hatena.com 50 D
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 40

hatena.com — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

hatena.com
📊

With a solid 77/100 ACRI, hatena.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 86% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, hatena.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 21.2× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (40) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (21×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 14 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than hatena.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)40 × 0.15 = 6.0
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 24.8 + 9.4 + 6.0
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
78
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 13%
Rank #130724
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

hatena.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why hatena.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat21.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

9 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

168 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — はてな
  • ✓ og:description — ブログもニュースもコミュニティも。知りたいこと、伝えたいことが集まる、はてなのコンテンツプラットフォーム。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
hatena.com
51
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 78/100 — Good
Structured Elements 94 elements (94 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words512
Raw Density18.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

53
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability53/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (75/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (14.2 KB)Bloat (287.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio21.2× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 83 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 301.6 KB, but only 14.2 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (21.2×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.3% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 3647 / Noise: 73561 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of hatena.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Hatena is a Japanese social media and blogging platform offering a range of services including blogging, bookmarking, anonymous diaries, and
Target Audience
Bloggers, social media users, Japanese internet users seeking community and self-expression, users interested in anonymous online experiences.
Pricing Model
Freemium - Core services are free, with optional premium features and storage available through paid subscriptions.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Strong user base within Japan, established community, and a focus on privacy and anonymity – a key differentiator in a market dominated by larger global platforms.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of browser support for newer browsers
• Thin landing pages for features
• Limited SEO visibility
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-07

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1055 ms
Raw HTML Size301.6 KB
Visible Text Size14.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1055 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1127
DOM nodes
302 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

40/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1
internal links
403
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 51/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for hatena.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/hatena.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=hatena.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
51
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 10 pages · Range 50–50
Topical Cohesion
1%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
5140
Avg Bloat
124.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://hatena.com/pricing
はてな
pricing 50 124.4× 514
https://hatena.com/about
はてな
about 50 124.4× 514
https://hatena.com/products
はてな
product 50 124.4× 514
https://hatena.com/features
はてな
product 50 124.4× 514
https://hatena.com/blog
はてな
blog 50 124.4× 514
https://hatena.com/docs
はてな
docs 50 123.9× 514
https://hatena.com/case-studies
はてな
social-proof 50 123.9× 514
https://hatena.com/contact
はてな
support 50 123.9× 514
https://hatena.com/faq
はてな
support 50 123.9× 514
https://hatena.com/integrations
はてな
integrations 50 123.9× 514
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 50 1% 124.4× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 50 1% 124.4× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 50 1% 124.4× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 50 1% 123.9× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 50 1% 123.9× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 50 1% 124.4× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 50 1% 124.4× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 50 1% 123.9× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 50 1% 123.9× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 50 1% 123.9× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
smhn.info ×10
zenn.dev ×10
toshikane.hatenablog.com ×10
j-cast.com ×10
sankei.com ×10
syu-m-5151.hatenablog.com ×10
news.web.nhk ×10
tetogame.hatenablog.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/hatena.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to hatena.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
hatena.com (this site) 51 77 Next.js 21.2× 0
armtec.ch 76 87 Next.js 8.0× 3 Compare →
chesshouse.com 76 84 Next.js 10.6× 7 Compare →
waldos.com.mx 76 95 Shopify 13.8× 3 Compare →
autocontrol.es 76 89 WordPress 10.2× 1 Compare →
muziker.bg 76 88 Ruby on Rails 9.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite hatena.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to hatena.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Hatena",
  "url": "https://hatena.com",
  "logo": "https://hatena.com/p/images/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Hatena",
  "url": "https://hatena.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://hatena.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Hatena?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Hatena does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Hatena work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Hatena."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for hatena.com:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →