gosee.news 50 D
🛡️ SEO 31 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 11 🏗️ Arch 56

gosee.news — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

gosee.news
📊

At 74/100, the ACRI for gosee.news indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places gosee.news above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 2.0× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (11) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than gosee.news?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)31 × 0.25 = 7.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)11 × 0.20 = 2.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)56 × 0.15 = 8.4
Weighted sum = 7.8 + 31.2 + 2.2 + 8.4
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
69
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #563547
-34 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

gosee.news ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 22%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gosee.news ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

31/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

63 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

166 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 30
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 85
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.gosee.news/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gosee.news
64
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 69/100 — Good
Structured Elements 1302 elements (1221 lists, 42 rows, 39 headers)
Total Words9128
Raw Density14.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

50%
🗑️ 50%
Useful Content (450.4 KB)Bloat (456.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context19% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 120 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 19% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

75 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 50.3% · SNR: 0.99 · Signal: 115307 / Noise: 116754 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of gosee.news and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
GoSee is a curated platform showcasing talent and inspiration for creative campaigns, providing a source of celebrity, fashion, and advertising news.
Target Audience
Creative directors, art directors, marketing professionals, advertising agencies, and media buyers.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based access to content and talent listings, with potential tiers based on usage and features.
🔗 Integration Partners
Slack
🏆 Competitive Moat
Curated content and talent discovery, providing a focused and efficient way to find creative resources.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template-generated article pagesCategory pages (e.g., Creatives to Watch)Tag pages (e.g., Fashion, Advertising)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO optimization of individual articles
• Lack of structured data for talent profiles
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-26

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time8954 ms
Raw HTML Size906.5 KB
Visible Text Size450.4 KB

Performance & Speed

11/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

8954 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

7218
DOM nodes
906 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

56/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

449
internal links
36
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gosee.news
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gosee.news" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gosee.news" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 10 pages · Range 54–67
Topical Cohesion
1%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
58282
Avg Bloat
30.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gosee.news/pricing
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/about
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/products
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/docs
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/blog
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6438 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/case-studies
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/contact
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6437 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/faq
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/integrations
GoSee: Ultimate Source of Celebrity, Fashion & Advertising News
pricing 67 29.3× 6439 💰 Pricing
https://gosee.news/features
FEATURES - Member - GoSee
pricing 54 38.8× 334 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/contact/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 54 0% 38.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 67 0% 29.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
gosee.expert ×10
gosee.us ×1
gosee.de ×1
facebook.com ×1
linkedin.com ×1
web.whatsapp.com ×1
twitter.com ×1
pinterest.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gosee.news

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gosee.news. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gosee.news (this site) 64 74 Express 2.0× 0
photopoint.ee 86 87 Express 1.1× 2 Compare →
sos-ricambi.it 86 94 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-zubehoer.de 88 95 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
jagoanchetslot.com 87 92 Express 6.5× 8 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gosee.news when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gosee.news. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "News",
  "url": "https://gosee.news",
  "logo": "https://gosee.news/images/default/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "News",
  "url": "https://gosee.news",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://gosee.news/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is News?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what News does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does News work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with News."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gosee.news:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →