gostinder.ru 49 D
🛡️ SEO 44 🤖 GEO 57 ⚡ Perf 16 🏗️ Arch 80

gostinder.ru — Global SEODiff Score 49/100

gostinder.ru
📊

At 67/100, the ACRI for gostinder.ru indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the developer vertical, this places gostinder.ru above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 37.4× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

49
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (16) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (37×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than gostinder.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)44 × 0.25 = 11.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)57 × 0.40 = 22.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)16 × 0.20 = 3.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 11.0 + 22.8 + 3.2 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 49 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
19
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 49%
Rank #490702
-8 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 67/100

gostinder.ru is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gostinder.ru ranks here

Tech stackNuxt.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat37.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

44/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

103 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

285 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — TenChat – соцсеть для поиска клиентов, работы и нетворкинга
  • ✓ og:description — TenChat — деловая соцсеть для поиска клиентов, работы и деловых контактов. Профиль как визитка, CV и портфолио. AI-поиск, бизнес-сервисы и нетворкинг без барьеров
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

57/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gostinder.ru
42
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 19/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 32 elements (32 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2891
Raw Density1.1%
💡Low structure score (19/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 32 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

34
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability34/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (38.5 KB)Bloat (1399.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio37.4× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context99% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage156 / 157 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1438.3 KB, but only 38.5 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (37.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.3% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 9853 / Noise: 358357 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of gostinder.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
TenChat provides a convenient way to exchange contacts, leveraging AI-powered insights to help users understand content platform algorithms and build a strong online presence.
Target Audience
Digital marketers, content creators, influencers, bloggers, and entrepreneurs seeking to improve their online visibility and engagement.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based with tiered plans, starting from a premium+ option offering advanced features and a dedicated account manager.
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered insights into content platform algorithms and user behavior, combined with a focus on community building and targeted audience engagement.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesBlog posts about content platform algorithmsLanding pages for specific features
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Difficulty understanding content platform algorithms
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-23

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNuxt.js
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2651 ms
Raw HTML Size1438.3 KB
Visible Text Size38.5 KB

Performance & Speed

16/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2651 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4131
DOM nodes
1438 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

126
internal links
38
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 42/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gostinder.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gostinder.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gostinder.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
42
Single-page score
-32
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
11
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–70
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 42, but internal pages average only 11 — a -32-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
5914
Avg Bloat
17.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gostinder.ru/blog
Юзер Юзер, отзывы — TenChat
blog 70 23.3× 5721
https://gostinder.ru/docs
Юридические документы
docs 36 151.1× 193
https://gostinder.ru/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://gostinder.ru/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 70 0% 23.3× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 36 0% 151.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
business.tenchat.ru ×2
cdn1.tenchat.ru ×2
tenchat.ru ×2
vbankcenter.ru ×2
sk.ru ×2
tencard.ru ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gostinder.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gostinder.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gostinder.ru (this site) 42 67 Nuxt.js 37.4× 1
sportfish.co.uk 67 77 Express 25.1× 2 Compare →
movingtoathens.com 67 85 Express 27.2× 4 Compare →
docs.getdx.com 67 83 Cloudflare Pages 3.8× 1 Compare →
magehost.pro 67 85 WordPress 12.2× 1 Compare →
newsmaker.md 67 83 WordPress 13.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gostinder.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gostinder.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Gostinder",
  "url": "https://gostinder.ru",
  "logo": "https://gostinder.ru/static-img/favicons/red/favicon-16x16.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Gostinder",
  "url": "https://gostinder.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://gostinder.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gostinder.ru:

Current Score
67
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →