filestash.app 70 B
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 72

filestash.app — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

filestash.app
📊

filestash.app scores 64/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, placing it in the middle tier of indexed domains — there is clear room for improvement. In the developer sector, filestash.app outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Token bloat registers at 5.7× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than filestash.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)72 × 0.15 = 10.8
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 30.0 + 14.8 + 10.8
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
20
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 10%
Rank #98097
+38 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

filestash.app punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why filestash.app ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

46 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

93 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.filestash.app/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Filestash
  • ✓ og:description — The official website for Filestash (formerly Nuage), the self-hosted web client for your data
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
filestash.app
46
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 20/100 — Low
Structured Elements 12 elements (12 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words986
Raw Density1.2%
💡Low structure score (20/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 12 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

17%
🗑️ 83%
Useful Content (10.7 KB)Bloat (50.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context34% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage13 / 38 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 34% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 82.6% · SNR: 0.21 · Signal: 2737 / Noise: 12962 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of filestash.app and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Filestash is a SaaS platform that enables developers to extend and customize the Filestash file sharing solution through plugins, offering
Target Audience
Plugin developers, system administrators, IT professionals, DevOps engineers, and organizations seeking to integrate Filestash with existing systems.
Pricing Model
Unknown
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubS3LetsEncrypt
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensible plugin architecture with a wide range of interfaces and a community-driven ecosystem, enabling deep customization and integration capabilities.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Plugin documentation pageTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-05

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx/1.22.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time721 ms
Raw HTML Size61.3 KB
Visible Text Size10.7 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

721 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

360
DOM nodes
61 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

72/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.filestash.app/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

46
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 46/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for filestash.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/filestash.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=filestash.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 43 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
46
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 43 pages · Range 0–82
Topical Cohesion
8%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
20711
Avg Bloat
51.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.filestash.app/docs/guide/plugin-development.html
Filestash plugin development
pricing 82 4.8× 2807 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/docs/install-and-upgrade/
Install and Upgrade
pricing 77 7.2× 1451 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/docs/plugin/
Plugins
pricing 77 7.0× 2589 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.filestash.app/2019/05/06/benchmark/
Benchmarking results
pricing 77 7.4× 1172 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/ha/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Mafi kyawun S3 Client da Explorer kayan aiki don AWS S3
pricing 72 19.9× 684 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/bg/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Най-добрият S3 Client и Explorer инструмент за AWS S3
pricing 70 22.4× 647 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/bn/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | AWS S3 এর জন্য সেরা S3 Client এবং Explorer টুল
pricing 70 23.9× 630 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/el/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Το καλύτερο εργαλείο S3 Client και Explorer για το AWS S3
pricing 70 21.8× 679 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/docs/guide/virtual-filesystem.html
Deploying a Virtual File System
pricing 67 11.9× 669 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/fr/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Le meilleur client S3 en ligne
pricing 67 22.3× 653 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/es/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | La herramienta definitiva de cliente y explorador S3 para AWS S3
pricing 67 21.4× 676 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/ar/s3-browser.html
متصفح S3 | أفضل عميل ومستكشف S3 لـ AWS S3
pricing 67 27.1× 544 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/cs/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Nejlepší S3 Client a Explorer nástroj pro AWS S3
pricing 67 24.1× 575 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/da/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Det ultimative S3 Client og Explorer værktøj til AWS S3
pricing 67 21.7× 633 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/de/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Das ultimative S3 Client und Explorer Tool für AWS S3
pricing 67 23.6× 612 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/et/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Parim S3 Client ja Explorer tööriist AWS S3 jaoks
pricing 67 26.4× 521 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/fa/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | بهترین ابزار S3 Client و Explorer برای AWS S3
pricing 67 23.2× 640 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/docs/faq/
Faq
pricing 64 14.6× 539 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/fi/s3-browser.html
S3 Browser | Paras S3 Client ja Explorer työkalu AWS S3:lle
pricing 57 30.4× 452 💰 Pricing
https://www.filestash.app/docs/api/
API & Gateways
pricing 54 19.7× 455 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 43 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 14 54 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/2019/ 3 46 0% 67.6× High JS Bloat
/2018/ 2 41 0% 37.4× High JS Bloat
/features/ 2 49 0% 25.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/cs/ 1 67 0% 24.1× High JS Bloat
/ar/ 1 67 0% 27.1× High JS Bloat
/fa/ 1 67 0% 23.2× High JS Bloat
/fr/ 1 67 0% 22.3× High JS Bloat
/es/ 1 67 0% 21.4× High JS Bloat
/el/ 1 70 0% 21.8× High JS Bloat
/bg/ 1 70 0% 22.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/tags/ 1 46 0% 26.9× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 43 pages
support.filestash.app ×36
github.com ×36
platform.filestash.app ×36
demo.filestash.app ×21
aws.amazon.com ×16
en.wikipedia.org ×14
linkedin.com ×14
telegram.me ×13
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/filestash.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to filestash.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
filestash.app (this site) 46 64 Custom / Proprietary 5.7× 1
codezine.jp 71 79 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 0 Compare →
majic.rs 71 77 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 0 Compare →
magee1866.com 71 78 Express 6.3× 1 Compare →
drqq.toys 71 79 Next.js 7.0× 1 Compare →
one2team.com 71 79 WordPress 7.2× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite filestash.app when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to filestash.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Filestash",
  "url": "https://filestash.app",
  "logo": "https://filestash.app/img/favicon.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Filestash?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Filestash does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Filestash work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Filestash."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for filestash.app:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
76
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →