epochtimes.com 71 B
🛡️ SEO 54 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 58 🏗️ Arch 90

epochtimes.com — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

epochtimes.com
📊

epochtimes.com achieves a 66/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places epochtimes.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.1×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Partial bot access means the domain is visible to some AI systems but not accessible to others — some key bots are restricted.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (54) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than epochtimes.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)54 × 0.25 = 13.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)58 × 0.20 = 11.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 13.5 + 32.8 + 11.6 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
56
Structure
avg 35
4
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #21266
+41 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 43%
Score 66/100

epochtimes.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why epochtimes.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat4.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

54/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

30 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

245 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.epochtimes.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 大紀元
  • ✓ og:description — 2000年在美國創立的大紀元,目前是全球最大的中文和多語種報紙與網路媒體。大紀元為讀者呈現最快最準確的信息;秉承普世價值,堅持獨立原則,揭露被中共掩蓋的真相,為受迫害者發聲。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
epochtimes.com
62
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 56/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 118 elements (118 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1240
Raw Density9.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

24%
🗑️ 76%
Useful Content (36.1 KB)Bloat (112.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context83% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage87 / 105 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

23 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.7% · SNR: 0.32 · Signal: 9246 / Noise: 28850 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of epochtimes.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
大紀元新聞網提供全球中文和多語種新聞,揭露中共真相。
Target Audience
Chinese and multilingual news readers, politically aware individuals.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Independent journalism and focus on exposing Chinese government actions.
📊 Content Depth
2/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time545 ms
Raw HTML Size148.8 KB
Visible Text Size36.1 KB

Performance & Speed

58/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

545 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2096
DOM nodes
149 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=120
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.epochtimes.com/sitemap/zh-tw/sitemap.xml.gz
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

622
internal links
57
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for epochtimes.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/epochtimes.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=epochtimes.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 122 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
-11
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
52
Avg across 122 pages · Range 0–60
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 62, but internal pages average only 52 — a -11-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
34119
Avg Bloat
95.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/21/8/31/n13200714.htm
高智晟先生步入社會時經歷的人心冷暖(下) | 艱困磨練 | 生死一線 | 八十年代 | 大紀元
other 60 98.2× 239
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/21/8/31/n13200712.htm
高智晟先生步入社會時經歷的人心冷暖(上) | 艱困磨練 生死一線 | 八十年代 | 高智晟家書《爸爸的故事》 | 大紀元
other 60 104.0× 225
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41780.htm
雷戈:民主与選舉 | 鏍翋 | 大紀元
other 60 53.7× 274
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41781.htm
澳洲一男子疑自身艾滋病傳給家人 無情殺害妻子女儿 | 鬲訞瓷 | 大紀元
other 60 46.9× 287
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41777.htm
佣金流向朝跨國洗錢方向追查 | 大紀元
other 60 53.3× 233
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41721.htm
加入世貿后的中國媒体變化 | 大紀元
other 60 52.7× 242
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41759.htm
巴勒斯坦人要求尋根以色列拒絕接受 | 匙眕睿抶 | 大紀元
other 60 56.9× 216
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41756.htm
回鄉途中被丟下 少女深夜獲救助 | 大紀元
other 60 54.8× 228
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41746.htm
金培力:扭曲天安門故弄玄虛 | 大紀元
other 60 51.8× 263
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41743.htm
余杰:一流學者的掙扎与超越 | 眭妎煦赽 | 大紀元
other 60 56.5× 224
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41737.htm
毒米毒油吃不消! | 大紀元
other 60 60.4× 215
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41733.htm
馬可斯遺產案中的被告無罪釋放 | 大紀元
other 60 59.3× 207
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41740.htm
日本細菌仍在繼續危害中國人 | 大紀元
other 60 61.9× 205
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41730.htm
高行健:文學跟政府沒有關系 | 大紀元
other 60 53.2× 242
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41729.htm
天安門自焚与六四大屠殺:似曾相識 | 大紀元
other 60 59.6× 203
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41713.htm
黎安友:序《天安門文件》 | 大紀元
other 60 58.6× 251
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41710.htm
林培瑞:專制語言的游戲 | 大紀元
other 60 53.9× 250
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41716.htm
高行健:香港處境微妙 | 詢俴翩 | 大紀元
other 60 51.5× 248
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41706.htm
沙龍“以色列之王”還是“貝魯特屠夫”? | 大紀元
other 60 59.3× 217
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/1/31/n41708.htm
王浩:冊封內幕 | 大紀元
other 60 55.2× 271
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/b5/ 112 56 0% 104.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 122 pages
tougao.epochtimes.com ×112
facebook.com ×112
twitter.com ×112
hk.epochtimes.com ×110
line.me ×110
donate.epochtimes.com ×45
epaper.epochtimes.com ×45
sf.epochtimes.com ×43
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/epochtimes.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to epochtimes.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
epochtimes.com (this site) 62 66 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 2
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite epochtimes.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to epochtimes.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Epochtimes",
  "url": "https://epochtimes.com",
  "logo": "https://epochtimes.com/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Epochtimes?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Epochtimes does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Epochtimes work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Epochtimes."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for epochtimes.com:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →