fing.com 73 B
🛡️ SEO 74 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 100

fing.com — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

fing.com
📊

fing.com achieves a 79/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the infrastructure sector, fing.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 3.4× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 26 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 12 ACRI +1 (66→67)
Does your site score higher than fing.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)74 × 0.25 = 18.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 18.5 + 33.6 + 5.4 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
46
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #19615
+8 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

fing.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why fing.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.4×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

74/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

60 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

177 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 25
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.fing.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Network Scanner & Monitoring Tool for Home and Office | Fing
  • ✓ og:description — Fing is a powerful network scanner and monitoring tool that helps you discover devices, enhance cybersecurity, and optimize performance. Trusted by home users and professionals.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
fing.com
67
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 46/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 134 elements (134 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2122
Raw Density6.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

69
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability69/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

29%
🗑️ 71%
Useful Content (51.9 KB)Bloat (126.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage44 / 44 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

40 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 70.9% · SNR: 0.41 · Signal: 13298 / Noise: 32411 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of fing.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Fing is a network scanner and monitoring tool designed to help users strengthen cybersecurity, manage their networks, and identify connected
Target Audience
Home users, IT professionals, MSPs, cybersecurity professionals, network administrators
Pricing Model
Freemium, with monthly plans ranging from $3.99 to $16.99, and annual plans ranging from $39.99 to $149.99.
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and a comprehensive feature set, combined with a strong user base and continuous development.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3944 ms
Raw HTML Size178.6 KB
Visible Text Size51.9 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3944 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1554
DOM nodes
179 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.fing.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

108
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for fing.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/fing.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=fing.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 118 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 118 pages · Range 0–85
Topical Cohesion
19%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
146627
Avg Bloat
29.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
114
⚠️
114 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 114 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.fing.com/fing-terms-of-service/
Terms of Service - Fing
pricing 85 6.2× 3216 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/fing-privacy-policy/
Privacy Policy - Fing
pricing 85 5.2× 4176 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/es/fing-terms-of-service/
Condiciones del servicio - Fing
pricing 85 6.2× 3216 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/es/fing-privacy-policy/
Política de privacidad - Fing
pricing 85 5.2× 4177 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/es/faq/
Fing FAQ | Respuestas a Preguntas Frecuentes
pricing 75 13.8× 1355 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/web-app-new-launch/
Introducing a New Web App - Fing
pricing 75 11.2× 2079 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/fing-desktop-guide/
Welcome to Fing Desktop: Your Network Management Starter Pack - Fing
pricing 75 12.6× 1924 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/es/cookies/
Política de cookies - Fing
pricing 75 11.0× 1664 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/fing-insights-gaming-devices/
Fing Insights #2: Exploring Gaming Devices Stats - Fing
pricing 75 11.2× 2092 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/fing-agent-raspberry-vs-nas-vs-docker/
Raspberry Pi vs NAS vs Docker: Which Is the Best Way to Deploy Fing Agent? - Fing
pricing 75 13.3× 1723 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/best-internet-providers-near-me/
Compare Internet Providers: How to Choose the Best ISP - Fing
pricing 75 12.2× 1887 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/cookies/
Cookies - Fing
pricing 75 11.0× 1662 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/glossary/what-is-dns/
What is DNS - Fing
pricing 75 10.2× 2098 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/fing-insights-3-jumping-into-home-automation/
Fing Insights #3: Jumping into Home Automation - Fing
pricing 75 13.4× 1700 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/fing-insights-4-the-world-of-smartwatches/
Fing Insights #4: The World of Smartwatches - Fing
pricing 75 11.9× 1938 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/best-free-network-ip-scanner/
8 Awesome Reasons Why Fing is the Best Free Network IP Scanner for Securing Your Wi-Fi - Fing
pricing 75 13.8× 1635 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/network-monitoring-features/
Network Monitoring with Fing: What It Is and How It Works - Fing
pricing 75 14.1× 1628 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/best-network-scanner-apps/
Best Network Scanner Apps in 2026 - Fing
pricing 75 13.6× 1704 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/what-can-i-do-if-my-wi-fi-is-not-working/
Why Isn’t My WiFi Working? 10 Quick Fixes for Slow or Broken Internet - Fing
pricing 75 12.2× 1915 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.fing.com/news/fing-it-consultant/
How Fing Agent Can Elevate Your IT Consultancy - Fing
pricing 75 11.1× 2109 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/news/ 79 71 0% 17.2× High JS Bloat
/es/ 14 62 0% 55.6× High JS Bloat
/glossary/ 6 62 0% 60.7× High JS Bloat
/developers/ 2 49 0% 111.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 2 67 0% 24.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 2 44 0% 96.3× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 2 72 0% 14.7× High JS Bloat
/fing-privacy-policy/ 1 85 0% 5.2× High JS Bloat
/cookies/ 1 75 0% 10.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 72 0% 17.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact-us/ 1 44 0% 124.6× High JS Bloat
/fing-terms-of-service/ 1 85 0% 6.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 118 pages
youtube.com ×114
play.google.com ×114
threads.net ×114
instagram.com ×114
wpml.org ×114
lansweeper.com ×114
hub.docker.com ×114
twitter.com ×114
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/fing.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to fing.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
fing.com (this site) 67 79 WordPress 3.4× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite fing.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to fing.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Fing?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Fing does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Fing work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Fing."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for fing.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →