expreso.ec 72 B
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 83

expreso.ec — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

expreso.ec
📊

expreso.ec shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places expreso.ec above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 15% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. A 6.7× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 4 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than expreso.ec?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 33.2 + 9.4 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
48
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #54402
+14 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

expreso.ec shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why expreso.ec ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat6.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

37 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

144 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 80
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.expreso.ec/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → es
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Noticias Ecuador mundo | Expreso
  • ✓ og:description — Noticias, información y actualidad de Ecuador y Latinoamérica: nacional, guayaquil, economía, deportes, mundo, opinión, nuevo vivir, ciencia y tecnología
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
expreso.ec
63
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 48/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 152 elements (152 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2236
Raw Density6.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (78.3 KB)Bloat (447.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context99% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage127 / 128 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.1% · SNR: 0.18 · Signal: 20054 / Noise: 114545 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of expreso.ec and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website provides a sports agenda for DirecTV, offering users access to scheduled sports events.
Target Audience
Sports fans, DirecTV subscribers
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
None
📊 Content Depth
1/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages
• Lack of structured data
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time853 ms
Raw HTML Size525.8 KB
Visible Text Size78.3 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

853 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2698
DOM nodes
526 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=30, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googlesyndication.comtaboola.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.expreso.ec/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

218
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → es
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 63/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for expreso.ec
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/expreso.ec" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=expreso.ec" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 74 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
63
Single-page score
-20
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
43
Avg across 74 pages · Range 0–64
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 63, but internal pages average only 43 — a -20-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
18196
Avg Bloat
374.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.expreso.ec/deportes/agenda-deportiva
Agenda deportiva DirecTV | Deportes
other 64 44.2× 522
https://www.expreso.ec/tag/plan
Noticias Ecuador y el Mundo | Expreso
pricing 54 69.2× 290 💰 Pricing
https://www.expreso.ec/deportes/ligapro
LigaPro | Deportes
other 54 62.2× 332
https://www.expreso.ec/opinion/editoriales
Expreso - Editorial
other 54 69.0× 275
https://www.expreso.ec/buenavida/trabajo
Expreso - Trabajo
pricing 54 60.4× 347 💰 Pricing
https://www.expreso.ec/quito
Quito
other 54 52.8× 408
https://www.expreso.ec/buenavida/buenavida-moda
Expreso - Moda
pricing 54 57.5× 364 💰 Pricing
https://www.expreso.ec/provincias
Provincias
other 54 57.7× 363
https://www.expreso.ec/buenavida
Expreso - Buena Vida
other 54 46.3× 466
https://www.expreso.ec/cuenca
Cuenca
other 54 59.5× 349
https://www.expreso.ec/entretenimiento
Entretenimiento
other 54 62.0× 332
https://www.expreso.ec/economia-y-negocios
Economía y negocios
other 54 95.5× 206
https://www.expreso.ec/ecuador
Ecuador
other 54 55.6× 378
https://www.expreso.ec/justicia
Justicia
other 54 57.0× 368
https://www.expreso.ec/politica
Política
pricing 54 56.4× 371 💰 Pricing
https://www.expreso.ec/servicios
Servicios
other 54 59.3× 354
https://www.expreso.ec/video
Video
other 54 93.1× 228
https://www.expreso.ec/premium
Premium
other 54 58.0× 360
https://www.expreso.ec/buenavida-gastronomia
Gastronomía
other 54 61.7× 340
https://www.expreso.ec/podcast
Pódcast
other 54 64.0× 326
Showing 20 of 74 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/ocio/ 10 54 0% 56.5× High JS Bloat
/buenavida/ 8 54 0% 58.1× High JS Bloat
/opinion/ 6 51 0% 102.7× High JS Bloat
/actualidad/ 4 54 0% 57.0× High JS Bloat
/deportes/ 3 57 0% 51.3× High JS Bloat
/guayaquil/ 2 54 0% 52.1× High JS Bloat
/tag/ 2 44 0% 225.8× High JS Bloat
/temas-del-dia/ 1 34 0% 407.3× High JS Bloat
/economia-y-negocios/ 1 54 0% 95.5× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/quito/ 1 54 0% 52.8× High JS Bloat
/ecuador/ 1 54 0% 55.6× High JS Bloat
/justicia/ 1 54 0% 57.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 74 pages
services.expreso.ec ×64
api.whatsapp.com ×64
instagram.com ×64
services.extra.ec ×64
play.google.com ×64
youtube.com ×64
whatsapp.com ×64
tiktok.com ×64
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/expreso.ec

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to expreso.ec. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
expreso.ec (this site) 63 75 Custom / Proprietary 6.7× 3
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite expreso.ec when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to expreso.ec. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Expreso",
  "url": "https://expreso.ec",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://expreso.ec/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Expreso?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Expreso does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Expreso work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Expreso."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for expreso.ec:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →