conduit.xyz 69 C
🛡️ SEO 64 🤖 GEO 70 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 78

conduit.xyz — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

conduit.xyz
📊

conduit.xyz achieves a 68/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), conduit.xyz performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 15% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. A 9.1× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (64) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than conduit.xyz?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)64 × 0.25 = 16.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)70 × 0.40 = 28.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 16.0 + 28.0 + 13.0 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #47091
+34 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

conduit.xyz punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why conduit.xyz ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat9.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

64/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

38 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

138 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 11
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.conduit.xyz
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Conduit: Powerful Chain Infrastructure
  • ✓ og:description — Deploy, customize, and scale your chain on Conduit. Get dedicated infrastructure for appchains, onchain games, DEXs, ecosystems, and more.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

70/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
conduit.xyz
38
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1666
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (10.6 KB)Bloat (86.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context2% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 166 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 2% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.1% · SNR: 0.12 · Signal: 2705 / Noise: 22031 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time549 ms
Raw HTML Size96.6 KB
Visible Text Size10.6 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

549 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1089
DOM nodes
97 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.conduit.xyz/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

97
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 38/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for conduit.xyz
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/conduit.xyz" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=conduit.xyz" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 74 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
38
Single-page score
+13
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
51
Avg across 74 pages · Range 0–75
Topical Cohesion
18%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
21964
Avg Bloat
45.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://conduit.xyz/about
Conduit: Powerful Chain Infrastructure
pricing 75 14.5× 1369 💰 Pricing
https://conduit.xyz/blog
The Conduit Blog
blog 75 15.2× 718
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/goldrush
GoldRush | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 75 14.7× 788
https://www.conduit.xyz/support
Support – Conduit
support 75 13.0× 971
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace
Integrations – Conduit Marketplace
integrations 67 22.1× 1567
https://conduit.xyz/integrations
Integrations – Conduit Marketplace
integrations 67 22.1× 1567
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/Allium
Allium | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 60 21.5× 486
https://www.conduit.xyz/pricing
Pricing – Conduit
pricing 57 34.3× 379 💰 Pricing
https://conduit.xyz/pricing
Pricing – Conduit
pricing 57 34.3× 379 💰 Pricing
https://www.conduit.xyz/features
Rollup Tooling and Features – Conduit
product 57 31.3× 389
https://www.conduit.xyz/platform
Rollup Platform – Conduit
product 57 41.0× 262
https://conduit.xyz/features
Rollup Tooling and Features – Conduit
product 57 31.3× 389
https://www.conduit.xyz/customers
Chain customers – Conduit
pricing 57 35.5× 376 💰 Pricing
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/dynamic
Dynamic | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 57 31.8× 306
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/everclear-xerc20
Everclear - xERC20 | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 57 44.6× 214
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/fun-xyz
Fun.xyz | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 57 45.3× 209
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/forta
Forta Firewall | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 57 29.5× 329
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/hexagate
Hexagate | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 57 43.7× 217
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/hypernative
Hypernative | Conduit Marketplace
pricing 57 32.6× 294 💰 Pricing
https://www.conduit.xyz/marketplace/halliday
Halliday | Conduit Marketplace
integrations 57 43.6× 218
Showing 20 of 74 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/marketplace/ 59 53 0% 45.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 2 57 0% 34.3× High JS Bloat
/features/ 2 57 0% 31.3× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/customers/ 1 57 0% 35.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 15 1% 392.4× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 75 0% 15.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 67 0% 22.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 75 0% 14.5× High JS Bloat
/support/ 1 75 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/platform/ 1 57 0% 41.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/conduit.xyz

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to conduit.xyz. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
conduit.xyz (this site) 38 68 Cloudflare Pages 9.1× 2
10x10v2d.com 63 88 Cloudflare Pages 8.4× 4 Compare →
newdesiporn.com 63 78 Cloudflare Pages 4.0× 0 Compare →
luxevegascasino.com 63 15 Cloudflare Pages 2.1× 0 Compare →
e-napolistore.it 63 79 Shopify 9.3× 2 Compare →
khelostar247.com 63 77 Nuxt.js 9.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite conduit.xyz when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to conduit.xyz. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Conduit?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Conduit does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Conduit work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Conduit."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for conduit.xyz:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
74
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →