fancourier.ro 71 B
🛡️ SEO 71 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 56 🏗️ Arch 63

fancourier.ro — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

fancourier.ro
📊

With a solid 79/100 ACRI, fancourier.ro is well-positioned for AI search — better than 91% of sites in the Radar. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 7.9× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (56) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than fancourier.ro?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)71 × 0.25 = 17.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)56 × 0.20 = 11.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)63 × 0.15 = 9.4
Weighted sum = 17.8 + 32.4 + 11.2 + 9.4
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
46
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #64663
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

fancourier.ro has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why fancourier.ro ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

71/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

20 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

253 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.fancourier.ro/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ro-RO
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Acasă - FAN Courier
  • ✓ og:description — Suntem liderul serviciilor de curierat din România înca din anul 2006 și ne dorim să rămânem în continuare partenerul de încredere al tuturor celor care aleg serviciile noastre, cu aceeași pasiune și dăruire pentru fiecare livrare efectuată.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 46/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 58 elements (58 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words910
Raw Density6.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

62
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability62/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

12%
🗑️ 88%
Useful Content (20.3 KB)Bloat (140.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context2% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 45 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 2% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 87.4% · SNR: 0.14 · Signal: 5193 / Noise: 35975 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of fancourier.ro and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
FAN Courier provides a comprehensive logistics and courier service, including express delivery, warehousing, and international shipping solutions, with a focus
Target Audience
Small businesses, e-commerce retailers, online shoppers, and individuals seeking convenient parcel delivery and logistics solutions.
Pricing Model
Variable, based on service type and volume. Offers various options including standard delivery, express delivery, and specialized services like FANbox.
🔗 Integration Partners
FANbox
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive network of locations, automated FANbox system, and a focus on sustainability and environmentally friendly logistics.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
selfAWB
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of detailed information on specific pricing structures
• Limited information on specific service features beyond general descriptions
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1072 ms
Raw HTML Size160.8 KB
Visible Text Size20.3 KB

Performance & Speed

56/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1072 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

782
DOM nodes
161 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3600, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

63/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

64
internal links
16
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ro-RO
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for fancourier.ro
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/fancourier.ro" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=fancourier.ro" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 21 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
14112
Avg Bloat
48.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://fancourier.ro/api
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
docs 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/pricing
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
pricing 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/guides
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
blog 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/about
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
about 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/help
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
support 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/resources
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
blog 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/solutions
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
product 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/products
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
product 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/features
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
product 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/docs
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
docs 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/blog
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
blog 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/case-studies
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
social-proof 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/get-started
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
conversion 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/demo
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
conversion 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/support
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
support 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/contact
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
support 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/integrations
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
integrations 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/faq
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
support 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/security
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
trust 64 48.7× 672
https://fancourier.ro/trust
Acasă - FAN CourierAcasă - FAN Courier
trust 64 48.7× 672
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/support/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/trust/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/guides/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/demo/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 64 0% 48.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
ec.europa.eu ×21
instagram.com ×21
play.google.com ×21
youtube.com ×21
dataprotection.ro ×21
twitter.com ×21
apps.apple.com ×21
facebook.com ×21
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/fancourier.ro

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to fancourier.ro. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
fancourier.ro (this site) 60 79 WordPress 7.9× 1
shop.hollandcomputers.com 70 81 WordPress 8.7× 1 Compare →
shakira-waka-waka.musicc.ir 70 82 WordPress 6.6× 1 Compare →
europesays.com 70 84 WordPress 8.0× 0 Compare →
sacrocuore.it 70 83 WordPress 5.5× 1 Compare →
mondoaffariweb.it 70 79 WordPress 4.2× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite fancourier.ro when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to fancourier.ro. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Fancourier?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Fancourier does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Fancourier work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Fancourier."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for fancourier.ro:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →