egress.com 83 A
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 100

egress.com — Global SEODiff Score 83/100

egress.com
📊

With a solid 79/100 ACRI, egress.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 91% of sites in the Radar. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 3.0× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The presence of 5 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

83
A — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Excellent overall visibility. Architecture (100) is your strongest pillar.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 29 snapshots
Feb 21 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than egress.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 34.8 + 14.8 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 83 (A)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 35
50
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #15911
+8 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

egress.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why egress.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage5 blocks
Token bloat3.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

83 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

121 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.egress.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Egress Intelligent Email Security: Anti-Phishing, Data Loss Prevention & Encryption
  • ✓ og:description — Intelligent Email Security protects against data breaches by engaging and empowering users without introducing friction.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 76 elements (76 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words679
Raw Density11.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks5 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

76
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability76/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

33%
🗑️ 67%
Useful Content (27.0 KB)Bloat (54.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 23 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

50 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 66.9% · SNR: 0.49 · Signal: 6911 / Noise: 13988 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of egress.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Egress provides cloud email security using adaptive security to mitigate human risk and outbound data breaches.
Target Audience
IT security professionals, cybersecurity analysts, data protection officers
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Adaptive security model and human risk assessment differentiate Egress from traditional email security solutions.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time709 ms
Raw HTML Size81.6 KB
Visible Text Size27.0 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

709 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

635
DOM nodes
82 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.egress.com/xmlsitemap
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

84
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 72/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for egress.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/egress.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=egress.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 127 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
72
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
75
Avg across 127 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
15%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
119925
Avg Bloat
19.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/artificial-intelligence-for-data-protection
Artificial Intelligence for Data Protection | Blog | Egress
blog 90 5.0× 3692
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/insider-threats-in-cyber-security
Insider threats in cyber security | Egress
pricing 90 7.4× 2316 💰 Pricing
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/lessons-from-hrs-mark-walmsley-matt-nears-tony-pepper
HRS lessons from Mark Walmsley, Matt Nears, and Tony Pepper
blog 90 9.7× 1967
https://www.egress.com/blog/phishing/what-is-spearphishing
What is spear phishing | Cybersecurity | Egress UK
pricing 90 8.5× 1952 💰 Pricing
https://www.egress.com/blog/phishing/top-ransomware-attacks-statistics
Ransomware: 2023's top attacks and need-to-know stats | Egress
pricing 90 9.0× 2298 💰 Pricing
https://www.egress.com/blog/phishing/seven-new-phishing-scams
Seven new (and convincing!) phishing scams to watch out for
blog 90 9.8× 1656
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/how-does-ddos-attack-work
How does a DDoS attack work?
blog 80 17.8× 792
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/australia-three-major-data-breaches
Australia rocked by three major data breaches | Egress
blog 80 15.3× 968
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/australia-respond-cybercrime-breaches
Responding to cybercrime and data breaches in Australia
blog 80 14.3× 1055
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/passwords-stay-security-nightmare
Are passwords here to stay? | Email security | Egress
blog 80 16.5× 967
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/hard-make-employees-update-software
Why's it so hard to make employees update their software? | Egress
blog 80 16.5× 908
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/cybersecurity-predictions-next-year
Four cybersecurity predictions for 2023 | Egress
blog 80 15.8× 929
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/cost-cybercrime-australia-skyrockets
The cost of cybercrime in Australia skyrockets | Egress
blog 80 17.9× 814
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/data-privacy-laws-australian-businesses
What do new data privacy laws mean for Australian businesses
pricing 80 17.1× 856 💰 Pricing
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/cybersecurity-predictions-this-year
Cybersecurity predictions for 2024
blog 80 11.9× 1433
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/lessons-from-hrs-nadine-michaelides-and-jinan-budge
Lessons from Nadine Michaelides and Jinan Budge
blog 80 15.3× 1299
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/biggest-data-breaches-in-history
Biggest data breaches in history
pricing 80 13.6× 1089 💰 Pricing
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/are-senior-executives-the-achilles-heel-of-cybersecurity
Are senior executives the Achilles' heel of cybersecurity? | Egress
blog 80 12.0× 1477
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/why-more-phishing-attacks-are-bypassing-outdated-perimeter-detection
Why more phishing attacks are bypassing perimeter detection | Egress
blog 80 13.9× 1237
https://www.egress.com/blog/security-and-email-security/what-do-cybercriminals-have-planned-for-2025
Expert predictions: What do cybercriminals have planned for 2025?
pricing 80 13.6× 1231 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 118 78 0% 18.9× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 75 0% 12.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 67 0% 27.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 57 0% 46.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 57 0% 56.2× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 46 0% 145.5× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 127 pages
knowbe4.com ×123
servicestatus.egress.com ×122
support.egress.com ×122
pages.egress.com ×122
reader.egress.com ×122
store.egress.com ×122
ibm.com ×7
reuters.com ×7
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/egress.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to egress.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
egress.com (this site) 72 79 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5
vet-concept.at 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 2 Compare →
romb.co.uk 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 2 Compare →
rexlondontrade.com 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 2 Compare →
ciawifi.ru 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 2 Compare →
anatel.gov.br 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite egress.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to egress.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Egress?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Egress does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Egress work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Egress."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for egress.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →