gclick.com.br 70 B
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 75 🏗️ Arch 72

gclick.com.br — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

gclick.com.br
📊

With a solid 70/100 ACRI, gclick.com.br is well-positioned for AI search — better than 67% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), gclick.com.br performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.8×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than gclick.com.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)75 × 0.20 = 15.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)72 × 0.15 = 10.8
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 31.6 + 15.0 + 10.8
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
46
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 19%
Rank #188631
+15 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

gclick.com.br shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gclick.com.br ranks here

Tech stackHubSpot CMS
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat3.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

19 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

147 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.omie.com.br/gclick/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Omie.G-Click
  • ✓ og:description — Descubra o Omie.GClick: automação essencial para uma gestão eficiente integrada ao seu ERP. Simplifique e otimize as operações da sua empresa!
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gclick.com.br
55
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 46/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 127 elements (127 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1980
Raw Density6.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

26%
🗑️ 74%
Useful Content (15.4 KB)Bloat (43.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context91% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage62 / 68 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

30 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.8% · SNR: 0.36 · Signal: 3936 / Noise: 11082 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of gclick.com.br and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Omie.G-Click is a SaaS platform designed to streamline accounting workflows for Brazilian accounting firms, automating tasks like invoice processing, tax
Target Audience
Accounting firm owners, partners, managers, and accountants seeking to improve efficiency, reduce manual effort, and enhance client service.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based pricing with tiered options: R$ 100/user/month for a single user, R$ 50/month per user for a team, and a custom quote for specialized training.
🔗 Integration Partners
WhatsAppPDFEnqueteFluxo cascataWhatsapp
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered automation and a focus on Brazilian accounting regulations provide a significant advantage over generic task management tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-09

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHubSpot CMS
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time480 ms
Raw HTML Size58.7 KB
Visible Text Size15.4 KB

Performance & Speed

75/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

480 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

840
DOM nodes
59 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comjs.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

72/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

5
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gclick.com.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gclick.com.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gclick.com.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
+22
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
77
Avg across 10 pages · Range 77–77
Total Words
18650
Avg Bloat
6.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gclick.com.br/pricing
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/about
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/products
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/features
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/blog
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/docs
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/case-studies
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/contact
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/integrations
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
https://gclick.com.br/faq
Omie.G-Click | Omie
pricing 77 6.4× 1865 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/features/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 77 0% 6.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
ajuda.gclick.com.br ×10
facebook.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
wa.me ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gclick.com.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gclick.com.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gclick.com.br (this site) 55 70 HubSpot CMS 3.8× 0
bashfashion.co.uk 80 82 Next.js 4.0× 1 Compare →
home.edweb.net 80 88 WordPress 4.1× 1 Compare →
officeshoes.hu 80 89 Cloudflare Pages 2.0× 1 Compare →
sneci.hu 80 87 Express 1.9× 1 Compare →
versekcorp.com 80 89 Shopify 4.1× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gclick.com.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gclick.com.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Com",
  "url": "https://gclick.com.br",
  "logo": "https://gclick.com.br/images/ico-O.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Com",
  "url": "https://gclick.com.br",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://gclick.com.br/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gclick.com.br:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →