getproton.me 71 B
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 74 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 67

getproton.me — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

getproton.me
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for getproton.me is strong: an ACRI of 81/100 places it ahead of 95% of domains in the index. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), getproton.me performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (10%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The bloated 16.4× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than getproton.me?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)74 × 0.40 = 29.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)67 × 0.15 = 10.0
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 29.6 + 10.4 + 10.0
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
47
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 18%
Rank #176834
-12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

getproton.me is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why getproton.me ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat16.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

35 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

138 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://protonvpn.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The best VPN for speed and security
  • ✓ og:description — Get fast, secure VPN service in 120+ countries. Download our free VPN now — or check out Proton VPN Plus for even more premium features.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

74/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
getproton.me
61
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 47/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 166 elements (145 lists, 9 rows, 12 headers)
Total Words2498
Raw Density6.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (20.1 KB)Bloat (309.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio16.4× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context43% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage28 / 65 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 43% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.9% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 5134 / Noise: 79285 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of getproton.me and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Proton VPN provides secure and fast internet access by encrypting your traffic and hiding your IP address, enabling unrestricted access
Target Audience
Tech-savvy individuals, privacy advocates, travelers, users seeking access to geo-restricted content, and families looking for secure online communication.
Pricing Model
Freemium with paid tiers (VPN Plus, Unlimited, Visionary, Family) ranging from $0/month for the free plan to $0.00/month for the first 24 months for VPN Plus, then $0.00/month for the next 12 months.
🔗 Integration Partners
ChromeFirefoxAndroidiPhone/iPadLinuxApple TVAndroid TVFire TV
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2GDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
Combination of AI-powered sprint planning, a strict no-logs policy, fully open-source apps, and a strong focus on privacy and security, coupled with a community-supported model.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-09

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time651 ms
Raw HTML Size329.8 KB
Visible Text Size20.1 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

651 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2222
DOM nodes
330 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=120, s-maxage=120, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

67/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

118
internal links
68
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for getproton.me
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/getproton.me" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=getproton.me" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
+3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 10 pages · Range 64–64
Total Words
15488
Avg Bloat
44.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
10
⚠️
10 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 10 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://getproton.me/pricing
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/about
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/features
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/products
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/docs
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/blog
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/case-studies
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/contact
The best VPN for speed and security
pricing 64 47.7× 1552 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/faq
The best VPN for speed and security | Proton VPN
pricing 64 43.1× 1548 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://getproton.me/integrations
The best VPN for speed and security
pricing 64 47.7× 1552 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 47.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 64 0% 47.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 64 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
cnet.com ×10
threads.net ×10
discord.gg ×10
cyberghostvpn.com ×10
t.me ×10
youtube.com ×10
zdnet.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/getproton.me

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to getproton.me. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
getproton.me (this site) 61 81 Express 16.4× 1
edicionesgesicap.com 85 86 Express 4.2× 4 Compare →
photopoint.ee 86 87 Express 1.1× 2 Compare →
indypl.org 85 87 Express 2.5× 5 Compare →
sos-ricambi.it 86 94 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite getproton.me when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to getproton.me. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for getproton.me:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →