commerce.com 65 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 58 ⚡ Perf 54 🏗️ Arch 94

commerce.com — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

commerce.com
📊

commerce.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. Compared to other social sites (avg score: 57), commerce.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (54) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (178×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 12 ACRI +1 (43→44)
Does your site score higher than commerce.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)58 × 0.40 = 23.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)54 × 0.20 = 10.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 23.2 + 10.8 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
34
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 44%
Rank #440469
-25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

commerce.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 44%) than in AI search (Top 19%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why commerce.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

40 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

121 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.commerce.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Commerce: We’re powering what’s next
  • ✓ og:description — Commerce helps businesses grow on their terms with flexible, connected tools like BigCommerce, Feedonomics and Makeswift.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

58/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
commerce.com
44
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 34/100 — Low
Structured Elements 14 elements (14 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words411
Raw Density3.4%
💡Low structure score (34/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 14 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

46
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability46/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (2.9 KB)Bloat (516.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context64% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 11 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 519.8 KB, but only 2.9 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.4% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 746 / Noise: 132323 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of commerce.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Commerce LLC provides a suite of AI-powered commerce solutions, including BigCommerce, Feedonomics, and Makeswift, designed to help businesses scale their
Target Audience
E-commerce business owners, marketing teams, developers, and operations managers seeking to optimize their online stores and expand their reach.
Pricing Model
Multiple pricing tiers available, with BigCommerce offering a subscription-based model and Feedonomics and Makeswift providing custom pricing based on usage and features.
🔗 Integration Partners
BigCommerceFeedonomicsMakeswift
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-driven data aggregation and optimization across multiple channels, combined with a modular and adaptable architecture, providing a competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving commerce landscape.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
BigCommerceFeedonomicsMakeswiftVisit BigCommercePress and newsContactFAQ
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Need for AI-driven data aggregation and optimization
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-20

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time925 ms
Raw HTML Size519.8 KB
Visible Text Size2.9 KB

Performance & Speed

54/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

925 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

907
DOM nodes
520 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.commerce.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

30
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for commerce.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/commerce.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=commerce.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
-27
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
17
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–61
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 44, but internal pages average only 17 — a -27-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1760
Avg Bloat
57.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://commerce.com/about
Who We Are | Commerce
about 61 166.1× 667
https://commerce.com/faq
Frequently asked questions about Commerce
pricing 61 95.8× 838 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://commerce.com/contact
Contact Us | Commerce
support 51 308.0× 255
https://commerce.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://commerce.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://commerce.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://commerce.com/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://commerce.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://commerce.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://commerce.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 61 1% 95.8× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 51 1% 308.1× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 61 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
linkedin.com ×3
makeswift.com ×3
youtube.com ×3
feedonomics.com ×3
bigcommerce.com ×3
investors.commerce.com ×3
x.com ×3
instagram.com ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/commerce.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to commerce.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
commerce.com (this site) 44 75 Next.js 178.3× 1
adaptation-fund.org 69 88 WordPress 15.6× 1 Compare →
eu.wikipedia.org 69 85 MediaWiki 20.6× 1 Compare →
lufthansa-city-center.com 69 83 WordPress 3.9× 1 Compare →
lesd.k12.or.us 69 78 WordPress 8.0× 1 Compare →
mida.gov.my 69 81 WordPress 19.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite commerce.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to commerce.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Commerce?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Commerce does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Commerce work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Commerce."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for commerce.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →