cmo.com.au 76 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 75 🏗️ Arch 55

cmo.com.au — Global SEODiff Score 76/100

cmo.com.au
📊

With a solid 81/100 ACRI, cmo.com.au is well-positioned for AI search — better than 95% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, cmo.com.au outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 4.4× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

76
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Architecture (55) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 12
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than cmo.com.au?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)75 × 0.20 = 15.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)55 × 0.15 = 8.2
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 33.6 + 15.0 + 8.2
Global SEODiff Score = 76 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
55
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 31%
Rank #307257
-25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

cmo.com.au ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 31%) than in AI search (Top 5%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cmo.com.au ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

53 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

142 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://foundryco.com/our-brands/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
  • ✓ og:description — Discover Foundry’s trusted B2B and B2C tech brands that help marketers reach and engage decision-makers through insight-driven media & data.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cmo.com.au
66
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 55/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 166 elements (166 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1846
Raw Density9.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

22%
🗑️ 78%
Useful Content (33.6 KB)Bloat (114.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context12% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 25 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 12% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

15 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 77.3% · SNR: 0.29 · Signal: 8599 / Noise: 29279 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cmo.com.au and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Foundry provides media brands focused on tech, business, and cybersecurity, offering advertising solutions to reach targeted audiences across its network of publications and platforms.
Target Audience
Tech marketers, CIOs, IT leaders, cybersecurity professionals, and business executives seeking to reach specific tech-savvy audiences.
Pricing Model
Advertising-based; custom pricing based on reach and engagement.
🔗 Integration Partners
GitHubBloombergVS CodeMac OS X
🏆 Competitive Moat
A network of established, trusted media brands with deep audience penetration and specialized content targeting key tech and business sectors.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesLatest from... links
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-14

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time498 ms
Raw HTML Size148.0 KB
Visible Text Size33.6 KB

Performance & Speed

75/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

498 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1014
DOM nodes
148 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=300, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

55/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

13
internal links
197
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 66/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cmo.com.au
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cmo.com.au" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cmo.com.au" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
66
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
67
Avg across 10 pages · Range 67–67
Total Words
14990
Avg Bloat
20.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
10
⚠️
10 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 10 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cmo.com.au/pricing
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/about
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/products
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/features
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/blog
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/docs
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/case-studies
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/contact
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/faq
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cmo.com.au/integrations
Explore Our Award-Winning Tech Media Brands | Foundry
pricing 67 20.2× 1499 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 67 0% 20.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
techhive.com ×10
intent.foundryco.com ×10
events.idg.com ×10
infoworld.com ×10
cio.com ×10
resources.foundryco.com ×10
x.com ×10
events.foundryco.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cmo.com.au

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cmo.com.au. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cmo.com.au (this site) 66 81 WordPress 4.4× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cmo.com.au when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cmo.com.au. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cmo.com.au:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →