gizmodo.com.au 73 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 76

gizmodo.com.au — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

gizmodo.com.au
📊

gizmodo.com.au shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 78/100, outperforming 88% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places gizmodo.com.au above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 5.7× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -1 (63→62)
Does your site score higher than gizmodo.com.au?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 32.8 + 10.4 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
40
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #31067
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

gizmodo.com.au shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gizmodo.com.au ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

28 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

133 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 18
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://gizmodo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
  • ✓ og:description — Dive into cutting-edge tech, reviews and the latest trends with the expert team at Gizmodo. Your ultimate source for all things tech.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gizmodo.com.au
62
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 40/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 115 elements (115 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2432
Raw Density4.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

17%
🗑️ 83%
Useful Content (68.7 KB)Bloat (323.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage95 / 100 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 82.5% · SNR: 0.21 · Signal: 17582 / Noise: 82748 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of gizmodo.com.au and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps engineering teams and product managers plan sprints effectively, optimize resource allocation, and reduce wasted time by
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, software developers, and agile teams.
Pricing Model
Not explicitly stated, but implied to be tiered with a potential freemium model based on the article’s mention of ‘launch offers’ and ‘limited-time pricing’.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning and real-time resource optimization, providing a competitive advantage through intelligent automation.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time526 ms
Raw HTML Size391.9 KB
Visible Text Size68.7 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

526 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2217
DOM nodes
392 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

13
internal links
276
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gizmodo.com.au
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gizmodo.com.au" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gizmodo.com.au" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
61
Avg across 21 pages · Range 61–61
Topical Cohesion
5%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
47790
Avg Bloat
35.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
21
⚠️
21 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 21 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gizmodo.com.au/pricing
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/api
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/guides
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/about
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/resources
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/help
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/solutions
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/features
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/products
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/blog
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/docs
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/case-studies
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/get-started
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/demo
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/faq
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/contact
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/integrations
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.1× 2282 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/support
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/trust
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://gizmodo.com.au/security
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
pricing 61 35.3× 2270 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/trust/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
/api/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
/support/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
/help/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/demo/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
/careers/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 61 1% 35.1× Bot Blocked
/security/ 1 61 1% 35.3× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
fr.gizmodo.com ×21
instagram.com ×21
youtube.com ×21
x.com ×21
facebook.com ×21
linkedin.com ×21
de.gizmodo.com ×21
gizmodo.com ×21
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gizmodo.com.au

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gizmodo.com.au. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gizmodo.com.au (this site) 62 78 WordPress 5.7× 1
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gizmodo.com.au when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gizmodo.com.au. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gizmodo.com.au:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →