episodi.fi 67 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 74 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 76

episodi.fi — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

episodi.fi
📊

episodi.fi achieves a 68/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places episodi.fi above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 2.1× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than episodi.fi?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)74 × 0.40 = 29.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 29.6 + 9.4 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
23
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #82274
+30 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

episodi.fi punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why episodi.fi ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

49 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

138 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.episodi.fi/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Episodi.fi
  • ✓ og:description — Episodi on Suomen suurin elokuvalehti. Episodi kirjoittaa monipuolisesti elokuvamaailman tapahtumista ja ennen kaikkea uusista elokuvista.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

74/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
episodi.fi
55
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 23/100 — Low
Structured Elements 122 elements (122 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words7588
Raw Density1.6%
💡Low structure score (23/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 122 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

52
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability52/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

47%
🗑️ 53%
Useful Content (159.2 KB)Bloat (181.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context58% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage18 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

73 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 53.2% · SNR: 0.88 · Signal: 40759 / Noise: 46355 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of episodi.fi and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website is a film news and review site, providing information about movies and television shows, including release dates, cast information, and critical reception.
Target Audience
Film enthusiasts, moviegoers, television viewers, and general audiences interested in current and classic films.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive film news coverage and curated content aggregation.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Links to film release datesLists of Oscar nominees and winnersLinks to streaming services
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO optimization for individual film articles
• Lack of structured data for film information
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1592 ms
Raw HTML Size340.3 KB
Visible Text Size159.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1592 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

955
DOM nodes
340 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, s-maxage=3600
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.episodi.fi/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

176
internal links
15
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for episodi.fi
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/episodi.fi" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=episodi.fi" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 56 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
-10
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
45
Avg across 56 pages · Range 0–64
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
15902
Avg Bloat
132.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/elokuvavuosi-2009-%e2%80%93-paras-kasikirjoitus/
Elokuvavuosi 2009 – paras käsikirjoitus - Episodi.fi
other 64 103.3× 516
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/parhaat-elokuvat-2009-%e2%80%93-toimituksen-suosikit/
Parhaat elokuvat 2009 – toimituksen suosikit - Episodi.fi
other 64 106.4× 501
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/episodin-lukijoiden-suosikit-2009/
Episodin lukijoiden suosikit 2009 - Episodi.fi
pricing 64 71.9× 751 💰 Pricing
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/oscar-ehdokkuudet-julkistettu/
Oscar-ehdokkuudet julkistettu - Episodi.fi
other 64 101.1× 525
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/the-hurt-locker-kahmi-oscareita/
The Hurt Locker kahmi Oscareita - Episodi.fi
other 64 103.9× 521
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/kielletty-hedelma-palkittiin-jalleen-2/
Kielletty hedelmä palkittiin jälleen - Episodi.fi
other 54 172.5× 305
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/the-crow-palaa-valkokankaalle/
The Crow palaa valkokankaalle - Episodi.fi
other 54 178.9× 293
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/freddy-krueger-paras-kauhuhahmo/
Freddy Krueger paras kauhuhahmo - Episodi.fi
other 54 182.8× 287
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/potter-tahdesta-parhaiten-palkittu-naisnayttelija/
Potter-tähdestä parhaiten palkattu naisnäyttelijä - Episodi.fi
other 54 168.0× 313
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/paha-perhe-avasi-vaisusti/
Paha perhe avasi vaisusti - Episodi.fi
other 54 177.0× 296
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/mannerheim-elokuva-sai-saksalaisrahoittajan/
Mannerheim-elokuva sai saksalaisrahoittajan - Episodi.fi
other 54 181.1× 290
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/pappi-jaakob-voitti-parhaan-elokuvan-jussin/
Pappi Jaakob voitti parhaan elokuvan Jussin - Episodi.fi
other 54 139.9× 379
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/dokumentaristi-andrei-nekrasov-tampereelle/
Dokumentaristi Andrei Nekrasov Tampereelle - Episodi.fi
other 54 169.7× 310
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/harjunpaa-ja-pahan-pappi-tehdaan-elokuvaksi/
Harjunpää ja pahan pappi tehdään elokuvaksi - Episodi.fi
other 54 166.3× 316
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/
Uutiset - Episodi.fi
other 54 163.5× 360
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/malkovich-hamahakkimiehen-nelososaan/
Malkovich Hämähäkkimiehen nelososaan - Episodi.fi
other 54 208.3× 252
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/maguire-ja-raimi-hylkasivat-hamahakkimiehen/
Maguire ja Raimi hylkäsivät Hämähäkkimiehen - Episodi.fi
other 54 175.3× 300
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/elokuvavuosi-2009-%e2%80%93-paras-ohjaus/
Elokuvavuosi 2009 – paras ohjaus - Episodi.fi
other 54 110.9× 480
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/elokuvavuosi-2009-%e2%80%93-paras-naisnayttelija/
Elokuvavuosi 2009 – paras naisnäyttelijä - Episodi.fi
other 54 106.8× 499
https://www.episodi.fi/uutiset/elokuvavuosi-2009-%e2%80%93-paras-dvd-ensi-ilta/
Elokuvavuosi 2009 – paras dvd-ensi-ilta - Episodi.fi
other 54 135.0× 393
Showing 20 of 56 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/uutiset/ 46 55 0% 161.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 56 pages
popmedia.fi ×46
popmedia.ocast.com ×46
instagram.com ×46
leffatykki.com ×46
meteli.net ×46
rumba.fi ×46
voice.fi ×46
soundi.fi ×46
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/episodi.fi

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to episodi.fi. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
episodi.fi (this site) 55 68 WordPress 2.1× 1
home.edweb.net 80 88 WordPress 4.1× 1 Compare →
mrwallpaper.com 80 83 WordPress 3.0× 2 Compare →
roudou-pro.com 80 86 WordPress 2.2× 4 Compare →
corporatehousingbyowner.com 80 90 WordPress 7.3× 4 Compare →
oasap.com 80 91 WordPress 11.2× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite episodi.fi when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to episodi.fi. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Episodi",
  "url": "https://episodi.fi",
  "logo": "https://episodi.fi/favicon-96x96.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Episodi?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Episodi does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Episodi work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Episodi."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for episodi.fi:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →