display.io 61 C
🛡️ SEO 73 🤖 GEO 43 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 71
Radar → Domains → display.io

display.io — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

display.io
📊

display.io shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 70/100, outperforming 67% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places display.io above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 13.7× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but AI Readiness (43) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
73
🛡️ Traditional SEO
43
🤖 AI Readiness
74
⚡ Performance
71
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 17 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than display.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)73 × 0.25 = 18.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)43 × 0.40 = 17.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)71 × 0.15 = 10.7
Weighted sum = 18.2 + 17.2 + 14.8 + 10.7
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #38266
+30 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

display.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why display.io ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat13.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other WordPress sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

73/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

19 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

38 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.display.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home – Display.io
  • ✓ og:description — Incremental advertising in mobile apps
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

43/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
display.io
34
Your ACRI Score
→
safely.co.jp
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words88
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Very little extractable text detected (88 words). AI crawlers may be blocked from accessing the real page content — check the Ghost Ratio and Bot Access sections.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

43
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability43/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (4.0 KB)Bloat (50.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 9 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.7% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 1013 / Noise: 12874 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache/2.4.48 (Unix) OpenSSL/1.1.1n
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time747 ms
Raw HTML Size54.2 KB
Visible Text Size4.0 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

747 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

298
DOM nodes
54 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
js.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

71/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.display.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

18
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 34/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for display.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/display.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=display.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 22 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
34
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
36
Avg across 22 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
13782
Avg Bloat
44.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.display.io/advertiser-terms-of-use/
Advertiser Terms of Use – Display.io
 legal 90 4.0× 3860 ✓
https://www.display.io/publisher-terms-and-conditions/
Publisher Terms and Conditions – Display.io
 legal 90 3.9× 3942 ✓
https://www.display.io/publishers-dpa/
Publisher Data Processing Agreement – Display.io
 pricing 85 7.2× 1718 💰 Pricing
https://www.display.io/advertiser-dpa/
Advertiser Data Processing Agreement | display.io
 other 85 5.4× 2541 ✓
https://display.io/products
Display.io | Incremental advertising in mobile applications.
 product 54 62.6× 362 ✓
https://www.display.io/case-study/how-smartnews-grew-ad-revenue-by-7-at-no-risk/
How SmartNews grew ad revenue by 7% at no risk – Display.io
 social-proof 54 76.8× 231 ✓
https://www.display.io/publishers/
Display.io | Publishers. Attract new in-app ad revenue.
 other 54 99.3× 279 ✓
https://www.display.io/advertisers/
Display.io | Advertisers. Direct and exclusive inventory.
 other 54 91.5× 242 ✓
https://www.display.io/inapp/
In-App – Display.io
 other 54 54.9× 306 ✓
https://www.display.io/case-study/
Display.io | Unlocking Success! Exploring Case Studies.
 social-proof 44 166.1× 74 ✓
https://www.display.io/index/
Display.io | Incremental advertising in mobile applications.
 other 44 160.0× 52 ✓
https://www.display.io/sonar/
Audio – Display.io
 other 44 74.4× 127 ✓
https://www.display.io/main/
Main – Display.io
 other 34 170.8× 48 ✓
https://display.io/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://display.io/about about 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://display.io/features product 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://display.io/docs docs 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://display.io/blog blog 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://display.io/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://display.io/contact support 0 0.0× 0 ✓
Showing 20 of 22 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-study/ 2 49 0% 121.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/advertiser-dpa/ 1 85 0% 5.4× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/publisher-terms-and-conditions/ 1 90 0% 3.9× Healthy
/advertiser-terms-of-use/ 1 90 0% 4.0× Healthy
/publishers-dpa/ 1 85 0% 7.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 54 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/sonar/ 1 44 0% 74.3× High JS Bloat
/inapp/ 1 54 0% 54.9× High JS Bloat
/advertisers/ 1 54 0% 91.5× High JS Bloat
/publishers/ 1 54 0% 99.3× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/display.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to display.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
display.io (this site) 34 70 WordPress 13.7× 1 —
tokic.hr 59 76 WordPress 12.9× 1 Compare →
videograph.ai 59 79 WordPress 15.3× 1 Compare →
surepaint.com.au 59 77 WordPress 13.4× 3 Compare →
cassiuslife.com 59 77 WordPress 13.3× 3 Compare →
leadinfo.eu 59 77 WordPress 9.8× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite display.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to display.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html 
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for display.io:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
75
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.