convead.io 52 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 57 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 68

convead.io — Global SEODiff Score 52/100

convead.io
📊

convead.io achieves a 67/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, convead.io outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The bloated 46.9× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

52
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (29) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (47×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 11
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than convead.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)57 × 0.40 = 22.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 22.8 + 11.8 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 52 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
38
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #80626
+33 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 67/100

convead.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why convead.io ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat46.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

121 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://convead.io
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Convead – Email Marketing for Online Stores
  • ✓ og:description — Try out Convead for improvement of your online-store. Use a library of templates and ready-made campaigns. Start for free
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

57/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
convead.io
41
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 38/100 — Low
Structured Elements 30 elements (30 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words696
Raw Density4.3%
💡Low structure score (38/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 30 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

38
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability38/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (65/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (9.4 KB)Bloat (431.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio46.9× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context62% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage31 / 50 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 440.7 KB, but only 9.4 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (46.9×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.9% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 2403 / Noise: 110425 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of convead.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Convead is an automated eCommerce marketing platform designed to help businesses increase sales and improve customer engagement by providing unified
Target Audience
eCommerce business owners, marketing managers, and sales teams
Pricing Model
Not explicitly stated, but likely tiered based on features and usage.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackCRM Systems
🏆 Competitive Moat
The combination of visual analytics, a minimalist UI, and a focus on understanding individual customer behavior provides a unique competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of a comprehensive solution for eCommerce marketing
• Overwhelming data and complex interfaces
• Difficulty understanding customer behavior and segmenting audiences
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverddos-guard
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time954 ms
Raw HTML Size440.7 KB
Visible Text Size9.4 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

954 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1037
DOM nodes
441 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://convead.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

90
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 41/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for convead.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/convead.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=convead.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 48 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
41
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
40
Avg across 48 pages · Range 0–64
Topical Cohesion
24%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
14484
Avg Bloat
277.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://convead.io/services
Turnkey Email Marketing | Convead
pricing 64 44.2× 575 💰 Pricing
https://convead.io/ru/solutions/conversion-rate-optimisation
Увеличение конверсии интернет-магазина | Сценарии Convead
product 59 222.0× 256
https://convead.io/ru/solutions
Готовые маркетинговые сценарии Convead
pricing 59 157.3× 481 💰 Pricing
https://convead.io/ru/solutions/recover-abandoned-cart
Возврат брошенных корзин | Сценарии Convead
product 59 246.0× 238
https://convead.io/ru/features/popups
Игровые и классические виджеты (pop-ups) | Возможности Convead
product 59 257.5× 292 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://convead.io/ru/solutions/increase-subscriber-list
Увеличение базы подписчиков | Сценарии Convead
product 59 227.7× 247
https://convead.io/ru/solutions/increase-average-order-value
Увеличение среднего чека | Сценарии Convead
product 59 222.0× 254
https://convead.io/features/popups
In-game and Classic Widgets (Pop-ups) | Convead Features
product 59 162.8× 468 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://convead.io/ru/pricing
Тарифы | Стоимость сервиса Convead от 2500 руб
pricing 56 534.2× 917 💰 Pricing
https://convead.io/pricing
Pricing | Tariffs from 25$
pricing 56 431.6× 1116 💰 Pricing
https://convead.io/ru/about
Наша история | Convead
about 56 86.9× 562
https://convead.io/about
Our Story | Convead
about 56 38.0× 1189
https://convead.io/features/emails
Expert Email Campaigns | Convead Features
pricing 56 140.0× 519 💰 Pricing
https://convead.io/blog/automation
Automation | Convead Blog
blog 46 127.4× 461
https://convead.io/ru/blog/automation
Автоматизация | Блог Convead
blog 46 193.0× 333
https://convead.io/features/web-push
Instant 
Web Push Notifications | Convead Features
pricing 46 216.1× 443 💰 Pricing
https://convead.io/features
Convead Features
product 46 206.3× 364
https://convead.io/features/ecommerce-analytics
Online Store Analytics | Convead Features
product 46 209.9× 298
https://convead.io/ru/features/segmantation
Динамическая сегментация | Возможности Convead
product 46 232.4× 291
https://convead.io/features/cdp
Unified Customer Profile (CDP) | Convead Features
product 46 153.4× 397
Showing 20 of 48 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/ru/ 19 48 0% 454.3× High JS Bloat
/features/ 9 49 0% 181.0× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 8 38 0% 243.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 2 41 0% 177.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/services/ 1 64 0% 44.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 56 0% 431.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 56 0% 38.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 36 0% 252.1× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 48 pages
app.convead.io ×42
docs.convead.io ×23
docsru.convead.io ×19
facebook.com ×2
linkedin.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/convead.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to convead.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
convead.io (this site) 41 67 Custom / Proprietary 46.9× 0
stcn.com 66 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 0 Compare →
monipla.jp 66 79 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 0 Compare →
spy.zyzhan.com 66 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 0 Compare →
dublinchamber.org 66 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 0 Compare →
dssl.ru 66 75 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite convead.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to convead.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Convead",
  "url": "https://convead.io",
  "logo": "https://static.tildacdn.com/tild3161-6166-4636-a633-643536643364/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Convead",
  "url": "https://convead.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://convead.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Convead?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Convead does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Convead work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Convead."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for convead.io:

Current Score
67
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →