foxsheets.com 76 B
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 61
Radar → Domains → foxsheets.com

foxsheets.com — Global SEODiff Score 76/100

foxsheets.com
📊

foxsheets.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 82/100, outperforming 96% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places foxsheets.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 3.8× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

76
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Architecture (61) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
72
🛡️ Traditional SEO
87
🤖 AI Readiness
68
⚡ Performance
61
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Apr 3, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than foxsheets.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)61 × 0.15 = 9.2
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 34.8 + 13.6 + 9.2
Global SEODiff Score = 76 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
58
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #171101
-13 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

foxsheets.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why foxsheets.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryinfrastructure
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other WordPress sites → infrastructure industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

163 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

364 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://ufabet168.city/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → th
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — UFA168 เว็บเดิมพันตัวจริง UFABET ครบทุกเกมเดิมพัน อันดับ 1 ในเอเชีย
  • ✓ og:description — UFA168 เว็บตรงยูฟ่าแท้ ไม่ผ่านเอเย่นต์ รวมเกมเดิมพันออนไลน์ครบวงจร ทางเข้ายูฟ่า168 ผ่านระบบออโต้ เล่นได้ตลอด 24 ชั่วโมง ฮิตที่สุดในปี 2026
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
foxsheets.com
72
Your ACRI Score
→
safely.co.jp
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 58/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 80 elements (68 lists, 9 rows, 3 headers)
Total Words789
Raw Density10.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

73
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability73/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

26%
🗑️ 74%
Useful Content (43.2 KB)Bloat (122.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

30 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.9% · SNR: 0.35 · Signal: 11048 / Noise: 31221 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of foxsheets.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
UFA168 and UFABET168 are the same website, offering a comprehensive online betting platform in Thailand, including sports betting, live casino,
Target Audience
Betting enthusiasts, sports fans, casino players, lottery participants in Thailand
Pricing Model
Variable - Based on betting amounts and game types, with potential for commission rebates on certain games.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive betting platform with a focus on the Thai market, commission rebates, and mobile responsiveness.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Google search queries: UFA168, UFABET168
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of explicit pricing information
• Limited SEO signals beyond brand names
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-09

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time561 ms
Raw HTML Size165.1 KB
Visible Text Size43.2 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

561 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

645
DOM nodes
165 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

61/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
62
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → th
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 72/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for foxsheets.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/foxsheets.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=foxsheets.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
72
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
70
Avg across 10 pages · Range 70–70
Total Words
7920
Avg Bloat
58.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://foxsheets.com/pricing
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 pricing 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/about
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 about 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/features
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 product 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/products
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 product 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/blog
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 blog 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/docs
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 docs 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/case-studies
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 social-proof 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/faq
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 support 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/integrations
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 integrations 70 58.9× 792 ✓
https://foxsheets.com/contact
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
 support 70 58.9× 792 ✓
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/contact/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 70 0% 58.9× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
aff.ufabet168.partners ×10
ufa365.ltd ×10
member.ufabet168.partners ×10
lin.ee ×10
bit.ly ×10
google.com ×10
ufabct168.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/foxsheets.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to foxsheets.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
foxsheets.com (this site) 72 82 WordPress 3.8× 2 —
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite foxsheets.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.