fany.lol 60 C
🛡️ SEO 43 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 40 🏗️ Arch 65

fany.lol — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

fany.lol
📊

fany.lol shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, fany.lol outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -1 (54→53)
📈 Mar 13 ACRI +1 (53→54)
Does your site score higher than fany.lol?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)43 × 0.25 = 10.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)40 × 0.20 = 8.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)65 × 0.15 = 9.8
Weighted sum = 10.8 + 31.2 + 8.0 + 9.8
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
59
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #73291
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

fany.lol shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why fany.lol ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

43/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

49 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

385 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — おもしろいを、もっと一緒に。 | FANY
  • ✓ og:description — FANYは、「おもしろい」が開花していくプラットフォームです。ライブ、ラジオ、マンガ、ドラマなど、表現の手段は自由自在。まだ見ぬ新しい才能やそれを応援するファンがジャンルの垣根を超えて掛け合わさりパワーアップしていく場を、エンタメを届ける私たちがサポートします。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
fany.lol
53
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 59/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 41 elements (41 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words393
Raw Density10.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (35.6 KB)Bloat (66.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context35% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 26 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 35% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.0% · SNR: 0.54 · Signal: 9105 / Noise: 16940 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of fany.lol and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
FANY provides a comprehensive platform for entertainment content distribution and sales, including DVDs, CDs, merchandise, and digital tickets, catering to
Target Audience
Fans, corporate clients, entertainment industry professionals, and general consumers seeking entertainment content and related services.
Pricing Model
Multiple tiers based on service usage and features, with a focus on revenue sharing and commission-based models for content providers.
🔗 Integration Partners
AmazonYouTube
🏆 Competitive Moat
Integrated ecosystem combining content distribution, ticketing, fan community management, and cloud funding, offering a one-stop solution for entertainment businesses.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Multiple forms of contact information (email, phone, chat)Detailed service descriptions and FAQ sectionsLinks to specific content categories (e.g., DVDs/CDs, merchandise, cloud funding)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complex user interface with multiple sections and navigation challenges
• Reliance on third-party platforms (Amazon) for certain aspects of the business
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time5127 ms
Raw HTML Size101.7 KB
Visible Text Size35.6 KB

Performance & Speed

40/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

5127 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

938
DOM nodes
102 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

65/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

33
internal links
16
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for fany.lol
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/fany.lol" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=fany.lol" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
-51
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
2
Avg across 21 pages · Range 0–52
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 53, but internal pages average only 2 — a -51-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
216
Avg Bloat
3.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://fany.lol/contact
お問い合わせ | FANY
support 52 79.8× 216
https://fany.lol/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/api docs 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/guides blog 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/help support 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/resources blog 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/solutions product 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/demo conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/get-started conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/support support 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/trust trust 0 0.0× 0
https://fany.lol/security trust 0 0.0× 0
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/careers/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/api/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 52 0% 79.8× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/support/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/security/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
instagram.com ×1
id.yoshimoto.co.jp ×1
play.google.com ×1
cf.fany.lol ×1
x.fany.lol ×1
fanyform.yoshimoto.co.jp ×1
mall-fany.rightsupport.help ×1
job.axol.jp ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/fany.lol

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to fany.lol. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
fany.lol (this site) 53 75 WordPress 2.9× 0
porno.surf 78 84 WordPress 2.1× 0 Compare →
freshlabels.cz 78 89 WordPress 2.9× 1 Compare →
irun.pe 78 88 WordPress 2.5× 1 Compare →
wagashi-biz.jp 78 84 WordPress 2.4× 1 Compare →
as-web.jp 78 90 WordPress 5.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite fany.lol when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to fany.lol. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Fany",
  "url": "https://fany.lol",
  "logo": "https://fany.lol/favicon.ico?1731660024",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Fany",
  "url": "https://fany.lol",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://fany.lol/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Fany?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Fany does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Fany work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Fany."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for fany.lol:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →