cos.tv 41 D
🛡️ SEO 34 🤖 GEO 24 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 46

cos.tv — Global SEODiff Score 41/100

cos.tv
📊

The AI-Readiness score for cos.tv is 59/100 — a middling result that leaves significant room to climb the Radar rankings. In the infrastructure sector, cos.tv outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

41
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (24) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (298×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 10 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than cos.tv?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)34 × 0.25 = 8.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)24 × 0.40 = 9.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)46 × 0.15 = 6.9
Weighted sum = 8.5 + 9.6 + 16.0 + 6.9
Global SEODiff Score = 41 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 10%
Rank #98240
+46 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 55%
Score 59/100

cos.tv punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cos.tv ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

34/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

39 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

179 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
  • ✓ og:description — Watch, like, comment your favorite videos, share with friends, earn COS reward, and work with community to support a better content ecosystem that powered by Contentos Blockchain.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

24/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cos.tv
15
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words21
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Very little extractable text detected (21 words). AI crawlers may be blocked from accessing the real page content — check the Ghost Ratio and Bot Access sections.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

25
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability25/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (25/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (162 B)Bloat (47.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 47.2 KB, but only 162 B is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.7% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 40 / Noise: 12042 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time531 ms
Raw HTML Size47.2 KB
Visible Text Size162 B

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

531 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

719
DOM nodes
47 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

46/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
0
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 15/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cos.tv
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cos.tv" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cos.tv" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
15
Single-page score
+11
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
27
Avg across 21 pages · Range 25–57
Total Words
121
Avg Bloat
1534.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cos.tv/api docs 57 0.6× 1
https://cos.tv/pricing
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
pricing 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/guides
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
blog 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/resources
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
blog 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/help
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
support 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/about
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
about 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/features
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
product 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/solutions
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
product 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/products
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
product 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/docs
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
docs 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/blog
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
blog 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/case-studies
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
social-proof 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/get-started
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
conversion 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/demo
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
conversion 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/integrations
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
integrations 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/faq
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
support 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/contact
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
support 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/support
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
support 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/trust
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
trust 25 1611.0× 6
https://cos.tv/security
COS.TV | Content platform on blockchain
trust 25 1611.0× 6
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/demo/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/support/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/help/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/trust/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 25 0% 1611.0× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cos.tv

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cos.tv. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cos.tv (this site) 15 59 Custom / Proprietary 298.3× 0
digwam.net 40 64 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
cinemonde.fr 40 66 Custom / Proprietary 13.5× 0 Compare →
mk-host4.com 40 63 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 0 Compare →
blueflintethanol.com 40 79 Custom / Proprietary 45.2× 0 Compare →
supermarktscanner.nl 40 64 Custom / Proprietary 18.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cos.tv when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cos.tv. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Cos",
  "url": "https://cos.tv",
  "logo": "https://cos.tv/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Cos",
  "url": "https://cos.tv",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://cos.tv/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cos.tv:

Current Score
59
Projected Score
74
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →