epower.cn 50 D
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 57 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 53

epower.cn — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

epower.cn
📊

At 70/100, the ACRI for epower.cn indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places epower.cn above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 13.7× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (41) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than epower.cn?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)57 × 0.40 = 22.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)53 × 0.15 = 7.9
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 22.8 + 9.4 + 7.9
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
52
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #21317
+31 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

epower.cn punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why epower.cn ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat13.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

153 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → //epower.cn/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — ePower企服引擎 - 企业服务引擎系统
  • ✓ og:description — ePower企服引擎是第一商务推出的企业服务引擎系统,集成商标、域名、云服务、官网建站等全方位互联网业务服务。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

57/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
epower.cn
39
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 52/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 14 elements (5 lists, 9 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words170
Raw Density8.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

47
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability47/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (22.2 KB)Bloat (280.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 54 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.7% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 5671 / Noise: 71863 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1609 ms
Raw HTML Size302.9 KB
Visible Text Size22.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1609 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1356
DOM nodes
303 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

53/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

70
internal links
23
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 39/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for epower.cn
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/epower.cn" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=epower.cn" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 119 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
39
Single-page score
-3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
36
Avg across 119 pages · Range 0–56
Total Words
24600
Avg Bloat
191.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://epower.cn/article/5681738832697760
预算1万还是5万,您的企服公司都能开张:ePower四大版本精准选择指南
blog 56 112.2× 505
https://epower.cn/article/5690856418016403
ePower诚邀合作伙伴:共逐“全国新十佳企业服务机构”权威荣誉,5W2H赋能高效申报
blog 46 175.9× 295
https://epower.cn/article/5695846879149413
ePower助力漫汇云:知识产权服务三端同步实践
blog 46 263.4× 247
https://epower.cn/article/5679298813590556
从0到1,ePower助力轻松入局商标知产数字化服务
blog 46 158.8× 325
https://epower.cn/article/5676102737667245
浙江七大商标代理领军企业,纷纷依托ePower系统抢占市场先机!
blog 46 198.2× 290
https://epower.cn/article/5689097740406099
数据完全私有:ePower如何保障企服平台的数据安全
blog 46 226.8× 251
https://epower.cn/article/5688804265070640
报名啦|2026(第五届)爱名奖 “全国新十佳企业服务机构”征集通道已开启
blog 46 198.1× 256
https://epower.cn/article/5686322910129072
企服创业的十字路口:加盟、SaaS、自主开发还是ePower?
blog 46 323.1× 219
https://epower.cn/article/5685987036395383
企服创业第一步:如何快速拥有自己的业务平台?
blog 46 327.4× 259
https://epower.cn/article/5679645337891155
ePower第2515期升级:图片附件可拖拽上传
blog 46 220.5× 231
https://epower.cn/article/5677502219564486
业务升级:ePower实现商标服务全链路数字化智能链接商标局
blog 46 145.6× 379
https://epower.cn/article/5673593613786278
2025浙超颁奖盛典完美落幕,22科技集团杜灵芝受邀出席_爱名网22.CN
blog 46 453.1× 206
https://epower.cn/article/5671816696948734
国知局:加强商标使用管理,重点关注7种违法违规行为
blog 46 179.7× 247
https://epower.cn/article/5407452865918252
知识产权源码系统-助力企服企业数字化升级!
blog 46 183.4× 227
https://epower.cn/article/5630427017969482
沃名网:当拥有ePower支持后,发现一切都变的简单了!
blog 46 157.6× 281
https://epower.cn/article/5629724390516147
传统企业互联网转型难?看同行怎么借企服破局
blog 46 157.9× 275
https://epower.cn/article/5629731829680437
专访五四商务:ePower就是我们一直寻找的专属企业服务的在线系统
blog 46 183.7× 239
https://epower.cn/article/5630367049275753
以 ePower 为桥,连接创业梦想与万亿企业服务市场
blog 46 177.7× 285
https://epower.cn/article/5361836775022795
一串数字|用ePower系统轻松管理天猫渠道知产服务订单!
blog 46 180.4× 257
https://epower.cn/article/5691283217781501
持续更新保障:ePower如何确保系统长期稳定运行
blog 43 218.4× 227
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/article/ 109 39 1% 204.6× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 33 1% 409.0× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 26 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/epower.cn

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to epower.cn. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
epower.cn (this site) 39 70 Custom / Proprietary 13.7× 0
unode50.ru 64 76 Custom / Proprietary 13.6× 0 Compare →
jiancai.huangye88.com 64 75 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 0 Compare →
skisprungschanzen.com 64 74 Custom / Proprietary 5.2× 0 Compare →
premium.pl 64 78 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0 Compare →
antiwar.com 64 74 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite epower.cn when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to epower.cn. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Epower",
  "url": "https://epower.cn",
  "logo": "https://uploadfile.ltdcdn.com/uploadfile/image/0/1/49/2019-09/15689788011649.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Epower",
  "url": "https://epower.cn",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://epower.cn/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for epower.cn:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →