futabanenga.jp 66 C
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 69

futabanenga.jp — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

futabanenga.jp
📊

With an ACRI of 86/100, futabanenga.jp stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. In the infrastructure sector, futabanenga.jp outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 3.1× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 13, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 13
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than futabanenga.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)69 × 0.15 = 10.3
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 31.6 + 10.6 + 10.3
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #773193
-76 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 86/100

futabanenga.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why futabanenga.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

77 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

363 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://futabanenga.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 年賀状印刷2026午年|年賀状はフタバ|送料無料でお届け!
  • ✓ og:description — 宛名印刷無料・全国送料無料・最短翌日発送でお届け。さらに割引特典でお得に印刷。高品質で豊富なデザインの年賀状をスマホから5分でカンタンにご注文いただけます。2026年(令和8年)午年の年賀状をカンタンかつお得に印刷したい方はフタバにおまかせください!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
futabanenga.jp
71
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 141 elements (141 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words266
Raw Density53.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

85
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability85/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

32%
🗑️ 68%
Useful Content (30.0 KB)Bloat (64.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context96% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage78 / 81 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

48 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 68.1% · SNR: 0.47 · Signal: 7679 / Noise: 16388 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of futabanenga.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website offers a platform for designing and ordering personalized New Year’s cards, including traditional Japanese designs, character illustrations, and
Target Audience
Individuals, families, businesses, and organizations seeking to create and order New Year’s cards, including those looking for character designs and photo integration.
Pricing Model
Tiered pricing based on quantity and design options, ranging from ¥4,350 for the ‘Simple’ tier to ¥7,250 for ‘Premium Gold Foil’ for 30 cards.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive design selection (500+), character illustrations, photo integration, and a focus on both individual and business needs provide a strong competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Category pages (Design Categories)Template comparison pages (Photo Year Cards)Search functionality (Design No., Character, etc.)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO schema for FAQ
• Lack of detailed product descriptions beyond quantity and price
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-04-04

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache/2.4.57
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1562 ms
Raw HTML Size94.0 KB
Visible Text Size30.0 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1562 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

897
DOM nodes
94 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

69/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

142
internal links
19
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for futabanenga.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/futabanenga.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=futabanenga.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 9 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
-62
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
10
Avg across 9 pages · Range 0–49
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 71, but internal pages average only 10 — a -62-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
429
Avg Bloat
11.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://futabanenga.jp/products
【2026年 午年】年賀状印刷はフタバ
product 49 48.4× 261
https://futabanenga.jp/contact
お問い合わせ|年賀状印刷2026午年|年賀状はフタバ
support 39 54.2× 168
https://futabanenga.jp/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://futabanenga.jp/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://futabanenga.jp/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://futabanenga.jp/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://futabanenga.jp/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://futabanenga.jp/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://futabanenga.jp/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 39 0% 54.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 49 0% 48.5× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 9 pages
instagram.com ×2
rakuten.ne.jp ×2
mageplus.jp ×2
twitter.com ×2
nengacollection.jp ×2
facebook.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/futabanenga.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to futabanenga.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
futabanenga.jp (this site) 71 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 1
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
safescan.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 5 Compare →
kobekyo.com 90 94 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite futabanenga.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to futabanenga.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Futabanenga?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Futabanenga does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Futabanenga work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Futabanenga."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for futabanenga.jp:

Current Score
86
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →