hinge.co 63 C
🛡️ SEO 43 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 77

hinge.co — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

hinge.co
📊

At 75/100, the ACRI for hinge.co indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), hinge.co performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Heavy markup overhead (15.5× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (43) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 24 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than hinge.co?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)43 × 0.25 = 10.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)77 × 0.15 = 11.5
Weighted sum = 10.8 + 26.0 + 14.8 + 11.5
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
37
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #60789
+13 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

hinge.co shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why hinge.co ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat15.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

43/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

234 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://hinge.co
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Download Hinge, the dating app designed to be deleted
  • ✓ og:description — Hinge is built on the belief that anyone looking for love should be able to find it. It’s also built on an acclaimed Nobel-Prize-winning algorithm, so we can succeed in getting you out on promising dates, not keeping you on the app.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
hinge.co
44
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 37/100 — Low
Structured Elements 17 elements (17 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words419
Raw Density4.1%
💡Low structure score (37/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 17 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

53
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability53/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (5.9 KB)Bloat (85.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio15.5× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context44% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 9 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 44% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.6% · SNR: 0.07 · Signal: 1504 / Noise: 21854 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of hinge.co and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This document outlines the types of personal information the company collects and how it uses that information, focusing on compliance with California privacy laws.
Target Audience
Legal professionals, privacy officers, compliance teams, and individuals concerned with data privacy regulations (CCPA, CPRA).
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
social media networksconsumer reporting agenciespayment processorsfraud vendors
🛡️ Compliance Standards
CCPACPRA
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive data privacy compliance and a focus on California consumer rights.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
CCPACPRA
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complex data privacy regulations
• Need for detailed data processing documentation
• Risk of non-compliance with CCPA/CPRA
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerVercel
CDNvercel
HTTP Status200
Load Time535 ms
Raw HTML Size91.2 KB
Visible Text Size5.9 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

535 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

357
DOM nodes
91 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → vercel

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

77/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

45
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for hinge.co
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/hinge.co" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=hinge.co" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 66 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
+6
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 66 pages · Range 0–79
Topical Cohesion
15%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
40202
Avg Bloat
80.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://hinge.co/ccpa
For California Consumers | Hinge
other 79 9.4× 2399
https://hinge.co/newsroom/cuffing-season-guide-2025
What Daters Need to Know About Cuffing Season 2025 | Hinge
blog 66 18.5× 1058
https://hinge.co/newsroom/sxsw
Hinge Founder & CEO Justin McLeod Takes SXSW Mainstage to Talk About Culturally Confronting Loneliness | Hinge
other 66 19.7× 959
https://hinge.co/newsroom/love-and-adhd-report
Love and ADHD: Hinge’s New Report Empowers Daters to Rethink Communication Norms | Hinge
other 66 19.4× 1154
https://hinge.co/newsroom/social-energy-study-holidays
How to Create Low-Stakes Holiday Traditions with your Chosen Family | Hinge
other 66 19.9× 974
https://hinge.co/newsroom/valentines-day-guide
Your Guide to Valentine’s Day, Especially When Things Are Still New | Hinge
blog 66 19.0× 1005
https://hinge.co/newsroom/finances-and-dating
Hinge Expert’s Tips on Navigating Financial Transparency in Dating | Hinge
other 66 14.8× 1490
https://hinge.co/newsroom/how-hinge-works-with-real-couples
Behind Hinge’s Work with Real Couples to Celebrate Their Love Stories | Hinge
other 64 27.6× 909
https://hinge.co/accessibility-statement
Accessibility Statement | Hinge
other 64 27.2× 556
https://hinge.co/how-we-connect-daters
How We Connect Daters | Hinge
other 64 25.5× 1037
https://hinge.co/ai-principles
AI Principles | Hinge
other 64 22.2× 689
https://hinge.co/newsroom/dating-sunday-2026
What Daters Need to Know Ahead of Dating Sunday 2026 | Hinge
other 64 20.9× 1002
https://hinge.co/newsroom/newcomer-nerves
Overcoming “Newcomer Nerves”: Hinge’s Tips on Joining a Social Club | Hinge
other 64 21.6× 1039
https://hinge.co/newsroom/hinge-releases-third-dtbd-ad-campaign
Hinge’s Furry Mascot Will Die for Gen Z Love | Hinge
other 64 28.4× 605
https://hinge.co/careers
Work for Hinge and help more people find their person | Hinge
pricing 61 30.5× 1307 💰 Pricing
https://hinge.co/newsroom/2025-GenZ-Report
Hinge’s New D.A.T.E. Report: How Gen Z Daters Can Close The Communication Gap in 2026 | Hinge
other 61 25.1× 914
https://hinge.co/newsroom/hidden-words
Hinge Introduces Hidden Words to Give Daters Curated Control of Comments (Updated) | Hinge
other 61 28.9× 613
https://hinge.co/newsroom/prompt-feedback
Hinge Launches Prompt Feedback to Help Daters Create Unique and Authentic Profiles | Hinge
meta 61 26.8× 663
https://hinge.co/newsroom/2024-GenZ-Report
Hinge’s First Gen Z Report Reveals Top Dating Trends and Tips to Find a Relationship in 2024 | Hinge
other 61 20.0× 963
https://hinge.co/labs
Meet the love scientists at Hinge | Hinge
other 61 38.2× 763
Showing 20 of 66 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/newsroom/ 37 60 1% 82.4× Bot Blocked
/pandemicdating/ 1 41 1% 165.6× Bot Blocked
/trustandsafety/ 1 61 1% 28.5× Bot Blocked
/press-resources/ 1 31 1% 432.6× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/ccpa/ 1 79 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/how-we-connect-daters/ 1 64 0% 25.5× High JS Bloat
/production-credits-aug-25/ 1 51 1% 48.3× Bot Blocked
/onemorehour-phonebook/ 1 41 1% 203.1× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 51 1% 30.6× Bot Blocked
/mission/ 1 61 1% 46.9× Bot Blocked
/consumer-health-data-privacy-policy/ 1 51 1% 37.1× Bot Blocked
/labs/ 1 61 1% 38.2× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 66 pages
instagram.com ×58
hingeapp.zendesk.com ×58
twitter.com ×58
hinge1.typeform.com ×58
help.hinge.co ×8
files.hinge.co ×5
dropbox.com ×5
social-connection.org ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/hinge.co

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to hinge.co. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
hinge.co (this site) 44 75 Next.js 15.5× 1
burgschneider.com 69 85 Next.js 10.4× 1 Compare →
plushshop.com 69 82 Next.js 8.1× 2 Compare →
trueroll.com.tw 69 82 Next.js 2.6× 0 Compare →
libya.liveuamap.com 69 79 Custom / Proprietary 11.9× 0 Compare →
luladress.com 69 87 Shopify 10.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite hinge.co when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to hinge.co. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Hinge",
  "url": "https://hinge.co",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://hinge.co/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Hinge?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Hinge does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Hinge work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Hinge."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for hinge.co:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →