example.com 50 D
🛡️ SEO 32 🤖 GEO 48 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 46

example.com — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

example.com
📋 Executive Audit

Example Domain operates in the SaaS category with a Global SEODiff Score of 50, placing it below average in search visibility intelligence, particularly when compared to the benchmark. Its ACRI Score of 28 and F-grade reflect significant shortcomings in content quality, semantic coherence, and overall search relevance. Despite strong technical performance—evidenced by a TTFB of 578ms, minimal HTML payload (0.5KB), and excellent extractability (85)—the site suffers from critical content and structural deficiencies that undermine its discoverability and AI-readiness.

The site demonstrates solid technical foundations: it is hosted on Cloudflare Pages with low token bloat (3.7x), minimal ghost ratio (5.0%), and open access for major AI crawlers including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and CCBot. However, these strengths are offset by severe content issues—only 21 words of useful text, a word count of just 21, and a semantic structure score of 20, indicating minimal meaningful content or topic clustering. The absence of any structured data (zero schema blocks), no breadcrumbs, no sitemap declaration, and zero internal links suggest a fragmented architecture. With only one external link and no organization or product schema, the site offers little to no signal to search engines or AI systems about its purpose or value.

From an architectural perspective, the site exhibits a high degree of isolation: no internal linking, no sitemap, and no clear entity hierarchy. This results in poor crawl efficiency and weak link equity distribution. The low retrieval robustness (10) and content integrity (16) further confirm that search systems struggle to extract meaningful information. To improve, the site must prioritize content expansion, implement schema markup, rebuild internal linking, and declare a sitemap. These steps would significantly elevate its ACRI grade and AI-readiness, unlocking potential for higher rankings and better AI indexing.

✦ Executive Audit synthesized by SEODiff AI · Mar 5, 2026
50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (32) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 3 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than example.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)32 × 0.25 = 8.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)48 × 0.40 = 19.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)46 × 0.15 = 6.9
Weighted sum = 8.0 + 19.2 + 16.0 + 6.9
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #177
+49 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 49%
Score 62/100

example.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why example.com ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
Industrysaas
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat3.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

32/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

14 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

48/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, smahospital.jp (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
example.com
28
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. smahospital.jp has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses Next.js. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words21
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Very little extractable text detected (21 words). AI crawlers may be blocked from accessing the real page content — check the Ghost Ratio and Bot Access sections.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (142 B)Bloat (386 B)
Token Bloat Ratio3.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

32 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.5% · SNR: 0.36 · Signal: 35 / Noise: 97 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time514 ms
Raw HTML Size528 B
Visible Text Size142 B

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

514 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

11
DOM nodes
0 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

46/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
1
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 28/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for example.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/example.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=example.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 23 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
28
Single-page score
-28
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
0
Avg across 23 pages · Range 0–0
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 28, but internal pages average only 0 — a -28-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
0
Avg Bloat
0.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://example.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/api docs 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/guides blog 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/resources blog 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/help support 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/solutions product 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/demo conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/get-started conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/support support 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/security trust 0 0.0× 0
https://example.com/trust trust 0 0.0× 0
Showing 20 of 23 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/privacy/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/demo/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/terms/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/resources/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/api/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/trust/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/get-started/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/example.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to example.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
example.com (this site) 28 62 Cloudflare Pages 3.7× 0
visionsimpleblog.uk 53 15 Cloudflare Pages 3.7× 0 Compare →
thothub.is 53 71 Cloudflare Pages 4.1× 0 Compare →
zonevipnow.com 53 15 Cloudflare Pages 3.0× 0 Compare →
filmizle.cam 53 76 Cloudflare Pages 5.0× 0 Compare →
dojki.tv 53 71 Cloudflare Pages 1.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite example.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to example.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Example",
  "url": "https://example.com",
  "logo": "https://example.com/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Example",
  "url": "https://example.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://example.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for example.com:

Current Score
62
Projected Score
72
Improvement
+10 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

7.1
AI-Trust
#601
Global Rank
66%
Percentile
26
Inbound AI Links
1
Outbound AI Links
44
Avg Inbound ACRI
27%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
euronext.com 76 0.0 ← cites you
oslobors.no 66 0.0 ← cites you
visitindy.com 65 0.0 ← cites you
inumet.gub.uy 61 0.0 ← cites you
idnes.cz 58 0.0 ← cites you
lidovky.cz 56 0.0 ← cites you
bitadvent.com 55 0.0 ← cites you
kwipped.com 53 0.0 ← cites you
pntsystems.my 52 0.0 ← cites you
metro.cz 51 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →