geoguesser.io 81 A
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 76

geoguesser.io — Global SEODiff Score 81/100

geoguesser.io
📊

At 78/100, the ACRI for geoguesser.io indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A tight 3.0× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. With 4 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

81
A — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Excellent overall visibility. Traditional SEO (84) is your strongest pillar.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than geoguesser.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 32.8 + 16.0 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 81 (A)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 35
88
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #739264
-61 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

geoguesser.io ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 12%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why geoguesser.io ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat3.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

152 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — GeoGuesser - Free GeoGuessr & Unlimited Games
  • ✓ og:description — Explore the world and test your geography skills with GeoGuesser. Guess locations, earn points, and compete with friends in a fun street-view challenge!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 11 elements (11 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words585
Raw Density1.9%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 11 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

74
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability74/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

33%
🗑️ 67%
Useful Content (10.2 KB)Bloat (20.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage13 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

50 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 66.2% · SNR: 0.51 · Signal: 2607 / Noise: 5115 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of geoguesser.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
GeoGuesser is a geography game where players identify locations using Google Street View.
Target Audience
Casual gamers, geography enthusiasts, puzzle solvers
Pricing Model
Freemium – limited gameplay in free version, premium subscription for unlimited access.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Utilizes Google Street View for immersive location identification.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-04-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx/1.28.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time626 ms
Raw HTML Size30.2 KB
Visible Text Size10.2 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

626 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

213
DOM nodes
30 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgooglesyndication.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://geoguesser.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

4
internal links
0
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for geoguesser.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/geoguesser.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=geoguesser.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
-55
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
7
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 61, but internal pages average only 7 — a -55-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
204
Avg Bloat
0.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://geoguesser.io/about
About | GeoSuesser
about 67 6.2× 204
https://geoguesser.io/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://geoguesser.io/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 67 0% 6.2× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/geoguesser.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to geoguesser.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
geoguesser.io (this site) 61 78 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 4
viralxxxporn.com 71 77 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
ready-market.com.tw 71 85 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 3 Compare →
taiwan.vivinavi.com 71 81 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 2 Compare →
cabletiesandmore.com 71 81 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 1 Compare →
g.pl 71 73 Custom / Proprietary 5.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite geoguesser.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →