eye-able.com 68 C
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 33 🏗️ Arch 86

eye-able.com — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

eye-able.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for eye-able.com is strong: an ACRI of 78/100 places it ahead of 88% of domains in the index. In the government sector, eye-able.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Heavy markup overhead (17.2× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Rich structured data (4 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (33) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than eye-able.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)33 × 0.20 = 6.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)86 × 0.15 = 12.9
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 30.4 + 6.6 + 12.9
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
57
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #37893
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

eye-able.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why eye-able.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrygovernment
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat17.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

41 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

127 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 41
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://eye-able.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-gb
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Eye-Able | Digital Accessibility Platform
  • ✓ og:description — Improve the digital accessibility of your website with Eye-Able ✓ Works on any website ▷ Promote inclusion now!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, gep.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
eye-able.com
65
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gep.com has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Drupal. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 57/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 258 elements (258 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2631
Raw Density9.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (24.9 KB)Bloat (402.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio17.2× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context59% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage114 / 192 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 94.2% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 6371 / Noise: 103088 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of eye-able.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Eye-Able helps B2B companies ensure their digital solutions are legally compliant and user-friendly by providing a platform for accessibility audits,
Target Audience
B2B companies, IT professionals, legal teams, procurement managers, and digital product managers.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based platform with tiered pricing based on features and usage – details available upon request.
🔗 Integration Partners
WCAG
🛡️ Compliance Standards
WCAG 2.1WCAG 2.2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered accessibility testing and automated accessibility statement generation, simplifying compliance for B2B companies.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
WCAG 2.1WCAG 2.2
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complex legal requirements of the EAA
• Lack of internal expertise in accessibility
• Time-consuming manual accessibility audits
• Difficulty in creating compliant accessibility statements
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1126 ms
Raw HTML Size427.6 KB
Visible Text Size24.9 KB

Performance & Speed

33/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1126 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3433
DOM nodes
428 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

86/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://eye-able.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

171
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-gb
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for eye-able.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/eye-able.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=eye-able.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 92 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
-24
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
42
Avg across 92 pages · Range 0–59
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 65, but internal pages average only 42 — a -24-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
66598
Avg Bloat
458.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
80
⚠️
80 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 80 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/agid-live-platform-to-check-accessibility
AGID: Live platform to check accessibility | Eye-Able
pricing 59 88.3× 492 💰 Pricing
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/eaa-b2b
EAA in B2B: Does the European Accessibility Act apply to your business? | Eye-Able
pricing 57 188.3× 1205 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/pricing
Eye-Able
pricing 49 778.5× 51
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-as-business-booster
Accessibility as Business-Booster | Eye-Able
pricing 49 373.4× 586 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-on-the-internet-duty-or-matter-of-the-heart
Accessibility on the Internet: Duty or matter of the heart? | Eye-Able
pricing 49 390.5× 558 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-laws-worldwide
Accessibility laws worldwide | Eye-Able
pricing 49 128.2× 1764 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-statement
Accessibility statement explained in simple terms: content, obligations, examples | Eye-Able
pricing 49 97.0× 2401 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-on-instagram-tiktok-and-co
Social media all social: accessibility on Instagram, TikTok and co. | Eye-Able
pricing 49 254.8× 865 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-test
How can I test my website’s accessibility? | Eye-Able
pricing 49 162.1× 1383 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessibility-statement-2025
Accessibility Statement and what changes from 2025 | Eye-Able
pricing 49 255.8× 863 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessible-design
Accessible design with WCAG: How it’s done | Eye-Able
pricing 49 140.8× 1654 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/accessible-web-design-eye-able-twt-a-powerful-team-for-digital-inclusion
Accessible Web Design: Eye-Able® & TWT - A powerful team for digital inclusion
pricing 49 362.3× 603 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/ai-accessibility-how-organizations-create-inclusive-digital-experiences
Alt text and digital accessibility: how it works | Eye-Able
pricing 49 143.9× 1642 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/alt-text-for-barrier-free-reading-of-images
Alt text and digital accessibility: how it works | Eye-Able
pricing 49 143.7× 1643 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/artificial-intelligence-in-digital-accessibility-and-how-we-already-use-it
Artificial intelligence in digital accessibility - and how we already use it | Eye-Able
pricing 49 225.7× 974 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/aria-label
aria-label in HTML: The secret to accessible buttons & forms | Eye-Able
pricing 49 122.8× 1929 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/back-to-university-eye-able-and-the-way-to-a-more-inclusive-education-landscape
Back to University: Eye-Able® and the way to a more inclusive education landscape
pricing 49 401.5× 542 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/bfsg-2025-thats-matters
The EAA 2025: That's what matters! | Eye-Able
pricing 49 161.3× 1403 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/beyond-stereotypes-representation-of-disabilities-in-the-media
Beyond stereotypes? Representation of disabilities in the media | Eye-Able
pricing 49 305.7× 717 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://eye-able.com/da/blog/bfsg-warnings-accessibility
BFSG warnings: What you need to consider now regarding accessibility | Eye-Able
pricing 49 327.8× 670 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 92 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/da/ 82 46 1% 454.4× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 49 0% 778.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 29 1% 4104.9× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 92 pages
facebook.com ×84
youtube.com ×84
instagram.com ×84
linkedin.com ×84
calendly.com ×74
meetings-eu1.hubspot.com ×9
help.eye-able.com ×3
dashboard.eye-able.com ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/eye-able.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to eye-able.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
eye-able.com (this site) 65 78 Custom / Proprietary 17.2× 4
cbh.com 79 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 3 Compare →
jcb.com 78 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 1 Compare →
enva.com 80 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 2 Compare →
allinternationalconference.com 78 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 0 Compare →
tullylegal.com 79 91 WordPress 14.8× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite eye-able.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to eye-able.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Eye-able?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Eye-able does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Eye-able work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Eye-able."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for eye-able.com:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →