force.com 40 D
🛡️ SEO 51 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 66

force.com — Global SEODiff Score 40/100

force.com
📊

The AI-Readiness score for force.com stands at a concerning 15/100, placing it among the least AI-accessible sites in the index. Compared to other government sites (avg score: 57), force.com is trailing the benchmark, indicating room for competitive improvement. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 8.8× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are restricted by robots.txt — the site has limited accessibility to AI search.

40
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (28) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 9 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than force.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)51 × 0.25 = 12.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)66 × 0.15 = 9.9
Weighted sum = 12.8 + 29.2 + 5.6 + 9.9
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 40 (D)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
20
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #617
+67 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 67%
Score 15/100

force.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why force.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrygovernment
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat8.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

51/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

67 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

142 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 95
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.salesforce.com/platform/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform)
  • ✓ og:description — Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) powers the Agentic Enterprise, combining metadata, governance, MuleSoft and Data Cloud.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, gep.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
force.com
52
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gep.com has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Drupal. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 416 elements (416 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3723
Raw Density11.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 4 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (58.7 KB)Bloat (457.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context16% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage29 / 178 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 16% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.6% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 15027 / Noise: 117014 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of force.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Connect humans, data, and AI agents on one platform for intelligent and fast operations.
Target Audience
CEOs, CIOs, developers, sales teams, service teams, marketing teams, commerce teams
Pricing Model
Not explicitly mentioned
🔗 Integration Partners
SalesforceSlack
🏆 Competitive Moat
Expansive, trusted platform for quick innovation.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
directory listingscomparison pagesAPI reference docs
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No specific pain points mentioned in the text
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1224 ms
Raw HTML Size515.8 KB
Visible Text Size58.7 KB

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1224 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4359
DOM nodes
516 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=86302
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

66/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

452
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for force.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/force.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=force.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 23 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
+3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 23 pages · Range 29–57
Total Words
6050
Avg Bloat
371.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://force.com/pricing
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/api
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/guides
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 384.4× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/about
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/help
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/resources
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.5× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/features
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/solutions
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/blog
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/docs
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/get-started
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.5× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/case-studies
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/demo
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.5× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/contact
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/integrations
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/faq
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/support
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.5× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/trust
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.5× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/security
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.5× 275 💰 Pricing
https://force.com/careers
Agentforce 360 Platform (Formerly Salesforce Platform) | Salesforce
pricing 57 383.8× 275 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 23 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 57 0% 383.5× High JS Bloat
/demo/ 1 57 0% 383.5× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 57 0% 383.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/help/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/terms/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/privacy/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 29 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 57 0% 383.8× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/force.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to force.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
force.com (this site) 52 15 WordPress 8.8× 1
globaljournals.org 76 88 WordPress 9.7× 1 Compare →
atu.ie 76 87 WordPress 6.4× 1 Compare →
itsligo.ie 76 87 WordPress 6.4× 1 Compare →
gmit.ie 76 87 WordPress 6.4× 1 Compare →
primegov.com 76 86 WordPress 5.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite force.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

57
Homepage ACRI
55
Inner Avg ACRI
+2
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
19%
Inner Avg Ghost
1
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
57 20% pricing https://force.com/contact
57 20% pricing https://force.com/about
57 20% pricing https://force.com/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

26 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

364
Total Links
26
Unique Domains
24.3
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
salesforceventures.com youtube.com cs.salesforce.com trailblazercommunitygroups.com architect.salesforce.com ideas.salesforce.com billing.salesforce.com salesforcestore.com trailblazers.salesforce.com netzero.salesforce.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 14.7

AI trust scores for the domains force.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to force.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Force",
  "url": "https://force.com",
  "logo": "https://force.com/c2/public/app/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Force",
  "url": "https://force.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://force.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Force?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Force does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Force work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Force."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for force.com:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
44
Improvement
+29 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →