生爆炸
other 36 64.8× 63
Showing 20 of 76 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/detail/ 66 36 0% 66.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 76 pages
fisbaobei.ifcert.cn ×66
beian.miit.gov.cn ×66
service.weibo.com ×66
beian.gov.cn ×66
shjbzx.cn ×66
static.sse.com.cn ×22
static.cninfo.com.cn ×18
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cls.cn

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cls.cn. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cls.cn (this site) 33 65 Next.js 13.2× 0
costadaurada.cat 58 79 Drupal 12.0× 0 Compare →
wbphidcl.com 58 79 Custom / Proprietary 10.5× 0 Compare →
woospeak.com 58 74 Ruby on Rails 10.0× 0 Compare →
toriamos.com 58 88 WordPress 14.8× 1 Compare →
euro-markt.pl 58 72 Shopify 13.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cls.cn when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cls.cn. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Cls",
  "url": "https://cls.cn",
  "logo": "https://cdnjs.cls.cn/www/20200601/image/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Cls",
  "url": "https://cls.cn",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://cls.cn/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cls?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cls does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cls work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cls."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cls.cn:

Current Score
65
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →