desknets.com 69 C
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 93

desknets.com — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

desknets.com
📊

desknets.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 84/100, outperforming 98% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, desknets.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.1×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than desknets.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 35.2 + 5.4 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 42%
Rank #416453
-39 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

desknets.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 42%) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why desknets.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

73 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

172 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.desknets.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 【公式】desknet's NEO - ノーコードでさらに進む業務改善
  • ✓ og:description — desknet's NEOは、あらゆる情報を集約し、ノーコードでアプリ作成することができるノーコードツール一体型グループウェアです。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
desknets.com
77
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 262 elements (260 lists, 2 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words613
Raw Density42.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

76
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability76/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

32%
🗑️ 68%
Useful Content (57.2 KB)Bloat (119.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage124 / 124 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

48 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 67.6% · SNR: 0.48 · Signal: 14631 / Noise: 30551 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of desknets.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
ノーコードでグループウェアと業務改善ツールを統合
Target Audience
企業・組織の業務効率化を追求する者
Pricing Model
未明示
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-26

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3178 ms
Raw HTML Size176.5 KB
Visible Text Size57.2 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3178 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2122
DOM nodes
176 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → http://www.desknets.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

257
internal links
16
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 77/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for desknets.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/desknets.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=desknets.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 825 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
77
Single-page score
-29
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
49
Avg across 825 pages · Range 0–75
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 77, but internal pages average only 49 — a -29-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
96%
Strong Alignment
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
134534
Avg Bloat
186.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
14
⚠️
14 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 14 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.desknets.com/neo/mynavi/nocode-review.html
2024年下期【徹底比較】3つの最新ノーコード・ローコードツールの機能性・コストを調査(マイナビニュース編集部)
other 75 17.4× 1289 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/mynavi/groupware-review.html
【2025年下期版】徹底比較!5つの主要グループウェアの機能性を調査(マイナビニュース編集部)
other 75 17.1× 1094 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/partner/
デスクネッツ ネオ 販売パートナー|グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 70 70.4× 873 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/releases/v95/
新バージョン機能紹介(V9.5/2025年9月)|グループウェア desknet's NEO(デスクネッツ ネオ 公式サイト)
pricing 70 58.6× 514 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/price/package.html
パッケージ版ライセンス価格表 | グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 70 37.8× 1641 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/releases/v86/
新バージョン機能紹介(V8.6/2024年9月)|グループウェア desknet's NEO(デスクネッツ ネオ 公式サイト)
pricing 70 52.5× 589 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/appsuite/appicon/
AppSuiteで使えるアプリアイコン ダウンロード
pricing 70 49.9× 2211 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/price/
クラウド版サービス価格・ご購入方法 | グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 70 56.4× 621 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/releases/v85/
新バージョン機能紹介(V8.5/2024年3月)|グループウェア desknet's NEO(デスクネッツ ネオ 公式サイト)
pricing 70 46.7× 728 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/mynavi/groupware-review-cost.html
【2025年下期版】徹底比較!国産グループウェア3製品のコスト優位性を調査(マイナビニュース編集部)
pricing 65 18.6× 411
https://www.desknets.com/neo/requirement/limit_neo.html
制限事項(desknet's NEO)│グループウェア desknet's NEO
other 62 41.8× 906
https://www.desknets.com/neo/requirement/limit_appsuite.html
制限事項(AppSuite)│グループウェア desknet's NEO
other 62 50.1× 614
https://www.desknets.com/neo/requirement/limit_mapp.html
制限事項(desknet's NEO アプリ)│グループウェア desknet's NEO
other 62 43.1× 540
https://www.desknets.com/neo/features/service-cloud/mail/
メールサービス - クラウド上のメールサーバーを低価格で提供 | グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 60 104.8× 230 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/features/
desknet's NEOの特長 | グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 60 129.4× 236 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/features/groupware/
グループウェアとは?導入メリット、主要製品比較と選び方を解説
pricing 60 68.6× 455 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.desknets.com/neo/features/systemconfig/
デスクネッツ ネオ パッケージ版システム構成例 | グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 60 168.5× 231 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/features/migration/
他社グループウェアからの乗り換え | グループウェア desknet's NEO
pricing 60 114.5× 239 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/column/nocode-pg.html
ノーコードでプログラミングをせずにシステム化!その成功事例を解説
pricing 60 125.1× 245 💰 Pricing
https://www.desknets.com/neo/column/data-management04.html
Excelで勤怠管理表を自作する方法とは?メリットと注意点を解説
pricing 60 119.2× 232 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/neo/ 497 53 0% 183.0× High JS Bloat
/ra-support/ 2 52 0% 42.4× High JS Bloat
/cloud/ 1 52 0% 94.7× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/desknets.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to desknets.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
desknets.com (this site) 77 84 WordPress 3.1× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite desknets.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to desknets.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Desknets",
  "url": "https://desknets.com",
  "logo": "https://desknets.com/neo/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Desknets?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Desknets does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Desknets work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Desknets."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for desknets.com:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →